World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Rising Stars

D-Index
38
Citations
7097
World Ranking
717
National Ranking
247

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
7900
World Ranking
8773
National Ranking
1137

Xindong Peng publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xindong Peng sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 92 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Xindong Peng D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xindong Peng sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Xindong Peng is affiliated with the National University of Defense Technology in China. The research work primarily spans the fields of Decision Sciences and Computer Science, with a focus on subfields such as Management Science and Operations Research, Control and Systems Engineering, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Statistics and Probability, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Optimization and Mathematical Programming
  • Fuzzy Systems and Optimization
  • Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory
  • Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
  • Advanced Algebra and Logic
  • Gene expression and cancer classification

Frequent coauthors in the body of work are:

  • Zhigang Luo
  • Haihui Huang
  • Muhammad Akram
  • Harish Garg
  • Wenquan Li

The primary publication venues include:

  • Artificial Intelligence Review
  • International Journal of Intelligent Systems
  • Soft Computing
  • Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems
  • International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems

Recent notable publications by Xindong Peng are:

  • "FUZZY DECISION MAKING METHOD BASED ON COCOSO WITH CRITIC FOR FINANCIAL RISK EVALUATION", 2020, Technological and Economic Development of Economy
  • "A novel interval-valued fuzzy soft decision-making method based on CoCoSo and CRITIC for intelligent healthcare management evaluation", 2021, Soft Computing

Other significant related publications within the coauthor network include:

  • "SLNL: A novel method for gene selection and phenotype classification", 2022, International Journal of Intelligent Systems
  • "A new decision-making model using complex intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators", 2021, Soft Computing
  • "A decision-making algorithm for online shopping using deep-learning-based opinion pairs mining and q-rung orthopair fuzzy interaction Heronian mean operators", 2020, International Journal of Intelligent Systems

Best Publications

  • Some Results for Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets

    Xindong Peng;Yong Yang

  • Fundamental Properties of Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Aggregation Operators

    Xindong Peng;Yong Yang

  • Pythagorean Fuzzy Information Measures and Their Applications

    Xindong Peng;Huiyong Yuan;Yong Yang

  • Pythagorean Fuzzy Choquet Integral Based MABAC Method for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making

    Xindong Peng;Yong Yang

  • Pythagorean fuzzy set: state of the art and future directions

    Xindong Peng;Ganeshsree Selvachandran

  • Exponential operation and aggregation operator for q‐rung orthopair fuzzy set and their decision‐making method with a new score function

    Xindong Peng;Jingguo Dai;Harish Garg

  • Pythagorean fuzzy MCDM method based on CoCoSo and CRITIC with score function for 5G industry evaluation

    Xindong Peng;Xindong Peng;Xiang Zhang;Zhigang Luo

  • Algorithms for interval-valued fuzzy soft sets in stochastic multi-criteria decision making based on regret theory and prospect theory with combined weight

    Xindong Peng;Yong Yang

  • Approaches to single-valued neutrosophic MADM based on MABAC, TOPSIS and new similarity measure with score function

    Xindong Peng;Jingguo Dai

  • Information measures for q‐rung orthopair fuzzy sets

    Xindong Peng;Lin Liu

  • Algorithms for neutrosophic soft decision making based on EDAS, new similarity measure and level soft set

    Xindong Peng;Chong Liu

  • Approaches to Pythagorean Fuzzy Stochastic Multi‐criteria Decision Making Based on Prospect Theory and Regret Theory with New Distance Measure and Score Function

    Xindong Peng;Jingguo Dai

  • Algorithms for interval-valued fuzzy soft sets in emergency decision making based on WDBA and CODAS with new information measure.

    Xindong Peng;Harish Garg

  • FUZZY DECISION MAKING METHOD BASED ON COCOSO WITH CRITIC FOR FINANCIAL RISK EVALUATION

    Xindong Peng;Haihui Huang

  • Fundamental Properties of Pythagorean Fuzzy Aggregation Operators

    Xindong Peng;Huiyong Yuan

  • Research on the assessment of classroom teaching quality with q‐rung orthopair fuzzy information based on multiparametric similarity measure and combinative distance‐based assessment

    Xindong Peng;Jingguo Dai

  • A bibliometric analysis of neutrosophic set: two decades review from 1998 to 2017

    Xindong Peng;Jingguo Dai

  • New similarity measure and distance measure for Pythagorean fuzzy set

    Unknown

  • Algorithms for Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets in Emergency Decision Making Based on Multiparametric Similarity Measures and WDBA

    Xindong Peng;Wenquan Li

  • Multiparametric similarity measures on Pythagorean fuzzy sets with applications to pattern recognition

    Xindong Peng;Harish Garg

  • Pythagorean fuzzy soft MCGDM methods based on TOPSIS, VIKOR and aggregation operators

    Khalid Naeem;Muhammad Riaz;Xindong Peng;Deeba Afzal

  • Hesitant fuzzy soft decision making methods based on WASPAS, MABAC and COPRAS with combined weights

    Xindong Peng;Jingguo Dai

Frequent Co-Authors

Muhammad Akram
Muhammad Akram University of the Punjab
Harish Garg
Harish Garg Thapar University
Florentin Smarandache
Florentin Smarandache University of New Mexico
Samarjit Kar
Samarjit Kar National Institute of Technology Durgapur
Muhammad Riaz
Muhammad Riaz South China Agricultural University
Jianming Zhan
Jianming Zhan Hubei University for Nationalities
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Arunodaya Raj Mishra
Arunodaya Raj Mishra ITM University
Abbas Mardani
Abbas Mardani Qazvin University of Medical Sciences
Pratibha Rani
Pratibha Rani KL University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the tech industry evolves, choosing an online degree can open doors to lucrative and fulfilling career pathways in computer science. Many students are interested in online programs that pay well, offering a cost-effective route to in-demand professions. These include roles in software development, cybersecurity, and data analysis—fields known for strong job prospects and competitive salaries.

Artificial intelligence (AI) continues to be a top choice for those aiming for cutting-edge skills. If you are considering a specialization, explore the best ai masters programs online to gain expertise that sets you apart in today’s job market.

Deciding on the best degree to get can depend on your career ambitions and personal interests. Some students may seek programs that are less time-intensive. In this case, finding the easiest masters degree to get can make advancing your education more accessible.

Overall, carefully researching and comparing programs helps you align your education with your career goals—whether you want a fast, affordable path or specialized expertise in a high-growth field.

Best Scientists Citing Xindong Peng

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles