What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Law
- Social psychology
- Statistics
His primary scientific interests are in Social psychology, Neuropsychology, Clinical psychology, Hindsight bias and Medical diagnosis.
His studies in Social psychology integrate themes in fields like Cost–benefit analysis and Control.
His research in Cost–benefit analysis intersects with topics in Argument, Debiasing, Association and Ecological validity.
The various areas that Hal R. Arkes examines in his Neuropsychology study include Malingering and Event.
His Hindsight bias study combines topics in areas such as Response bias and Psychiatry.
In his study, Self-concept, Actuarial science, Probabilistic logic and Incentive is strongly linked to Knowledge level, which falls under the umbrella field of Psychiatry.
His most cited work include:
- The Psychology of Sunk Cost (1721 citations)
- Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing. (576 citations)
- The Impact of Serious Illness on Patients' Families (371 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Hal R. Arkes focuses on Social psychology, Cognitive psychology, Family medicine, Decision aids and Prospect theory.
As part of his studies on Social psychology, he often connects relevant subjects like Control.
Hal R. Arkes interconnects Cost–benefit analysis, Debiasing, Preference and Value in the investigation of issues within Cognitive psychology.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Vignette and MEDLINE.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Mental accounting, Econometrics and Demographic economics in addition to Prospect theory.
His Overconfidence effect research integrates issues from Outcome feedback and Neglect.
He most often published in these fields:
- Social psychology (30.56%)
- Cognitive psychology (11.11%)
- Family medicine (8.33%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2009-2021)?
- Social psychology (30.56%)
- Family medicine (8.33%)
- Overconfidence effect (5.56%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of study are Social psychology, Family medicine, Overconfidence effect, Optimism and Race.
His study in Social psychology is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Accident, Insanity and Jury nullification.
His research integrates issues of Pulmonologist and Decision aids in his study of Family medicine.
The Overconfidence effect study combines topics in areas such as Malpractice and Arithmetic.
As a part of the same scientific family, Hal R. Arkes mostly works in the field of Optimism, focusing on Econometrics and, on occasion, Planning fallacy and Feeling.
His study on Race also encompasses disciplines like
- Racism and related Conservatism, Supreme court and Diversity,
- Perception most often made with reference to Higher education.
Between 2009 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Consensus Statement on Perioperative Use of Neuromuscular Monitoring. (84 citations)
- A cross-cultural study of reference point adaptation: Evidence from China, Korea, and the US (70 citations)
- Psychological Research and the Prostate-Cancer Screening Controversy (34 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Law
- Social psychology
- Statistics
Hal R. Arkes mainly focuses on MEDLINE, Overconfidence effect, Social psychology, Decision support system and Neuromuscular monitoring.
His MEDLINE study incorporates themes from Checklist, Transparency and Internet privacy.
His Overconfidence effect research includes elements of Hindsight bias and Malpractice, Medical malpractice.
Many of his studies on Social psychology apply to Test as well.
Hal R. Arkes combines subjects such as Vignette, Locus of control, Decision aids and Knowledge management with his study of Decision support system.
His Neuromuscular monitoring research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Neuromuscular-blocking drug, Physical medicine and rehabilitation and Intensive care medicine.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
