World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kourosh Khoshelham

Kourosh Khoshelham

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
9093
World Ranking
8694
National Ranking
265

Kourosh Khoshelham publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kourosh Khoshelham sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 216 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Kourosh Khoshelham D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kourosh Khoshelham sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kourosh Khoshelham is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Engineering and Computer Science, with notable contributions in subfields such as Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Geology, Environmental Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, and Civil and Structural Engineering.

Their work extensively covers topics related to 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage, Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications, Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization, Augmented Reality Applications, Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods, Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring, and Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies.

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
  • The "international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
  • Remote Sensing

Khoshelham has co-authored numerous papers with collaborators such as Martin Tomko, Stephan Winter, Debaditya Acharya, Marko Radanović, and Hang Zhao.

Some of their recent published papers include:

  • "Real-time monitoring of construction sites: Sensors, methods, and applications," 2022, Automation in Construction
  • "InSiNet: a deep convolutional approach to skin cancer detection and segmentation," 2022, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
  • "Individual tree extraction from urban mobile laser scanning point clouds using deep pointwise direction embedding," 2021, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
  • "A digital twin approach for geometric quality assessment of as-built prefabricated façades," 2021, Journal of Building Engineering
  • "MS-RRFSegNet: Multiscale Regional Relation Feature Segmentation Network for Semantic Segmentation of Urban Scene Point Clouds," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Khoshelham has also contributed to book publications, including a work published by Springer Nature titled "Proceedings of UASG 2019" released in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Accuracy and Resolution of Kinect Depth Data for Indoor Mapping Applications

    Kourosh Khoshelham;Sander Oude Elberink

  • Accuracy Analysis of Kinect Depth Data

    K. Khoshelham

  • ACCURACY ANALYSIS OF KINECT DEPTH DATA

    K Khoshelham

  • Real-time monitoring of construction sites: Sensors, methods, and applications

    Unknown

  • Performance evaluation of automated approaches to building detection in multi-source aerial data

    Kourosh Khoshelham;Carla Nardinocchi;Emanuele Frontoni;Adriano Mancini

  • Indoor Localization Improved by Spatial Context—A Survey

    Fuqiang Gu;Xuke Hu;Milad Ramezani;Debaditya Acharya

  • Effect of slope on treetop detection using a LiDAR Canopy Height Model

    Anahita Khosravipour;Andrew K. Skidmore;Tiejun Wang;Martin Isenburg

  • Locomotion Activity Recognition Using Stacked Denoising Autoencoders

    Fuqiang Gu;Kourosh Khoshelham;Shahrokh Valaee;Jianga Shang

  • Robust and Accurate Smartphone-Based Step Counting for Indoor Localization

    Fuqiang Gu;Kourosh Khoshelham;Jianga Shang;Fangwen Yu

  • Accurate Step Length Estimation for Pedestrian Dead Reckoning Localization Using Stacked Autoencoders

    Fuqiang Gu;Kourosh Khoshelham;Chunyang Yu;Jianga Shang

  • BIM-PoseNet: Indoor camera localisation using a 3D indoor model and deep learning from synthetic images

    Debaditya Acharya;Kourosh Khoshelham;Stephan Winter

  • Extending generalized hough transform to detect 3D objects in laser range data

    Kourosh Khoshelham

  • 3D modeling of building indoor spaces and closed doors from imagery and point clouds

    Lucía Díaz-Vilariño;Kourosh Khoshelham;Joaquín Martínez-Sánchez;Pedro Arias

  • THE ISPRS BENCHMARK ON INDOOR MODELLING

    K. Khoshelham;L. Díaz Vilariño;L. Díaz Vilariño;M. Peter;Z. Kang

  • Assessment of relative accuracy of AHN-2 laser scanning data using planar features.

    Corné van der Sande;Sylvie Soudarissanane;Kourosh Khoshelham

  • 3D Modelling of interior spaces : learning the language of indoor architecture

    K. Khoshelham;L. Díaz-Vilariño

  • Evaluation of a LIDAR Land-Based Mobile Mapping System for Monitoring Sandy Coasts

    M. Bitenc;R.C. Lindenbergh;K. Khoshelham;A.P. Van Waarden

  • A digital twin approach for geometric quality assessment of as-built prefabricated facades

    Ha Tran;Tuan Ngoc Nguyen;Philip Christopher;Dac-Khuong Bui

  • Shape Grammar Approach to 3D Modeling of Indoor Environments Using Point Clouds

    H. Tran;K. Khoshelham;A. Kealy;L. Díaz-Vilariño

  • Influence of range measurement noise on roughness characterization of rock surfaces using terrestrial laser scanning

    Kourosh Khoshelham;Kourosh Khoshelham;Dogan Altundag;Dominique Ngan-Tillard;Massimo Menenti

  • RAIL TRACK DETECTION AND MODELLING IN MOBILE LASER SCANNER DATA

    S.J. Oude Elberink;K. Khoshelham;M. Arastounia;D. Díaz Benito

  • Real-time image-based parking occupancy detection using deep learning

    Debaditya Acharya;Weilin Yan;Kourosh Khoshelham

Frequent Co-Authors

Clive S. Fraser
Clive S. Fraser University of Melbourne
Stephan Winter
Stephan Winter University of Melbourne
Shahrokh Valaee
Shahrokh Valaee University of Toronto
Massimo Menenti
Massimo Menenti Delft University of Technology
Zhilin Li
Zhilin Li Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Majid Sarvi
Majid Sarvi University of Melbourne
Devis Tuia
Devis Tuia École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Henrique Lorenzo
Henrique Lorenzo Universidade de Vigo
Abbas Rajabifard
Abbas Rajabifard University of Melbourne
George Vosselman
George Vosselman University of Twente

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens the door to several alternative online programs and career routes. One popular choice is pursuing an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering, which blends well with computer science foundations and leads to strong job prospects in high-tech industries.

For those looking to quickly boost their credentials, consider exploring quick certifications that pay well. These short programs offer practical skills and can rapidly improve employability, especially in IT, networking, or data analysis fields.

If you’re aiming for advanced qualifications, there are now shortest masters degree programs online that allow you to graduate in less than two years. These accelerated tracks make it easier to balance work and study, allowing for quicker career advancement.

Finally, consider which graduate qualifications will give you the most job security. Learning about which master's degree is most in demand in usa can help you select a pathway that’s aligned with current and future employer needs.

Best Scientists Citing Kourosh Khoshelham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles