World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
56
Citations
15379
World Ranking
1868
National Ranking
55

Eldad Davidov publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eldad Davidov sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 161 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Eldad Davidov D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eldad Davidov sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eldad Davidov is affiliated with the University of Cologne in Germany and has contributed extensively to the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology. Their research spans 41 publications in Social Sciences and 28 in Psychology, with a focus on several subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Health, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

Their work covers key topics such as:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Racial and Ethnic Identity Research

Davidov's recent papers reflect a focus on measurement invariance, voting behavior, vaccination intentions, and Bayesian statistical methodologies. Notable publications include:

  • Measurement invariance in the social sciences: Historical development, methodological challenges, state of the art, and future perspectives (2022), published in Social Science Research
  • Correlates of COVID-19 vaccination intentions: Attitudes, institutional trust, fear, conspiracy beliefs, and vaccine skepticism (2022), published in Social Science & Medicine
  • Why Measurement Invariance is Important in Comparative Research. A Response to Welzel et al. (2021) (2022), published in Sociological Methods & Research
  • Explaining voting in the UK's 2016 EU referendum: Values, attitudes to immigration, European identity and political trust (2020), published in Social Science Research
  • Choosing Priors in Bayesian Measurement Invariance Modeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study (2020), published in Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Davidov include:

  • Daniel Seddig
  • Peter Schmidt
  • Jan Cieciuch
  • Dina Maskileyson
  • René Algesheimer

Davidov has published multiple articles in several key journals. Prominent publication venues include:

  • Sociological Methods & Research
  • Social Science Research
  • Journal of Personality Assessment
  • Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies
  • Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences

Best Publications

  • Refining the theory of basic individual values.

    Shalom H. Schwartz;Jan Cieciuch;Michele Vecchione;Eldad Davidov

  • Bringing Values Back In The Adequacy of the European Social Survey to Measure Values in 20 Countries

    Eldad Davidov;Peter Schmidt;Shalom H. Schwartz

  • Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research

    Eldad Davidov;Bart Meuleman;Jan Cieciuch;Peter Schmidt;Peter Schmidt

  • Changing attitudes toward immigration in Europe, 2002–2007: A dynamic group conflict theory approach

    Bart Meuleman;Eldad Davidov;Jaak Billiet

  • Basic personal values and the meaning of left‐right political orientations in 20 countries.

    Yuval Piurko;Shalom H. Schwartz;Eldad Davidov

  • Values and Support for Immigration : A Cross-Country Comparison

    Eldad Davidov;Eldad Davidov;Bart Meuleman;Jaak Billiet;Peter Schmidt

  • The Syndrome of Group-Focused Enmity: The Interrelation of Prejudices Tested with Multiple Cross-Sectional and Panel Data

    Andreas Zick;Carina Wolf;Beate Küpper;Eldad Davidov

  • An SEM Approach to Continuous Time Modeling of Panel Data: Relating Authoritarianism and Anomia

    Manuel C. Voelkle;Johan H. L. Oud;Eldad Davidov;Peter Schmidt

  • Measurement Equivalence of Nationalism and Constructive Patriotism in the ISSP: 34 Countries in a Comparative Perspective

    Eldad Davidov

  • A cross-country and cross-time comparison of the human values measurements with the second round of the European Social Survey

    Eldad Davidov

  • Contextual Sources of Perceived Group Threat: Negative Immigration-Related News Reports, Immigrant Group Size and their Interaction, Spain 1996–2007

    Elmar Schlueter;Eldad Davidov

  • Immigrant Integration policies and perceived Group Threat: A Multilevel Study of 27 Western and Eastern European Countries.

    Elmar Schlueter;Bart Meuleman;Eldad Davidov

  • Die Messung von Werten mit dem "Portraits Value Questionnaire"

    Peter Schmidt;Sebastian Bamberg;Eldad Davidov;Johannes Herrmann

  • Explaining Attitudes Towards Immigration Policies in European Countries: The Role of Human Values

    Eldad Davidov;Bart Meuleman

  • Measurement invariance in the social sciences: Historical development, methodological challenges, state of the art, and future perspectives.

    Unknown

  • Correlates of COVID-19 vaccination intentions: Attitudes, institutional trust, fear, conspiracy beliefs, and vaccine skepticism

    Unknown

  • Refining the theory of basic individual values

    Schwartz Shalom;J Cieciuch;M Vecchione;E Davidov

  • Using a Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Explain Cross-Cultural Measurement Noninvariance

    Eldad Davidov;Hermann Dülmer;Elmar Schlüter;Peter Schmidt

  • Can we Rate Public Support for Democracy in a Comparable Way? Cross-National Equivalence of Democratic Attitudes in the World Value Survey

    Gal Ariely;Eldad Davidov

  • Cross-cultural analysis : methods and applications

    Eldad Davidov;Peter Schmidt;Jaak Billiet

  • Testing the Stability of an Acquiescence Style Factor Behind Two Interrelated Substantive Variables in a Panel Design

    Jaak B. Billiet;Eldad Davidov

  • What does a nation owe non-citizens? National attachments, perception of threat and attitudes towards granting citizenship rights in a comparative perspective

    Rebeca Raijman;Eldad Davidov;Eldad Davidov;Peter Schmidt;Oshrat Hochman

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Cieciuch
Jan Cieciuch VIZJA University
Shalom H. Schwartz
Shalom H. Schwartz Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Moshe Semyonov
Moshe Semyonov Tel Aviv University
Sebastian Bamberg
Sebastian Bamberg Hochschule Bielefeld – University of Applied Sciences and Arts
Michele Vecchione
Michele Vecchione Sapienza University of Rome
Eva G. T. Green
Eva G. T. Green University of Lausanne
Gal Ariely
Gal Ariely Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Markku Verkasalo
Markku Verkasalo University of Helsinki
Ronald Fischer
Ronald Fischer Victoria University of Wellington
Anthony Heath
Anthony Heath University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA offers students flexibility and a range of online degree options to match diverse career goals. Many choose psychology masters programs for roles in counseling, education, or research. These programs can open pathways in both private and public sectors.

For those looking to advance in academic leadership or administration, edd degrees provide a fast-track route and can boost credentials for higher-level positions in education.

Time and budget-conscious learners may be interested in online master's degree options that can be completed within a year, offering both speed and quality without sacrificing educational standards.

If you're eager to jumpstart your career, accelerated bachelor degree programs enable students to graduate faster, making it possible to start working or move on to graduate studies sooner.

Whichever path you choose, online degrees in social sciences and humanities are designed to meet modern demands, offering both convenience and career versatility.

Best Scientists Citing Eldad Davidov

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles