World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 61 1352 1202 55 52 247 15094

Peer Scheepers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peer Scheepers between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peer Scheepers published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 6.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2004. 7 of the 269 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2004. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 7 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 7 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 4 publications
1986 2025

269 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peer Scheepers: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 7
1990 1
1991 7
1992 3
1993 4
1994 1
1995 7
1996 3
1997 2
1998 7
1999 4
2000 4
2001 8
2002 13
2003 14
2004 16
2005 9
2006 7
2007 10
2008 12
2009 9
2010 7
2011 5
2012 9
2013 15
2014 10
2015 9
2016 6
2017 11
2018 9
2019 9
2020 5
2021 5
2022 7
2023 6
2024 3
2025 4
Total 269
Download as CSV

Peer Scheepers publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peer Scheepers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 244–253 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 247 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167 247
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Peer Scheepers D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peer Scheepers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86 61
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Peer Scheepers is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands and has an extensive publication record in the social sciences, particularly focusing on sociology and political science. They have contributed 51 publications in the broader field of social sciences, with 31 specifically related to sociology and political science, and 10 in political science and international relations. Additional areas of study include demography, general health professions, and communication.

Their research addresses a range of topics interconnected with society and group dynamics. Major themes include social and intergroup psychology, religion and society interactions, and migration, refugees, and integration. Other prominent subjects in their work are electoral systems and political participation, the nonprofit sector and volunteering, and social capital and networks.

Peer Scheepers has published several recent papers that illustrate the breadth of their interests. These include:

  • "Support for interreligious conflict in Indonesia" (2021) in the Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology
  • "Has the terrorist attack on Charlie Hebdo fuelled resistance towards Muslim immigrants in Europe? Results from a natural experiment in six European countries" (2022) in Acta Sociologica
  • "Assessing the 'Why' in Volunteering for Refugees: Exploring Volunteer Motivations" (2023) in VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations
  • "Patterns of exclusion of ethno-religious minorities: The ethno-religious hierarchy across European countries and social categories within these countries" (2021) in International Journal of Intercultural Relations
  • "Nationalism in Europe: Trends and Cross-national Differences in Public Opinion" (2020) in European Review

Peer Scheepers frequently collaborates with several co-authors, reflecting ongoing partnerships in their research. Notable co-authors include Marcel Lubbers, Maikel Meijeren, Michael Savelkoul, Maurice Gesthuizen, and Paul Vermeer.

Their work often appears in recurring publication venues, highlighting their research focus areas. These venues include:

  • Mens & Maatschappij
  • Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
  • International Journal of Public Opinion Research
  • Social Science Quarterly
  • Review of Religious Research

Best Publications

  • Extreme right-wing voting in Western Europe

    Marcel Lubbers;Mérove Gijsberts;Peer Scheepers

  • Ethnic Exclusionism in European Countries. Public Opposition to Civil Rights for Legal Migrants as a Response to Perceived Ethnic Threat

    Peer Scheepers;Mérove Gijsberts;Marcel Coenders

  • The Effect of Education on Nationalism and Ethnic Exclusionism: An International Comparison

    Marcel Coenders;Peer Scheepers

  • The relationship between outgroup size and anti-outgroup attitudes: A theoretical synthesis and empirical test of group threat- and intergroup contact theory

    Elmar Schlueter;Peer Scheepers

  • Ethnic diversity and social capital in Europe: Tests of Putnam's thesis in European countries

    Maurice Gesthuizen;Tom van der Meer;Peer Scheepers

  • Anti-Muslim attitudes in the Netherlands: Tests of contradictory hypotheses derived from ethnic competition theory and intergroup contact theory

    Michael Savelkoul;Peer Scheepers;Jochem Tolsma;Louk Hagendoorn

  • Support for ethnic discrimination in the Netherlands 1979-1993: Effects of period, cohort, and individual characteristics

    Marcel Coenders;Peer Scheepers

  • Individual and contextual characteristics of the German extreme Right–Wing vote in the 1990s. A test of complementary theories

    Marcel Lubbers;Peer Scheepers

  • Disapproval of Homosexuality: Comparative Research on Individual and National Determinants of Disapproval of Homosexuality in 20 European Countries

    Hanneke van den Akker;Rozemarijn van der Ploeg;Peer Scheepers

  • Euro-scepticism and radical right-wing voting in Europe, 2002-2008: Social cleavages, socio-political attitudes and contextual characteristics determining voting for the radical right

    Han Werts;Peer Scheepers;Marcel Lubbers

  • Religiosity and prejudice against ethnic movements in Europe: Cross-national tests on a controversial relationship

    P.L.H. Scheepers;M.I.L. Gijsberts

  • Divergent trends of euroscepticism in countries and regions of the European Union

    Marcel Lubbers;Peer Scheepers

  • Exposure to Newspapers and Attitudes toward Ethnic Minorities: A Longitudinal Analysis

    Maurice Vergeer;Marcel Lubbers;Peer Scheepers

  • Education and ethnic prejudice in Europe: explanations for cross-national variances in the educational effect on ethnic prejudice

    Peer Scheepers;Mérove Gijsberts

  • Education, Religiosity and Moral Attitudes: Explaining Cross-National Effect Differences

    Peer Scheepers;Manfred Te Grotenhuis;Frans Van Der Slik

  • More than Two Decades of Changing Ethnic Attitudes in the Netherlands

    Marcel Coenders;Marcel Lubbers;Peer Scheepers;Maykel Verkuyten

  • Explaining the Trend in Extreme Right‐Wing Voting: Germany 1989–1998

    Marcel Lubbers;Peer Scheepers

  • Political versus Instrumental Euro-scepticism: Mapping Scepticism in European Countries and Regions

    Marcel Lubbers;Peer Scheepers

  • Changes in Resistance to the Social Integration of Foreigners in Germany 1980–2000: Individual and Contextual Determinants

    Marcel Coenders;Peer Scheepers

  • Welfare States And Dimensions Of Social Capital: Cross-national Comparisons Of Social Contacts In European Countries

    Peer Scheepers;Manfred te Grotenhuis;John Gelissen

  • Why the more educated are less inclined to keep ethnic distance : An empirical test of four explanations

    P.L.H. Scheepers;P.J.C. Sleegers

  • Blatant and subtle prejudice: dimensions, determinants, and consequences; some comments on Pettigrew and Meertens

    Marcel Coenders;Peer Scheepers;Paul M. Sniderman;Geneviève Verberk

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcel Lubbers
Marcel Lubbers Utrecht University
Sabine A. E. Geurts
Sabine A. E. Geurts Radboud University
Ad A. Vermulst
Ad A. Vermulst Radboud University
Maykel Verkuyten
Maykel Verkuyten Utrecht University
Peter Sleegers
Peter Sleegers University of Twente
Paul M. Sniderman
Paul M. Sniderman Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA can lead to diverse careers in education, counseling, research, and more. Many students and working adults are now choosing flexible online programs for professional growth and academic advancement. Options like a master degree online allow you to earn credentials in just one year—ideal for those balancing work and study.

For adults seeking a faster route to a bachelor’s, accelerated bachelor's degree programs for adults make it possible to complete your degree sooner and transition into your desired field. Affordability is also a key concern for many students. People interested in social work should consider cheap online msw programs, which offer a lower-cost path to meaningful careers focused on helping individuals and communities.

If applied behavioral analysis interests you, bcba certification programs online provide convenient training for in-demand roles—often at a fraction of the price of traditional routes. By selecting the right online pathway, you can build the flexible skills needed to thrive in social sciences and humanities careers.

Best Scientists Citing Peer Scheepers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles