World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
68
Citations
17782
World Ranking
2476
National Ranking
1436

David V. Budescu publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David V. Budescu sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 186 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David V. Budescu D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David V. Budescu sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

David V. Budescu is affiliated with Fordham University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Decision Sciences, with a particular emphasis on Management Science and Operations Research, General Decision Sciences, Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research, and Social Psychology.

The main topics covered in their work include Forecasting Techniques and Applications, Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics, Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Computational and Text Analysis Methods, Sports Analytics and Performance, and Economic and Environmental Valuation.

Frequent publication venues for David V. Budescu include the Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Decision, Judgment and Decision Making, AI Magazine, and Experimental Economics.

They have collaborated regularly with several coauthors, notably Mark Himmelstein, Pavel Atanasov, David R. Mandel, Hagai Rabinovitch, and Yoella Bereby-Meyer.

The following are some of their recent papers along with the years of publication and venues:

  • A survey of human judgement and quantitative forecasting methods, 2021, Royal Society Open Science
  • Preference for human or algorithmic forecasting advice does not predict if and how it is used, 2022, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
  • Forecasting forecaster accuracy: Contributions of past performance and individual differences, 2021, Judgment and Decision Making
  • The wisdom of many in few: Finding individuals who are as wise as the crowd, 2023, Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Too Much Trust in Group Decisions: Uncovering Hidden Profiles by Groups and Markets, 2020, Organization Science

David V. Budescu was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression.

    David V. Budescu

  • The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression.

    Razia Azen;David V. Budescu

  • Simultaneous Over- and Underconfidence: The Role of Error in Judgment Processes.

    Ido Erev;Thomas S. Wallsten;David V. Budescu

  • Measures of similarity among fuzzy concepts: A comparative analysis☆

    Rami Zwick;Edward Carlstein;David V. Budescu

  • Measuring the Vague Meanings of Probability Terms

    Thomas S. Wallsten;Rami Zwick;Barbara Forsyth;David V. Budescu

  • Improving Communication of Uncertainty in the Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

    David V. Budescu;Stephen Broomell;Han-Hui Por

  • State of the Art—Encoding Subjective Probabilities: A Psychological and Psychometric Review

    Thomas S. Wallsten;David V. Budescu

  • Consistency in interpretation of probabilistic phrases

    David V Budescu;Thomas S Wallsten

  • Identifying Expertise to Extract the Wisdom of Crowds

    David V. Budescu;Eva Chen

  • Decisions based on numerically and verbally expressed uncertainties.

    David V. Budescu;Shalva Weinberg;Thomas S. Wallsten

  • Processing Linguistic Probabilities: General Principles and Empirical Evidence

    David V. Budescu;Thomas S. Wallsten

  • Preferences and reasons for communicating probabilistic information in verbal or numerical terms

    Thomas S. Wallsten;David V. Budescu;Rami Zwick;Steven M. Kemp

  • The interpretation of IPCC probabilistic statements around the world

    David V. Budescu;Han-Hui Por;Stephen B. Broomell;Michael Smithson

  • Effective communication of uncertainty in the IPCC reports

    David V. Budescu;Han-Hui Por;Stephen B. Broomell;Stephen B. Broomell

  • Generation of random series in two-person strictly competitive games

    Amnon Rapoport;David V. Budescu

  • Comparing the calibration and coherence of numerical and verbal probability judgments

    Thomas S. Wallsten;David V. Budescu;Rami Zwick

  • Randomization in individual choice behavior.

    Amnon Rapoport;David V. Budescu

  • Personal experience with climate change predicts intentions to act

    Stephen B. Broomell;David V. Budescu;Han-Hui Por

  • A review of human linguistic probability processing: General principles and empirical evidence

    Thomas S. Wallsten;David V. Budescu

  • Resource dilemmas with environmental uncertainty and asymmetric players

    David V. Budescu;Amnon Rapoport;Ramzi Suleiman

  • Evaluating and Combining Subjective Probability Estimates

    Thomas S. Wallsten;David V. Budescu;Ido Erev;Adele Diederich

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas S. Wallsten
Thomas S. Wallsten University of Maryland, College Park
Amnon Rapoport
Amnon Rapoport University of Arizona
Ido Erev
Ido Erev Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Maya Bar-Hillel
Maya Bar-Hillel Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Valentina Bosetti
Valentina Bosetti Bocconi University
Elke U. Weber
Elke U. Weber Princeton University
Massimo Tavoni
Massimo Tavoni Polytechnic University of Milan
Gary Bornstein
Gary Bornstein Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Matthias Sutter
Matthias Sutter Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
Mark Steyvers
Mark Steyvers University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to many career pathways, including social work, counseling, and educational support roles. Many students consider online degree programs for added flexibility, especially when balancing work or family commitments.

If you are interested in social work, it’s important to know that each state sets its own educational and licensing requirements. For instance, the degree needed to be a social worker in Michigan may differ from what is required elsewhere. Prospective social workers should also review social worker degree requirements in Minnesota and learn about Mississippi education requirements for social workers.

Comparisons like these can help students select the right educational path and ensure their degree will meet licensure needs. For those researching other regions, understanding specific social worker education requirements in Missouri is an essential step.

Online psychology degrees can serve as a solid foundation for these pathways, while state-specific research ensures you meet your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing David V. Budescu

Trending Scientists