World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
16105
World Ranking
6536
National Ranking
3543

Hal R. Arkes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hal R. Arkes sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 102 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Hal R. Arkes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hal R. Arkes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hal R. Arkes is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple interdisciplinary areas, notably integrating aspects of sociology, political science, statistics, probability, uncertainty, computer vision, pattern recognition, economics, econometrics, and genetics.

The scientist has contributed to several fields of study, with main topics of research including digital media forensic detection, forensic and genetic research, social and intergroup psychology, advanced statistical process monitoring, risk perception and management, meta-analysis and systematic reviews, as well as healthcare policy and management.

Notable recent publications by Hal R. Arkes include:

  • Inconclusives and error rates in forensic science: a signal detection theory approach, 2021, Law Probability and Risk
  • Analysis of Physicians' Probability Estimates of a Medical Outcome Based on a Sequence of Events, 2022, JAMA Network Open
  • Inconclusives are not errors: a rejoinder to Dror, 2022, Law Probability and Risk
  • Inconclusive conclusions in forensic science: rejoinders to Scurich, Morrison, Sinha and Gutierrez, 2022, Law Probability and Risk

Their frequent co-authors include Jonathan J. Koehler, Scott K. Aberegg, Kevin A. Arpin, Andria H. Mehltretter, and Meghan Prusinowski.

The most common venues for publication are:

  • Law Probability and Risk
  • JAMA Network Open
  • Forensic Chemistry
  • Medical Decision Making
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Best Publications

  • The Psychology of Sunk Cost

    Hal R Arkes;Catherine Blumer

  • Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing.

    Hal R. Arkes

  • The sunk cost and Concorde effects: Are humans less rational than lower animals?

    Hal R. Arkes;Peter Ayton

  • Attributions of Implicit Prejudice, or "Would Jesse Jackson 'Fail' the Implicit Association Test?"

    Hal R. Arkes;Philip E. Tetlock

  • Impediments to accurate clinical judgment and possible ways to minimize their impact.

    Hal R. Arkes

  • The Psychology of Windfall Gains

    Hal R. Arkes;Cynthia A. Joyner;Mark V. Pezzo;Jane Gradwohl Nash

  • Eliminating the hindsight bias.

    Hal R. Arkes;David Faust;Thomas J. Guilmette;Kathleen Hart

  • Factors influencing the use of a decision rule in a probabilistic task

    Hal R Arkes;Robyn M Dawes;Caryn Christensen

  • The Role of Potential Loss in the Influence of Affect on Risk-Taking Behavior

    Hal R Arkes;Lisa Tandy Herren;Alice M Isen

  • Hindsight bias among physicians weighing the likelihood of diagnoses.

    Hal R. Arkes;Robert L. Wortmann;Paul D. Saville;Allan R. Harkness

  • Two methods of reducing overconfidence

    Hal R Arkes;Caryn Christensen;Cheryl Lai;Catherine Blumer

  • Neuropsychologists' capacity to detect adolescent malingerers.

    David Faust;Kathleen J. Hart;Thomas J. Guilmette;Hal R. Arkes

  • Determinants of judged validity.

    Hal R Arkes;Lawrence E Boehm;Gang Xu

  • The psychology of waste.

    Hal R. Arkes

  • The generality of the relation between familiarity and judged validity.

    Hal R. Arkes;Catherine Hackett;Larry Boehm

  • Reference Point Adaptation: Tests in the Domain of Security Trading

    Hal R. Arkes;David Hirshleifer;Danling Jiang;Sonya Lim

  • Estimates of contingency between two dichotomous variables.

    Hal R. Arkes;Allan R. Harkness

  • Systematic errors in medical decision making: - Judgment limitations

    Neal V. Dawson;Hal R. Arkes

  • Psychological theories of motivation

    Hal R. Arkes;John P. Garske

  • Overconfidence in Judgmental Forecasting

    Hal R. Arkes

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip E. Tetlock
Philip E. Tetlock University of Pennsylvania
David Faust
David Faust University of Rhode Island
Scott O. Lilienfeld
Scott O. Lilienfeld Emory University
Ralph Hertwig
Ralph Hertwig Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Barbara A. Mellers
Barbara A. Mellers University of Pennsylvania
Daniel J. Simons
Daniel J. Simons University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Alexandra M. Freund
Alexandra M. Freund University of Zurich
Elke U. Weber
Elke U. Weber Princeton University
M. Gareth Gaskell
M. Gareth Gaskell University of York
Dolores Albarracín
Dolores Albarracín University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens up a wide range of online degree options and professional pathways. Many students are interested in advancing their careers through specialized qualifications, such as becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). The BCBA credential is highly valued in fields like behavioral health, education, and autism support services, and there are clear education and certification steps no matter where you live.

To help guide your career goals, it's helpful to understand specific requirements in different locations. For example, you can review Spokane bcba education requirements to see what’s needed in Washington State. In the Midwest, you might want to learn about how to become a bcba in St. Louis. The qualifications can vary by region, and students in Florida should explore the bcba certification requirements in St. Petersburg. Similarly, those in California can check the Stockton bcba education requirements.

Most pathways involve completing a relevant graduate degree, supervised fieldwork, and passing the BCBA exam. Many US universities offer flexible online programs to help you meet these requirements while balancing work and other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Hal R. Arkes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles