World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
62
Citations
17881
World Ranking
2868
National Ranking
25

George Vosselman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Vosselman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 264 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

George Vosselman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Vosselman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

George Vosselman is affiliated with the University of Twente in the Netherlands. Their research activity is mainly centered in the fields of Computer Science and Engineering, with a strong emphasis on subfields such as Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Environmental Engineering, Geology, Aerospace Engineering, and Computational Mechanics.

The main topics covered by their work include:

  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Advanced Vision and Imaging

Vosselman has contributed numerous publications to several frequent venues, notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
  • ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
  • Remote Sensing
  • The "international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences

Recent selected papers from Vosselman's research include:

  • "UAVid: A semantic segmentation dataset for UAV imagery" (2020), published in ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
  • "Indoor 3D reconstruction from point clouds for optimal routing in complex buildings to support disaster management" (2020), published in Automation in Construction
  • "Active and incremental learning for semantic ALS point cloud segmentation" (2020), published in ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
  • "Post-Disaster Building Damage Detection from Earth Observation Imagery Using Unsupervised and Transferable Anomaly Detecting Generative Adversarial Networks" (2020), published in Remote Sensing
  • "Innovative Remote Sensing Methodologies for Kenyan Land Tenure Mapping" (2020), published in Remote Sensing

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated extensively with George Vosselman include:

  • Michael Ying Yang
  • Francesco Nex
  • Norman Kerle
  • Sander Oude Elberink
  • Claudio Persello

Best Publications

  • Experimental comparison of filter algorithms for bare-Earth extraction from airborne laser scanning point clouds

    George Sithole;George Vosselman

  • Airborne and Terrestrial Laser Scanning

    George Vosselman;Hans-Gerd Maas

  • SLOPE BASED FILTERING OF LASER ALTIMETRY DATA

    George Vosselman

  • Segmentation of point clouds using smoothness constraints

    T. Rabbani;F.A. van den Heuvel;G. Vosselman

  • 3D BUILDING MODEL RECONSTRUCTION FROM POINT CLOUDS AND GROUND PLANS

    George Vosselman;Sander Dijkman

  • Two algorithms for extracting building models from raw laser altimetry data

    Hans-Gerd Maas;George Vosselman

  • Recognising structure in laser scanning point clouds

    G. Vosselman;B.G.H. Gorte;G. Sithole;T. Rabbani

  • Knowledge based reconstruction of building models from terrestrial laser scanning data

    Shi Pu;George Vosselman

  • Recognizing basic structures from mobile laser scanning data for road inventory studies

    Shi Pu;Martin Rutzinger;George Vosselman;Sander Oude Elberink

  • Reconstruction of 3D building models from aerial images and maps

    Ildiko Suveg;George Vosselman

  • UAVid: A semantic segmentation dataset for UAV imagery

    Ye Lyu;George Vosselman;Gui-Song Xia;Alper Yilmaz

  • Disaster damage detection through synergistic use of deep learning and 3D point cloud features derived from very high resolution oblique aerial images, and multiple-kernel-learning

    Anand Vetrivel;Markus Gerke;Norman Kerle;Francesco Nex

  • Road tracing by profile matching and Kaiman filtering

    George Vosselman;Jurrien de Knecht

  • Lite-Mono: A Lightweight CNN and Transformer Architecture for Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimation

    Unknown

  • An integrated approach for modelling and global registration of point clouds

    Tahir Rabbani;Sander Dijkman;Frank van den Heuvel;George Vosselman

  • Automatic extraction of building features from terrestrial laser scanning

    Shi Pu;G. Vosselman

  • FILTERING OF AIRBORNE LASER SCANNER DATA BASED ON SEGMENTED POINT CLOUDS

    George Sithole;George Vosselman

  • Report: ISPRS Comparison of Filters

    George Sithole;George Vosselman

  • Review of automatic feature extraction from high-resolution optical sensor data for UAV-based cadastral mapping

    Sophie Crommelinck;Rohan Bennett;Markus Gerke;Francesco Nex

  • Relational matching

    G. Vosselman;J. Hartmanis;G. Goos

  • Building reconstruction by target based graph matching on incomplete laser data: analysis and limitations.

    Sander Oude Elberink;George Vosselman

Frequent Co-Authors

Claudio Persello
Claudio Persello University of Twente
Francesco Nex
Francesco Nex University of Twente
Jantien Stoter
Jantien Stoter Delft University of Technology
Michael Ying Yang
Michael Ying Yang University of Bath
Norman Kerle
Norman Kerle University of Twente
Sisi Zlatanova
Sisi Zlatanova University of New South Wales
Gui-Song Xia
Gui-Song Xia Wuhan University
Juha Hyyppä
Juha Hyyppä Finnish Geospatial Research Institute
Hugo Ledoux
Hugo Ledoux Delft University of Technology
Harri Kaartinen
Harri Kaartinen University of Turku

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and career options. Many students look for flexible, cost-effective ways to further their education while balancing work and life. For those prioritizing affordability, searching for the most affordable online mba programs can be a smart choice—especially if you are considering future management or leadership roles.

If speed is important, some students opt for one year online masters programs. These accelerated options allow you to upgrade your qualifications quickly, helping you reach your career goals faster. Others may be interested in finding online programs that pay well, ensuring a strong return on investment and competitive salaries after graduation.

The rise of artificial intelligence has also driven demand for specialized skills. Students passionate about AI should consider the best online ai degree programs to stay ahead in this evolving field. Researching these options can help you find the perfect next step for your academic and professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing George Vosselman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles