World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Spain
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
53
Citations
8000
World Ranking
4928
National Ranking
64

Pedro Arias publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pedro Arias sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 204 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Pedro Arias D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pedro Arias sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Spain Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Spain Leader Award

Overview

Pedro Arias is affiliated with the Universidade de Vigo in Spain and specializes in research areas intersecting Engineering and Environmental Science. Their scholarly work has a strong emphasis on subfields such as Geology, Environmental Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Building and Construction, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The scientist's research extensively covers topics related to 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage, Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications, Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring, Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization, Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques, as well as Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies and 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications.

Pedro Arias has contributed to multiple frequently recognized publication venues, notably:

  • The "International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences/International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
  • CHEST Journal
  • Automation in Construction
  • Remote Sensing
  • ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences

Notable recent papers authored by or associated with Pedro Arias include:

  • "Mobile indoor mapping technologies: A review," 2020, published in Automation in Construction
  • "Thermographic methodologies used in infrastructure inspection: A review-Post-processing procedures," 2020, published in Applied Energy
  • "Point cloud semantic segmentation of complex railway environments using deep learning," 2022, published in Automation in Construction
  • "Scanning Technologies to Building Information Modelling: A Review," 2022, published in Infrastructures
  • "Introduction of Deep Learning in Thermographic Monitoring of Cultural Heritage and Improvement by Automatic Thermogram Pre-Processing Algorithms," 2021, published in Sensors

Pedro Arias frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Joaquín Martínez-Sánchez, Jesús Balado, Zhouyan Qiu, S. Lagüela, and Roi Otero. These collaborations have contributed to a diverse range of publications within the scope of their research interests.

Best Publications

  • Review of mobile mapping and surveying technologies

    I. Puente;H. González-Jorge;J. Martínez-Sánchez;P. Arias

  • Historic bridge modelling using laser scanning, ground penetrating radar and finite element methods in the context of structural dynamics

    Izabela Lubowiecka;Julia Armesto;Pedro Arias;Henrique Lorenzo

  • Metrological evaluation of Microsoft Kinect and Asus Xtion sensors

    H. Gonzalez-Jorge;B. Riveiro;E. Vazquez-Fernandez;J. Martínez-Sánchez

  • Terrestrial laser scanning and limit analysis of masonry arch bridges

    B. Riveiro;P. Morer;P. Arias;I. de Arteaga

  • Quantifying the influence of rain in LiDAR performance

    A. Filgueira;H. González-Jorge;S. Lagüela;S. Lagüela;L. Díaz-Vilariño;L. Díaz-Vilariño

  • Control of structural problems in cultural heritage monuments using close-range photogrammetry and computer methods

    P. Arias;J. Herráez;H. Lorenzo;C. Ordóñez

  • Approach to identify cracking in asphalt pavement using GPR and infrared thermographic methods: Preliminary findings

    M. Solla;S. Lagüela;H. González-Jorge;P. Arias

  • Low-cost aerial unit for outdoor inspection of building façades

    D. Roca;S. Lagüela;L. Díaz-Vilariño;J. Armesto

  • Metrological comparison between Kinect I and Kinect II sensors

    H. Gonzalez-Jorge;P. Rodríguez-Gonzálvez;J. Martínez-Sánchez;D. González-Aguilera

  • Review of Laser Scanning Technologies and Their Applications for Road and Railway Infrastructure Monitoring

    Mario Soilán;Ana Sánchez-Rodríguez;Pablo del Río-Barral;Carlos Perez-Collazo

  • Digital photogrammetry, GPR and computational analysis of structural damages in a mediaeval bridge

    P. Arias;J. Armesto;D. Di-Capua;R. González-Drigo

  • Modelling masonry arches shape using terrestrial laser scanning data and nonparametric methods

    J. Armesto;Javier Roca-Pardiñas;H. Lorenzo;P. Arias

  • 4-Plane congruent sets for automatic registration of as-is 3D point clouds with 3D BIM models

    Martín Bueno;Frédéric Bosché;Higinio González-Jorge;Joaquín Martínez-Sánchez

  • Terrestrial laser scanning used to determine the geometry of a granite boulder for stability analysis purposes

    J. Armesto;C. Ordóñez;L. Alejano;P. Arias

  • Photogrammetric 3D modelling and mechanical analysis of masonry arches: An approach based on a discontinuous model of voussoirs

    B. Riveiro;J.C. Caamaño;P. Arias;E. Sanz

  • Segmentation and classification of road markings using MLS data

    Mario Soilán;Belén Riveiro;Joaquín Martínez-Sánchez;Pedro Arias

  • Traffic sign detection in MLS acquired point clouds for geometric and image-based semantic inventory

    Mario Soilán;Belén Riveiro;Joaquín Martínez-Sánchez;Pedro Arias

  • Automatic detection of zebra crossings from mobile LiDAR data

    B. Riveiro;H. González-Jorge;J. Martínez-Sánchez;L. Díaz-Vilariño

  • Energy efficiency studies through 3D laser scanning and thermographic technologies

    S. Lagüela;J. Martínez;J. Armesto;P. Arias

  • Calibration and verification of thermographic cameras for geometric measurements

    S. Lagüela;H. González-Jorge;J. Armesto;P. Arias

  • 3D modeling of building indoor spaces and closed doors from imagery and point clouds

    Lucía Díaz-Vilariño;Kourosh Khoshelham;Joaquín Martínez-Sánchez;Pedro Arias

  • Automation of thermographic 3D modelling through image fusion and image matching techniques

    S. Lagüela;J. Armesto;P. Arias;J. Herráez

Frequent Co-Authors

Julia Armesto
Julia Armesto Universidade de Vigo
Belén Riveiro
Belén Riveiro Universidade de Vigo
Henrique Lorenzo
Henrique Lorenzo Universidade de Vigo
Diego González-Aguilera
Diego González-Aguilera University of Salamanca
Maria Varela
Maria Varela Complutense University of Madrid
Paulo B. Lourenço
Paulo B. Lourenço University of Minho
Kourosh Khoshelham
Kourosh Khoshelham University of Melbourne
Burcu Akinci
Burcu Akinci Carnegie Mellon University
Leandro R. Alejano
Leandro R. Alejano Universidade de Vigo
Frédéric Bosché
Frédéric Bosché University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring fastest online degree options has become popular among students seeking a quicker route to employment in the tech industry. Many universities now offer accelerated Computer Science programs, allowing you to earn a valuable qualification in less time.

With the rapid rise of artificial intelligence, pursuing one of the best AI masters programs online can lead to innovative career opportunities. These programs are designed for flexibility, making it easier for working professionals to upskill without pausing their careers.

For students evaluating their long-term prospects, it’s wise to consider the best college degrees for the future. Computer Science continuously ranks among the top degrees, thanks to its versatility and relevance in today's job market.

If balancing academics and personal commitments is a concern, research shows there are easiest online masters paths that still offer solid career advantages. Whether you’re aiming for rapid completion or specialized expertise, online study opens up diverse and accessible opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Pedro Arias

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles