World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 131 2391 2227 92 91 786 66491

Jan G.P. Tijssen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan G.P. Tijssen between 1979 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan G.P. Tijssen published across 47 years, from 1979 to 2025, averaging 17.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 53 publications in 2013. 19 of the 813 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 53. Peak 53 publications in 2013. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 5 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 19 publications 2003: 25 publications 2004: 22 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 24 publications 2010: 43 publications 2011: 52 publications 2012: 44 publications 2013: 53 publications 2014: 49 publications 2015: 35 publications 2016: 31 publications 2017: 47 publications 2018: 42 publications 2019: 48 publications 2020: 32 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 9 publications
1979 2025

813 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan G.P. Tijssen: publications per year, 1979 to 2025
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 0
1981 1
1982 1
1983 1
1984 3
1985 1
1986 5
1987 9
1988 2
1989 3
1990 3
1991 7
1992 6
1993 9
1994 5
1995 7
1996 6
1997 4
1998 6
1999 9
2000 7
2001 15
2002 19
2003 25
2004 22
2005 18
2006 21
2007 17
2008 19
2009 24
2010 43
2011 52
2012 44
2013 53
2014 49
2015 35
2016 31
2017 47
2018 42
2019 48
2020 32
2021 27
2022 8
2023 7
2024 10
2025 9
Total 813
Download as CSV

Jan G.P. Tijssen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan G.P. Tijssen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 781–800 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 786 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217 786
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jan G.P. Tijssen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan G.P. Tijssen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 130–131 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 131 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179 131
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jan G.P. Tijssen is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a concentration on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics related to cardiovascular health. These include:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Tijssen has contributed to numerous publications in a variety of journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
  • European Heart Journal
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Interventional Cardiology Reviews Research Resources
  • BMJ Case Reports

Their recent papers cover significant topics within cardiology and related interventions. Examples include:

  • "2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of endocarditis" (2023, European Heart Journal)
  • "Leaflet modification before transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients at risk for coronary obstruction: the ShortCut study" (2024, European Heart Journal)
  • "Practical Guide on Left Atrial Appendage Closure for the Non-implanting Physician. An International Consensus Paper" (2024, EP Europace)
  • "Complete 2-Year Results Confirm Bayesian Analysis of the SURTAVI Trial" (2020, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions)
  • "Interdisciplinary management of acute ischaemic stroke: Current evidence training requirements for endovascular stroke treatment: Position Paper from the ESC Council on Stroke and the European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions with the support of the European Board of Neurointervention" (2020, European Heart Journal)

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • David Hildick-Smith
  • Victoria Delgado
  • Nikolaos Bonaros
  • Michal Pazderník
  • Wolfram Doehner

Best Publications

  • Duodenal Infusion of Donor Feces for Recurrent Clostridium difficile

    Els van Nood;Anne Vrieze;Max Nieuwdorp;Susana Fuentes

  • Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: Systematic review of 67 prospective studies.

    Jocelyn Berdowski;Robert A. Berg;Jan G.P. Tijssen;Rudolph W. Koster

  • Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

    Jan B F Hulscher;Johanna W van Sandick;Angela G E M de Boer;Bas P L Wijnhoven

  • Prognostic association of depression following myocardial infarction with mortality and cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis

    Joost P van Melle;Peter de Jonge;Titia A Spijkerman;Jan G P Tijssen

  • Findings From a Randomized Controlled Trial of Fecal Transplantation for Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

    Noortje G. Rossen;Susana Fuentes;Mirjam J. van der Spek;Jan G. Tijssen

  • Incidence of Recurrent Thromboembolic and Bleeding Complications Among Patients With Venous Thromboembolism in Relation to Both Malignancy and Achieved International Normalized Ratio: A Retrospective Analysis

    Barbara A. Hutten;Martin H. Prins;Michael Gent;Jeff Ginsberg

  • Effects of early high-volume continuous venovenous hemofiltration on survival and recovery of renal function in intensive care patients with acute renal failure: A prospective, randomized trial

    Catherine S.C. Bouman;Heleen M. Oudemans-van Straaten;Jan G.P. Tijssen;Durk F. Zandstra

  • Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Dagmar M. Ouweneel;Erlend Eriksen;Krischan D. Sjauw;Ivo M. van Dongen

  • Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis.

    Jan B.F Hulscher;Jan G.P Tijssen;Hugo Obertop;J.Jan B van Lanschot

  • Early Invasive Versus Selectively Invasive Management for Acute Coronary Syndromes

    Robbert J. de Winter;Fons Windhausen;Jan Hein Cornel;Peter H.J.M. Dunselman

  • Long-Term Outcome of a Routine Versus Selective Invasive Strategy in Patients With Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data

    Keith A.A. Fox;Tim C. Clayton;Peter Damman;Stuart J. Pocock

  • Radiofrequency Ablation vs Endoscopic Surveillance for Patients With Barrett Esophagus and Low-Grade Dysplasia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    K. Nadine Phoa;Frederike G. I. van Vilsteren;Bas L. A. M. Weusten;Raf Bisschops

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of intra aortic balloon pump therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: should we change the guidelines?

    Krischan D. Sjauw;Annemarie E. Engström;Marije M. Vis;René J. van der Schaaf

  • Dabigatran vs. placebo in patients with acute coronary syndromes on dual antiplatelet therapy: a randomized, double-blind, phase II trial

    Jonas Oldgren;Andrzej Budaj;Christopher B. Granger;Yasser Khder

  • Acute upper GI bleeding: did anything change? Time trend analysis of incidence and outcome of acute upper GI bleeding between 1993/1994 and 2000.

    M E van Leerdam;E M Vreeburg;E A J Rauws;A A M Geraedts

  • Effect of rate or rhythm control on quality of life in persistent atrial fibrillation. Results from the Rate Control Versus Electrical Cardioversion (RACE) Study.

    Vincent E. Hagens;Adelita V. Ranchor;Eric Van Sonderen;Hans A. Bosker

  • Edoxaban-based versus vitamin K antagonist-based antithrombotic regimen after successful coronary stenting in patients with atrial fibrillation (ENTRUST-AF PCI): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial

    Pascal Vranckx;Marco Valgimigli;Lars Eckardt;Jan Tijssen

  • Outcome parameters for trials in atrial fibrillation: executive summary.

    Paulus Kirchhof;Angelo Auricchio;Jeroen Bax;Harry Crijns

  • Randomised trial of endoscopic balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bileduct stones

    Jacques Jghm Bergman;Erik Aj Rauws;Paul Fockens;Anne-Marie van Berkel

  • The spectrum of adult congenital heart disease in Europe: morbidity and mortality in a 5 year follow-up period. The Euro Heart Survey on adult congenital heart disease.

    Peter Engelfriet;Eric Boersma;Erwin Oechslin;Jan Tijssen

Frequent Co-Authors

Robbert J. de Winter
Robbert J. de Winter University of Amsterdam
Jan J. Piek
Jan J. Piek University of Amsterdam
Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Yoshinobu Onuma
Yoshinobu Onuma University of Galway
Roxana Mehran
Roxana Mehran Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Wilmar M. Wiersinga
Wilmar M. Wiersinga University of Amsterdam
Dirk J. van Veldhuisen
Dirk J. van Veldhuisen University Medical Center Groningen
George Dangas
George Dangas Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Jacques J. Bergman
Jacques J. Bergman University of Amsterdam
Isabelle C. Van Gelder
Isabelle C. Van Gelder University Medical Center Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degree programs and healthcare career paths. Modern online options can help students advance quickly and stay flexible, whether you’re already working in the field or just starting out.

For registered nurses aiming for advanced clinical roles, msn to dnp programs online offer a streamlined route toward top nursing credentials. Pharmacists and those interested in the pharmaceutical industry may consider pharm d online programs, which provide the skills and qualifications necessary to practice at the highest professional level.

Not all medical-related careers require clinical training. Managing patient data is vital, and an him bachelor's degree online prepares you for roles in health information management and administration. Additionally, entering the healthcare workforce quickly is possible with certifications in coding and billing; you can explore the average cost of medical billing and coding program to compare options and plan your investment.

Online degrees make healthcare education more accessible while preparing you for a wide range of in-demand careers within medicine and allied health.

Best Scientists Citing Jan G.P. Tijssen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles