World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 55 4312 4192 264 262 251 12211

Ioannis Brilakis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ioannis Brilakis between 2001 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ioannis Brilakis published across 26 years, from 2001 to 2026, averaging 15 papers a year. Output peaked at 66 publications in 2025. 68 of the 391 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 66. Peak 66 publications in 2025. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 31 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 39 publications 2025: 66 publications 2026: 2 publications
2001 2026

391 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ioannis Brilakis: publications per year, 2001 to 2026
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 5
2006 8
2007 2
2008 5
2009 16
2010 16
2011 31
2012 19
2013 16
2014 14
2015 17
2016 20
2017 8
2018 17
2019 19
2020 17
2021 9
2022 22
2023 21
2024 39
2025 66
2026 2
Total 391
Download as CSV

Ioannis Brilakis publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ioannis Brilakis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 242–251 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 251 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408 251
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Ioannis Brilakis D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ioannis Brilakis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500 55
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ioannis Brilakis is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields within engineering, with a focus on areas that combine construction technologies and digital integration.

The main fields of study for Ioannis Brilakis include engineering, with significant contributions in the subfields of geology, civil and structural engineering, building and construction, environmental engineering, and industrial and manufacturing engineering.

The scientist's work covers several main topics of interest:

  • 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
  • BIM and Construction Integration
  • 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
  • Digital Transformation in Industry

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Ioannis Brilakis include:

  • Varun Kumar Reja
  • Yuandong Pan
  • Diana Davletshina
  • Lavindra de Silva
  • Mengtian Yin

They have published extensively in various venues related to construction and automation technologies. The frequent publication venues are:

  • Computing in Construction
  • Automation in Construction
  • Proceedings of the ISARC
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge)

Recent papers authored by Ioannis Brilakis include:

  • Construction with digital twin information systems, 2020, Data-Centric Engineering
  • Digital technologies can enhance climate resilience of critical infrastructure, 2021, Climate Risk Management
  • Building Information Modelling, Artificial Intelligence and Construction Tech, 2020, Developments in the Built Environment
  • Enriching geometric digital twins of buildings with small objects by fusing laser scanning and AI-based image recognition, 2022, Automation in Construction
  • Vision-based excavator pose estimation using synthetically generated datasets with domain randomization, 2021, Automation in Construction

Best Publications

  • 3D Semantic Parsing of Large-Scale Indoor Spaces

    Iro Armeni;Ozan Sener;Amir R. Zamir;Helen Jiang

  • Pothole detection in asphalt pavement images

    Christian Koch;Ioannis Brilakis

  • Construction with digital twin information systems

    Rafael Sacks;Ioannis Brilakis;Ergo Pikas;Haiyan Sally Xie

  • State of research in automatic as-built modelling

    Viorica Patraucean;Iro Armeni;Mohammad Nahangi;Jamie Yeung

  • Construction worker detection in video frames for initializing vision trackers

    Man-Woo Park;Ioannis Brilakis

  • Automated vision tracking of project related entities

    Ioannis Brilakis;Man-Woo Park;Gauri Jog

  • Progressive 3D reconstruction of infrastructure with videogrammetry

    Ioannis Brilakis;Habib Fathi;Abbas Rashidi

  • Toward automated generation of parametric BIMs based on hybrid video and laser scanning data

    Ioannis Brilakis;Manolis Lourakis;Rafael Sacks;Silvio Savarese

  • Building Information Modelling, Artificial Intelligence and Construction Tech

    Rafael Sacks;Rafael Sacks;Mark Girolami;Ioannis Brilakis

  • Visual retrieval of concrete crack properties for automated post-earthquake structural safety evaluation

    Zhenhua Zhu;Stephanie German;Ioannis Brilakis

  • Semantic Enrichment for Building Information Modeling

    Michael Belsky;Rafael Sacks;Ioannis Brilakis

  • Rapid entropy-based detection and properties measurement of concrete spalling with machine vision for post-earthquake safety assessments

    Stephanie German;Ioannis Brilakis;Reginald Desroches

  • Digital twinning of existing reinforced concrete bridges from labelled point clusters

    Ruodan Lu;Ruodan Lu;Ioannis Brilakis

  • Automated Pothole Distress Assessment Using Asphalt Pavement Video Data

    Christian Koch;Gauri M. Jog;Ioannis Brilakis

  • Comparison of Image-Based and Time-of-Flight-Based Technologies for Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Infrastructure

    Fei Dai;Abbas Rashidi;Ioannis Brilakis;Patricio Vela

  • Framework of aftershock fragility assessment–case studies: older California reinforced concrete building frames

    Jong-Su Jeon;Reginald DesRoches;Laura N. Lowes;Ioannis Brilakis

  • SeeBridge as next generation bridge inspection: Overview, Information Delivery Manual and Model View Definition

    Rafael Sacks;Amir Kedar;André Borrmann;Ling Ma

  • Achievements and Challenges in Machine Vision-Based Inspection of Large Concrete Structures

    C. Koch;S. German Paal;A. Rashidi;Z. Zhu

  • Fragility curves for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames that exhibit different component response mechanisms

    Jong-Su Jeon;Laura N. Lowes;Reginald DesRoches;Ioannis Brilakis

  • Detection of Structural Components in Point Clouds of Existing RC Bridges

    Ruodan Lu;Ioannis K. Brilakis;Campbell R. Middleton

  • Comparative study of vision tracking methods for tracking of construction site resources

    Man-Woo Park;Atefe Makhmalbaf;Ioannis Brilakis

  • Three-Dimensional Tracking of Construction Resources Using an On-Site Camera System

    Man-Woo Park;Christian Koch;Ioannis Brilakis

Frequent Co-Authors

Patricio A. Vela
Patricio A. Vela Georgia Institute of Technology
Reginald DesRoches
Reginald DesRoches Rice University
Lucio Soibelman
Lucio Soibelman University of Southern California
Rafael Sacks
Rafael Sacks Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Laura N. Lowes
Laura N. Lowes University of Washington
Jong-Su Jeon
Jong-Su Jeon Hanyang University
Burcin Becerik-Gerber
Burcin Becerik-Gerber University of Southern California
Carl T. Haas
Carl T. Haas University of Waterloo
Burcu Akinci
Burcu Akinci Carnegie Mellon University
Silvio Savarese
Silvio Savarese Stanford University

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options in computer science opens up a range of possibilities for different career goals and academic backgrounds. For those starting out, some of the best associates degrees to get offer foundational knowledge and skills, making them a great entry point into tech fields.

If you are considering advanced study, there are cheapest accredited online doctoral programs that are both reputable and budget-friendly for those aiming to reach leadership or research roles.

Choosing the right school is crucial. Many of the best online schools offer flexible, high-quality programs recognized by employers and academic institutions alike.

If your interests lean toward interactive media, pursuing a video game design degree is an exciting pathway. These specialized programs focus on both technical skills and creative development opportunities in a booming industry.

Best Scientists Citing Ioannis Brilakis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles