World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Julia Armesto

Julia Armesto

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 33 9480 9118 224 221 95 3398

Julia Armesto publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Julia Armesto between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Julia Armesto published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2012. 8 of the 112 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2012. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 4 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 2 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 5 publications
2004 2025

112 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Julia Armesto: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 0
2006 2
2007 7
2008 2
2009 11
2010 13
2011 12
2012 15
2013 8
2014 6
2015 1
2016 4
2017 1
2018 2
2019 3
2020 3
2021 3
2022 3
2023 7
2024 3
2025 5
Total 112
Download as CSV

Julia Armesto publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia Armesto sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 88–97 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 95 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259 95
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Julia Armesto D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia Armesto sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189 33
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Julia Armesto is affiliated with the Universidade de Vigo in Spain. Their research primarily spans the field of Environmental Science, with a focus on Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, and Ecology.

Their work covers several key topics including:

  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Forest ecology and management
  • Forest Insect Ecology and Management

Frequent publication venues for Armesto's research include:

  • Remote Sensing
  • Forests
  • Geocarto International
  • ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
  • Trees

Their recent papers reflect research related to tree detection, forest monitoring, and remote sensing technologies. Selected recent papers include:

  • Individual Tree Detection in a Eucalyptus Plantation Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-LiDAR, 2020, Remote Sensing
  • Forest Land Cover Mapping at a Regional Scale Using Multi-Temporal Sentinel-2 Imagery and RF Models, 2021, Remote Sensing
  • Automatic tree detection and attribute characterization using portable terrestrial lidar, 2023, Trees
  • Automatic forest change detection through a bi-annual time series of satellite imagery: Toward production of an integrated land cover map, 2023, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
  • Automatic differentiation of Eucalyptus species through Sentinel-2 images, Worldview-3 images and LiDAR data, 2023, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing

Armesto has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Juan Picos
  • Laura Alonso
  • Ana Solares-Canal
  • Thais Rincón
  • Guillermo Bastos

Best Publications

  • Historic bridge modelling using laser scanning, ground penetrating radar and finite element methods in the context of structural dynamics

    Izabela Lubowiecka;Julia Armesto;Pedro Arias;Henrique Lorenzo

  • Low-cost aerial unit for outdoor inspection of building façades

    D. Roca;S. Lagüela;L. Díaz-Vilariño;J. Armesto

  • Automatic thermographic and RGB texture of as-built BIM for energy rehabilitation purposes

    S. Lagüela;L. Díaz-Vilariño;J. Martínez;J. Armesto

  • Digital photogrammetry, GPR and computational analysis of structural damages in a mediaeval bridge

    P. Arias;J. Armesto;D. Di-Capua;R. González-Drigo

  • Automatic dendrometry: Tree detection, tree height and diameter estimation using terrestrial laser scanning

    Carlos Cabo;Celestino Ordóñez;Carlos A. López-Sánchez;Julia Armesto

  • Modelling masonry arches shape using terrestrial laser scanning data and nonparametric methods

    J. Armesto;Javier Roca-Pardiñas;H. Lorenzo;P. Arias

  • Terrestrial laser scanning used to determine the geometry of a granite boulder for stability analysis purposes

    J. Armesto;C. Ordóñez;L. Alejano;P. Arias

  • Nano-Inclusions Applied in Cement-Matrix Composites: A Review

    Guillermo Bastos;Faustino Patiño-Barbeito;Faustino Patiño-Cambeiro;Julia Armesto

  • Energy efficiency studies through 3D laser scanning and thermographic technologies

    S. Lagüela;J. Martínez;J. Armesto;P. Arias

  • Calibration and verification of thermographic cameras for geometric measurements

    S. Lagüela;H. González-Jorge;J. Armesto;P. Arias

  • FEM modeling of structures based on close range digital photogrammetry

    Julia Armesto;Izabela Lubowiecka;Celestino Ordóñez;Fernando I. Rial

  • Automation of thermographic 3D modelling through image fusion and image matching techniques

    S. Lagüela;J. Armesto;P. Arias;J. Herráez

  • Novel approach to 3D thermography and energy efficiency evaluation

    D. González-Aguilera;P. Rodriguez-Gonzalvez;J. Armesto;S. Lagüela

  • Low-cost documentation of traditional agro-industrial buildings by close-range photogrammetry

    P. Arias;C. Ordóñez;H. Lorenzo;J. Herraez

  • Individual Tree Detection in a Eucalyptus Plantation Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-LiDAR

    Juan Picos;Guillermo Bastos;Daniel Míguez;Laura Alonso

  • Non-destructive approach for the generation and thermal characterization of an as-built BIM

    S. Lagüela;L. Díaz-Vilariño;J. Armesto;P. Arias

  • Measuring building façades with a low-cost close-range photogrammetry system

    Celestino Ordóñez;Joaquín Martínez;Pedro Arias;Julia Armesto

  • Standard artifact for the geometric verification of terrestrial laser scanning systems

    H. González-Jorge;B. Riveiro;J. Armesto;P. Arias

  • Error analysis of terrestrial laser scanning data by means of spherical statistics and 3D graphs.

    Aurora Cuartero;Julia Armesto;Pablo García Rodríguez;Pedro Arias

  • From laser point clouds to surfaces: Statistical nonparametric methods for three-dimensional reconstruction

    J. Roca-Pardiñas;H. Lorenzo;P. Arias;J. Armesto

  • Forestry applications of ground-penetrating radar

    H. Lorenzo;V. Pérez-Gracia;A. Novo;J. Armesto

  • 3D modeling and section properties of ancient irregular timber structures by means of digital photogrammetry

    Pedro Arias;J. Carlos Caamaño;Henrique Lorenzo;Julia Armesto

  • Automation of Thermographic 3D Modelling through Image Fusion and Image Matching Techniques

    S. Laguela;J. Armesto;H. Gonzalez-Jorge;P. Arias

Frequent Co-Authors

Pedro Arias
Pedro Arias Universidade de Vigo
Henrique Lorenzo
Henrique Lorenzo Universidade de Vigo
Belén Riveiro
Belén Riveiro Universidade de Vigo
Diego González-Aguilera
Diego González-Aguilera University of Salamanca
Leandro R. Alejano
Leandro R. Alejano Universidade de Vigo
Maria Varela
Maria Varela Complutense University of Madrid
Jacobo Porteiro
Jacobo Porteiro Universidade de Vigo
Avideh Zakhor
Avideh Zakhor University of California, Berkeley
Kourosh Khoshelham
Kourosh Khoshelham University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in diversifying their knowledge or expanding their career options beyond engineering and technology, several flexible online degrees are available. These programs are particularly beneficial for those seeking to balance work with study or who need affordable education pathways.

A popular choice for those interested in organizational leadership and staff management is the cheapest online human resources degree. This program can provide a strong foundation in talent acquisition, workplace relations, and HR technologies. For those who wish to enhance their communication and leadership skills, pursuing a masters in communication online offers relevant training for various industries, including tech.

Entrepreneurship and business management are also attractive fields for technology graduates. Earning an mba in entrepreneurship online equips students with essential business strategy and startup knowledge. If standardized exams are a concern, many programs provide an online mba no gmat option—allowing even greater accessibility for ambitious learners seeking to advance their careers.

Best Scientists Citing Julia Armesto

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles