World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
34
Citations
3975
World Ranking
7682
National Ranking
19

Qamar Qureshi publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Qamar Qureshi sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 181 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Qamar Qureshi D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Qamar Qureshi sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Qamar Qureshi is affiliated with the Wildlife Institute of India, situated in India. The core of their research lies within the field of Environmental Science, with an extensive focus on topics such as Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Bat Biology and Ecology Studies, Marine Animal Studies Overview, and Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology.

The scientist has contributed significantly to numerous peer-reviewed publications across various reputable venues. Prominent publication outlets include Scientific Reports, Oryx, Journal of Threatened Taxa, SSRN Electronic Journal, and Journal of Wildlife Science.

Among recent notable papers are:

  • Recovery of tigers in India: Critical introspection and potential lessons, 2021, People and Nature
  • Expanding niche and degrading forests: Key to the successful global invasion of Lantana camara (sensu lato), 2020, Global Ecology and Conservation
  • GPS-telemetry unveils the regular high-elevation crossing of the Himalayas by a migratory raptor: implications for definition of a "Central Asian Flyway", 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Role of species richness and human impacts in resisting invasive species in tropical forests, 2021, Journal of Ecology
  • Feasibility of reintroducing grassland megaherbivores, the greater one-horned rhinoceros, and swamp buffalo within their historic global range, 2021, Scientific Reports

Frequent collaboration has been a feature of their career, with coauthors including Yadvendradev V. Jhala, Vishnupriya Kolipakam, Lallianpuii Kawlni, Ninad Avinash Mungi, and Ujjwal Kumar. These partnerships have contributed to a substantial body of work in conservation and ecological research.

Qamar Qureshi's work spans several subfields of study, which include Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, and Genetics. This multidisciplinary approach supports diverse research questions related to conservation biology and species management.

Research topics covered emphasize complex ecological interactions and conservation challenges, reflecting ongoing contributions to understanding species recovery, invasive species management, habitat connectivity, and the feasibility of species reintroduction within natural landscapes.

Best Publications

  • Status of tigers, co-predators, and prey in India

    Y. V. Jhala;Rajesh Gopal;Q. Qureshi

  • Prioritizing tiger conservation through landscape genetics and habitat linkages.

    Bibek Yumnam;Yadvendradev V. Jhala;Qamar Qureshi;Jesus E. Maldonado

  • Evaluating capture–recapture population and density estimation of tigers in a population with known parameters

    R. K. Sharma;Y. Jhala;Q. Qureshi;J. Vattakaven

  • Density-dependent home-range size revealed by spatially explicit capture–recapture

    M.G. Efford;Deanna K. Dawson;Y.V. Jhala;Q. Qureshi

  • Spatio-temporal partitioning among large carnivores in relation to major prey species in Western Ghats

    T. Ramesh;R. Kalle;K. Sankar;Q. Qureshi

  • Recovery of tigers in India: Critical introspection and potential lessons

    Yadvendradev Jhala;Rajesh Gopal;Vaibhav Mathur;Prodipto Ghosh

  • Can the abundance of tigers be assessed from their signs

    Yadvendradev Jhala;Qamar Qureshi;Rajesh Gopal

  • Density of tiger and leopard in a tropical deciduous forest of Mudumalai Tiger Reserve, southern India, as estimated using photographic capture–recapture sampling

    Riddhika Kalle;Tharmalingam Ramesh;Qamar Qureshi;Kalyanasundaram Sankar

  • Effects of selective logging on vascular epiphyte diversity in a moist lowland forest of Eastern Himalaya, India

    R. Padmawathe;Q. Qureshi;G.S. Rawat

  • Predicting the distribution pattern of small carnivores in response to environmental factors in the Western Ghats.

    Riddhika Kalle;Tharmalingam Ramesh;Qamar Qureshi;Kalyanasundaram Sankar

  • Enclosure design and space utilization by Indian leopards (Panthera pardus) in four zoos in Southern India.

    Avanti Mallapur;Qamar Qureshi;Ravi Chellam

  • Adding constraints to predation through allometric relation of scats to consumption.

    Stotra Chakrabarti;Yadvendradev V. Jhala;Sutirtha Dutta;Qamar Qureshi

  • Monitoring of Reintroduced Tigers in Sariska Tiger Reserve, Western India: Preliminary Findings on Home Range, Prey Selection and Food Habits

    K. Sankar;Qamar Qureshi;Parag Nigam;P.K. Malik

  • Expanding niche and degrading forests: Key to the successful global invasion of Lantana camara (sensu lato)

    Ninad Avinash Mungi;Qamar Qureshi;Yadvendradev V. Jhala

  • GPS-telemetry unveils the regular high-elevation crossing of the Himalayas by a migratory raptor: implications for definition of a "Central Asian Flyway".

    Nishant Kumar;Urvi Gupta;Yadvendradev V. Jhala;Qamar Qureshi

  • Evaluating the status of the Endangered tiger Panthera tigris and its prey in Panna Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh, India.

    Rajesh Gopal;Qamar Qureshi;Manish Bhardwaj;R.K. Jagadish Singh

  • Food habits and prey selection of tiger and leopard in Mudumalai Tiger Reserve, Tamil Nadu, India

    Unknown

  • Dietary partitioning in sympatric large carnivores in a tropical forest of Western Ghats, India

    Tharmalingam Ramesh;Riddhika Kalle;Kalyanasundaram Sankar;Qamar Qureshi

  • Role of species richness and human impacts in resisting invasive species in tropical forests

    Ninad Avinash Mungi;Qamar Qureshi;Yadvendradev V. Jhala

  • Food habits and temporal activity patterns of the Golden Jackal Canis aureus and the Jungle Cat Felis chaos in Pench Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh

    Aniruddha Majumder;K. Sankar;Qamar Qureshi;Santanu Basu

  • Importance of forest structure versus floristics to composition of avian assemblages in tropical deciduous forests of Central Highlands, India

    Rajah Jayapal;Qamar Qureshi;Ravi Chellam

  • Economics of wildlife tourism - contribution to livelihoods of communities around Kanha tiger reserve, India.

    Bitapi C. Sinha;Qamar Qureshi;V. K. Uniyal;S. Sen

  • Use of camera traps to determine dispersal of tigers in semi-arid landscape, western India

    Randeep Singh;Qamar Qureshi;Kalyanasundaram Sankar;Paul R. Krausman

  • Plant diversity in sacred forest fragments of Western Ghats: a comparative study of four life forms

    Navendu V. Page;Qamar Qureshi;Gopal S. Rawat;Cheppudira G. Kushalappa

  • Habitat selection by an avian top predator in the tropical megacity of Delhi: human activities and socio-religious practices as prey-facilitating tools

    Nishant Kumar;Nishant Kumar;Urvi Gupta;Urvi Gupta;Yadvendradev V. Jhala;Qamar Qureshi

Frequent Co-Authors

Yadvendradev V. Jhala
Yadvendradev V. Jhala Wildlife Institute of India
Fabrizio Sergio
Fabrizio Sergio Spanish National Research Council
Paul R. Krausman
Paul R. Krausman University of Arizona
Jesús E. Maldonado
Jesús E. Maldonado Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute
Robert C. Fleischer
Robert C. Fleischer Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute
Colleen T. Downs
Colleen T. Downs University of KwaZulu-Natal
Ruth S. DeFries
Ruth S. DeFries Columbia University
Stephen T. Buckland
Stephen T. Buckland University of St Andrews
Vincent Nijman
Vincent Nijman Oxford Brookes University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to a wide range of rewarding online degrees and career paths related to health, science, and communication. If you’re interested in combining biology with helping others, consider asha accredited online slp programs. These programs train you to support people with speech and language disorders, blending science and care.

For those with a bachelor’s degree in another field, there are alternative routes, such as an slp bridge program online. This can transition your background in ecology or evolution to speech-language pathology, broadening your impact.

Healthcare careers are also accessible for non-nurses. Programs like online accelerated bsn programs for non nurses allow you to quickly enter the nursing profession, utilizing your scientific training in a clinical environment.

Looking toward advanced roles, careers as a psychiatric nurse practitioner offer both autonomy and strong earning potential. You can learn more about this path, including state-by-state salaries, from the resource: how much does a psychiatric nurse practitioner make.

Best Scientists Citing Qamar Qureshi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles