World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 50 4066 3903 219 215 420 9994

Abbas Rajabifard publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Abbas Rajabifard between 1999 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Abbas Rajabifard published across 28 years, from 1999 to 2026, averaging 20.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2012. 36 of the 582 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2012. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 22 publications 2006: 27 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 32 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 37 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 32 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 28 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 28 publications 2025: 35 publications 2026: 1 publication
1999 2026

582 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Abbas Rajabifard: publications per year, 1999 to 2026
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 1
2001 4
2002 10
2003 15
2004 18
2005 22
2006 27
2007 19
2008 22
2009 23
2010 32
2011 17
2012 37
2013 25
2014 14
2015 24
2016 30
2017 32
2018 25
2019 27
2020 21
2021 28
2022 21
2023 23
2024 28
2025 35
2026 1
Total 582
Download as CSV

Abbas Rajabifard publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Abbas Rajabifard sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 418–427 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 420 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64 420
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Abbas Rajabifard D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Abbas Rajabifard sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210 50
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Abbas Rajabifard is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia, focusing on research within engineering and environmental science. Their work extensively covers specialized subfields including building and construction, geochemistry and petrology, global and planetary change, geography, planning and development, and geology.

The scientist's research spans several key topics, notably:

  • 3D modeling in geospatial applications
  • Geological modeling and analysis
  • Geographic information systems studies
  • 3D surveying and cultural heritage
  • BIM and construction integration
  • Remote sensing and LiDAR applications
  • Land use and ecosystem services

Recent publications by Abbas Rajabifard include:

  • Enhancing Healthcare through Sensor-Enabled Digital Twins in Smart Environments: A Comprehensive Analysis, 2024, Sensors
  • The wisdom of crowds for improved disaster resilience: a near-real-time analysis of crowdsourced social media data on the 2021 flood in Germany, 2023, GeoJournal
  • Potential and limitations of digital twins to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals, 2022, Nature Sustainability
  • A collaborative approach for urban underground space development toward sustainable development goals: Critical dimensions and future directions, 2021, Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering
  • Systematic prioritisation of SDGs: Machine learning approach, 2020, World Development

They have collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Mohsen Kalantari
  • Behnam Atazadeh
  • Davood Shojaei
  • Soheil Sabri
  • Yiqun Chen

Their scholarly articles are often published in journals such as:

  • Land Use Policy
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
  • The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
  • Land

Abbas Rajabifard has contributed to academic books published by university presses including:

  • Covid-19 Pandemic Geospatial Information and Community Resilience, University of Melbourne, 2021
  • The Science behind the COVID Pandemic and Healthcare Technology Solutions, Springer International Publishing, 2022

Best Publications

  • Using SDI and web-based system to facilitate disaster management

    A. Mansourian;A. Rajabifard;M. J. Valadan Zoej;I. Williamson

  • Developing Spatial Data Infrastructures: From Concept to Reality

    Ian Williamson;Mary-Ellen Feeney;Abbas Rajabifard

  • Spatial Data Infrastructures: Concept, SDI Hierarchy and Future Directions.

    A. Rajabifard;I. P. Williamson

  • Urban drought challenge to 2030 sustainable development goals

    Xiang Zhang;Nengcheng Chen;Hao Sheng;Chris Ip

  • The role of sub‐national government and the private sector in future spatial data infrastructures

    Abbas Rajabifard;Andrew Binns;Ian Masser;Ian P. Williamson

  • Evaluation of land administration systems

    Daniel Steudler;Abbas Rajabifard;Ian P. Williamson

  • Transport sustainability index: Melbourne case study

    Marzieh Reisi;Lu Aye;Abbas Rajabifard;Tuan Ngo

  • A new 3D indoor/outdoor spatial model for indoor emergency response facilitation

    Hosna Tashakkori;Abbas Rajabifard;Mohsen Kalantari

  • Sustainable development and geospatial information: a strategic framework for integrating a global policy agenda into national geospatial capabilities

    Greg Scott;Abbas Rajabifard

  • A framework for a microscale flood damage assessment and visualization for a building using BIM–GIS integration

    Sam Amirebrahimi;Abbas Rajabifard;Priyan Mendis;Tuan Ngo

  • An initial formal model for spatial data infrastructures

    Jan Hjelmager;Harold Moellering;Antony Cooper;Tatiana Delgado

  • Spatial Data Infrastructures: Concept, Nature and SDI Hierarchy

    A Rajabifard;M Feeney;Ip Williamson

  • Visualization requirements for 3D cadastral systems

    Davood Shojaei;Mohsen Kalantari;Ian D. Bishop;Abbas Rajabifard

  • A BIM-GIS integration method in support of the assessment and 3D visualisation of flood damage to a building

    Sam Amirebrahimi;Abbas Rajabifard;Priyan Mendis;Tuan Ngo

  • The dynamic nature of spatial data infrastructures: a method of descriptive classification

    Tai On Chan;Mary-Ellen Feeney;Abbas Rajabifard;Ian P. Williamson

  • Systematic prioritisation of SDGs: Machine learning approach

    Atie Asadikia;Abbas Rajabifard;Mohsen Kalantari

  • Building Information Modelling for High-rise Land Administration

    Behnam Atazadeh;Mohsen Kalantari;Abbas Rajabifard;Serene Ho

  • Methods for assessing the credibility of volunteered geographic information in flood response: A case study in Brisbane, Australia

    Kuo-Chih Hung;Mohsen Kalantari;Abbas Rajabifard

  • Towards integration of 3D legal and physical objects in cadastral data models

    Ali Aien;Mohsen Kalantari;Abbas Rajabifard;Ian P. Williamson

  • A Mixed User-Equilibrium and System-Optimal Traffic Flow for Connected Vehicles Stated as a Complementarity Problem

    Saeed Asadi Bagloee;Majid Sarvi;Michael Patriksson;Abbas Rajabifard

  • Extending a BIM-based data model to support 3D digital management of complex ownership spaces

    Behnam Atazadeh;Mohsen Kalantari;Abbas Rajabifard;Serene Ho

  • A geometric and semantic evaluation of 3D data sourcing methods for land and property information

    Ida Jazayeri;Abbas Rajabifard;Mohsen Kalantari

  • Spatially referenced legal property objects

    M. Kalantari;A. Rajabifard;J. Wallace;I. Williamson

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian D. Bishop
Ian D. Bishop University of Melbourne
Majid Sarvi
Majid Sarvi University of Melbourne
Russell G. Thompson
Russell G. Thompson University of Melbourne
Richard Tay
Richard Tay RMIT University
Tuan Ngo
Tuan Ngo University of Melbourne
Priyan Mendis
Priyan Mendis University of Melbourne
Arnold K. Bregt
Arnold K. Bregt Wageningen University & Research
Qunxiong Zhu
Qunxiong Zhu Beijing University of Chemical Technology
Nengcheng Chen
Nengcheng Chen Wuhan University
Emad Gad
Emad Gad Swinburne University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your study in Engineering and Technology opens the door to many flexible and affordable online degree options in the U.S. For those considering roles that blend technical expertise with business management, an online MBA no GMAT requirement can simplify admissions and fast-track your advancement. Many schools now offer MBAs that prioritize industry experience over standardized test scores.

If cost is a concern, exploring an MBA under 25k provides significant value and return on investment, letting you develop leadership skills without incurring massive debt. Online options also support working professionals who need study flexibility.

Emerging fields like digital marketing offer alternative career pathways for tech-savvy graduates. A social media marketing online degree is ideal for those interested in the ever-evolving digital landscape and brand communication.

Additionally, if you’re interested in customer experience or event management, a online hospitality degree can open up leadership roles in a dynamic industry. The flexibility of online learning makes it easier to build a specialized skillset while balancing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Abbas Rajabifard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles