World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
49
Citations
10551
World Ranking
5852
National Ranking
2656

Mani Golparvar-Fard publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mani Golparvar-Fard sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 183 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mani Golparvar-Fard D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mani Golparvar-Fard sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mani Golparvar-Fard is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research is situated primarily within the field of Engineering, with a particular focus on Civil and Structural Engineering, as well as Building and Construction. Additional subfields in their work include Geology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, and Artificial Intelligence.

The primary topics covered in their research include Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring, BIM and Construction Integration, 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage, Occupational Health and Safety Research, Construction Project Management and Performance, Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization, and Manufacturing Process and Optimization.

Recent notable publications by Mani Golparvar-Fard include:

  • Automated Methods for Activity Recognition of Construction Workers and Equipment: State-of-the-Art Review (2020, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management)
  • Human-object interaction recognition for automatic construction site safety inspection (2020, Automation in Construction)
  • Bridge Inspection with Aerial Robots: Automating the Entire Pipeline of Visual Data Capture, 3D Mapping, Defect Detection, Analysis, and Reporting (2020, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering)
  • Vision-Based Construction Worker Activity Analysis Informed by Body Posture (2020, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering)
  • Scan2BIM-NET: Deep Learning Method for Segmentation of Point Clouds for Scan-to-BIM (2021, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management)

Mani Golparvar-Fard has published frequently in several key venues that include:

  • Automation in Construction
  • Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
  • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
  • Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction
  • Construction Research Congress 2020

Their collaborative work often involves a number of frequent co-authors, such as:

  • Yoonhwa Jung
  • Amir Ibrahim
  • Fouad Amer
  • Dominic Roberts
  • Shuai Tang

The scientist's work spans several interconnected domains related to the application of advanced technologies and methodologies in construction and civil engineering, with strong emphases on automation, safety, and digital integration within construction processes. Through multiple publications and collaboration, their contributions reflect active engagement with areas such as activity recognition, site safety inspection, 3D mapping, and deep learning for building information modeling.

Best Publications

  • Visual monitoring of civil infrastructure systems via camera-equipped Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): a review of related works

    Youngjib Ham;Kevin K. Han;Jacob J Lin;Mani Golparvar-Fard

  • Evaluation of image-based modeling and laser scanning accuracy for emerging automated performance monitoring techniques

    Mani Golparvar-Fard;Jeffrey Bohn;Jochen Teizer;Silvio Savarese

  • Automated Progress Monitoring Using Unordered Daily Construction Photographs and IFC-Based Building Information Models

    Mani Golparvar-Fard;Feniosky Peña-Mora;Silvio Savarese

  • Application of D4AR – A 4-Dimensional augmented reality model for automating construction progress monitoring data collection, processing and communication

    Mani Golparvar-Fard;Feniosky Peña-Mora;Silvio Savarese

  • Visualization of construction progress monitoring with 4D simulation model overlaid on time-lapsed photographs

    Mani Golparvar-Fard;Feniosky Peña-Mora;Carlos A. Arboleda;SangHyun Lee

  • Construction performance monitoring via still images, time-lapse photos, and video streams

    Jun Yang;Man-Woo Park;Patricio A. Vela;Mani Golparvar-Fard

  • Vision-based action recognition of earthmoving equipment using spatio-temporal features and support vector machine classifiers

    Mani Golparvar-Fard;Arsalan Heydarian;Juan Carlos Niebles

  • Automated 2D detection of construction equipment and workers from site video streams using histograms of oriented gradients and colors

    Milad Memarzadeh;Mani Golparvar-Fard;Juan Carlos Niebles

  • Target-free approach for vision-based structural system identification using consumer-grade cameras

    Hyungchul Yoon;Hazem Elanwar;Hazem Elanwar;Hajin Choi;Mani Golparvar-Fard

  • Enhancing construction hazard recognition with high-fidelity augmented virtuality

    Alex Albert;Matthew R. Hallowell;Brian Kleiner;Ao Chen

  • Vision-based material recognition for automated monitoring of construction progress and generating building information modeling from unordered site image collections

    Andrey Dimitrov;Mani Golparvar-Fard

  • Appearance-based material classification for monitoring of operation-level construction progress using 4D BIM and site photologs

    Kevin K. Han;Mani Golparvar-Fard

  • Potential of big visual data and building information modeling for construction performance analytics: An exploratory study

    Kevin K. Han;Mani Golparvar-Fard

  • Integrated Sequential As-Built and As-Planned Representation with D4AR Tools in Support of Decision-Making Tasks in the AEC/FM Industry

    Mani Golparvar-Fard;Mani Golparvar-Fard;Mani Golparvar-Fard;Feniosky Peña-Mora;Feniosky Peña-Mora;Feniosky Peña-Mora;Silvio Savarese;Silvio Savarese;Silvio Savarese

  • Segmentation of building point cloud models including detailed architectural/structural features and MEP systems

    Andrey Dimitrov;Mani Golparvar-Fard

  • Image-Based Automated 3D Crack Detection for Post-disaster Building Assessment

    Matthew M. Torok;Mani Golparvar-Fard;Kevin B. Kochersberger

  • Mapping actual thermal properties to building elements in gbXML-based BIM for reliable building energy performance modeling

    Youngjib Ham;Mani Golparvar-Fard

  • Automated Methods for Activity Recognition of Construction Workers and Equipment: State-of-the-Art Review

    Behnam Sherafat;Changbum R. Ahn;Reza Akhavian;Amir H. Behzadan

  • High-precision vision-based mobile augmented reality system for context-aware architectural, engineering, construction and facility management (AEC/FM) applications

    Hyojoon Bae;Mani Golparvar-Fard;Jules White

  • End-to-end vision-based detection, tracking and activity analysis of earthmoving equipment filmed at ground level

    Dominic Roberts;Mani Golparvar-Fard

  • Four-dimensional augmented reality models for interactive visualization and automated construction progress monitoring

    Mani Golparvar-Fard;Feniosky A. Peña-Mora;Silvio Savarese

Frequent Co-Authors

Feniosky Peña-Mora
Feniosky Peña-Mora Columbia University
Khaled El-Rayes
Khaled El-Rayes University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Silvio Savarese
Silvio Savarese Stanford University
Jules White
Jules White Vanderbilt University
Juan Carlos Niebles
Juan Carlos Niebles Stanford University
David Forsyth
David Forsyth University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Martin Fischer
Martin Fischer Stanford University
Timothy Bretl
Timothy Bretl University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Matthew R. Hallowell
Matthew R. Hallowell University of Colorado Boulder
Billie F. Spencer
Billie F. Spencer University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Computer Science degree in the USA opens up numerous online pathways for academic and professional growth. Many students look for the affordable online bachelor's degree options, making it easier to begin a tech career without taking on heavy debt.

For those considering a more specialized field, there are programs like the cheapest engineering degree offerings. These can provide an edge in high-demand areas such as software engineering or data science.

Advancing your career is also possible with higher-level qualifications. Professionals seeking leadership roles may consider affordable emba programs to develop both technical and management skills.

For those interested in fields that intersect with technology, such as information management, pursuing the most affordable online mlis programs can be a strategic choice.

By choosing accredited and cost-effective programs, students can tailor their education to meet specific career goals and adapt to the continually evolving tech landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Mani Golparvar-Fard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles