World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
6699
World Ranking
7693
National Ranking
188

Arnold K. Bregt publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arnold K. Bregt sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 155 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Arnold K. Bregt D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arnold K. Bregt sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Global mapping of soil salinity change

    Konstantin Ivushkin;Harm Bartholomeus;Arnold K. Bregt;Alim Pulatov

  • Revisiting Kappa to account for change in the accuracy assessment of land-use change models

    J. van Vliet;A.K. Bregt;A. Hagen-Zanker

  • An agent-based approach to model land-use change at a regional scale

    Diego Valbuena;Peter H. Verburg;Arnold K. Bregt;Arend Ligtenberg

  • Assessing the worldwide developments of national spatial data clearinghouses

    Joep Crompvoets;Arnold K. Bregt;Abbas Rajabifard;Ian P. Williamson

  • A method to define a typology for agent-based analysis in regional land-use research

    Diego Valbuena;Peter H. Verburg;Arnold K. Bregt

  • Exploring visitor movement patterns in natural recreational areas.

    Daniel Orellana;Arnold K. Bregt;Arend Ligtenberg;Monica Wachowicz

  • A review of current calibration and validation practices in land-change modeling

    Jasper van Vliet;Arnold K. Bregt;Daniel G. Brown;Hedwig van Delden

  • Do landslides follow landslides? Insights in path dependency from a multi-temporal landslide inventory

    Jalal Samia;Arnaud Temme;Arnold Bregt;Jakob Wallinga

  • Vegetation Structure and Temperature Regimes of Tropical Alpine Treelines

    Maaike Y. Bader;Max Rietkerk;Arnold K. Bregt

  • UAV based soil salinity assessment of cropland

    Konstantin Ivushkin;Harm Bartholomeus;Arnold K. Bregt;Alim Pulatov

  • Land use change and population growth in the Morobe Province of Papua New Guinea between 1975 and 2000.

    Tine Ningal;A.E. Hartemink;A.K. Bregt

  • The performance of spatial interpolation methods and choropleth maps to estimate properties at points: a soil survey case study.

    D.J. Brus;J.J. De Gruijter;B.A. Marsman;R. Visschers

  • Effects of farmers' decisions on the landscape structure of a Dutch rural region: An agent-based approach

    Diego Valbuena;Peter H. Verburg;Peter H. Verburg;A. Veldkamp;Arnold K. Bregt

  • Land Qualities in Space and Time

    J. Bouma;A.K. Bregt

  • Characterization and quantification of path dependency in landslide susceptibility

    Jalal Samia;Arnaud Temme;Arnaud Temme;Arnold Bregt;Jakob Wallinga

  • Core Principles and Concepts in Land-Use Modelling: A Literature Review

    Jonas van Schrojenstein Lantman;Peter H. Verburg;Arnold Bregt;Stan Geertman

  • Simulation of moisture deficits and areal interpolation by universal cokriging

    A. Stein;I. G. Staritsky;J. Bouma;A. C. Van Eijnsbergen

  • The dynamics of shifting cultivation captured in an extended Constrained Cellular Automata land use model

    Rohan Chandralal Wickramasuriya;Arnold K. Bregt;Hedwig van Delden;Alex Hagen-Zanker

  • Spatial data infrastructures as complex adaptive systems

    L. Grus;J. Crompvoets;A. K. Bregt

  • Measuring the neighbourhood effect to calibrate land use models

    Jasper van Vliet;Nick Naus;Ron J.A. van Lammeren;Arnold K. Bregt

  • World Status of National Spatial Data Clearinghouses

    J.W.H.C. Crompvoets;A.K. Bregt

  • Validation of an agent-based model for spatial planning: A role-playing approach

    Arend Ligtenberg;Ron J.A. van Lammeren;Arnold K. Bregt;Adrie J.M. Beulens

  • Cokriging Point Data on Moisture Deficit

    A. Stein;W. van Dooremolen;J. Bouma;A. K. Bregt

  • Citizen Sensing for Improved Urban Environmental Monitoring

    Qijun Jiang;Frank Kresin;Arnold K. Bregt;Lammert Kooistra

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael E. Schaepman
Michael E. Schaepman University of Zurich
Jan G. P. W. Clevers
Jan G. P. W. Clevers Wageningen University & Research
Peter H. Verburg
Peter H. Verburg Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Alfred Stein
Alfred Stein University of Twente
Abbas Rajabifard
Abbas Rajabifard University of Melbourne
Bingfang Wu
Bingfang Wu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Harm Bartholomeus
Harm Bartholomeus Wageningen University & Research
Jurian Edelenbos
Jurian Edelenbos Erasmus University Rotterdam
Johan Bouma
Johan Bouma Wageningen University & Research
Lammert Kooistra
Lammert Kooistra Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities and deepen expertise. Programs like geology degrees online provide a strong foundation in earth processes, critical for understanding environmental challenges.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are increasingly valuable. Pursuing degrees from the best GIS schools equips graduates with tools for spatial data analysis, vital in conservation and planning roles.

For those looking to intersect environmental knowledge with public policy and administration, online MPA degrees offer a pathway to leadership positions, enabling graduates to influence environmental policies effectively.

Understanding societal impacts is another key component. Earning a bachelors degree in sociology online can complement environmental studies by addressing human behaviors that affect sustainability efforts.

By integrating these related fields, students can tailor their education to meet the multifaceted demands of environmental careers.

Best Scientists Citing Arnold K. Bregt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles