World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
7635
World Ranking
10094
National Ranking
4258

Dani Byrd publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dani Byrd sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 133 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Dani Byrd D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dani Byrd sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dani Byrd is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, notably Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Language and Linguistics, and Linguistics and Language. They contribute to interdisciplinary areas combining aspects of psychology, language studies, and imaging technologies.

Their work covers a range of topics including:

  • Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Linguistic Variation and Morphology
  • Speech and Audio Processing
  • Speech and Dialogue Systems
  • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Dani Byrd has published in a variety of academic venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Default Digital Object Group
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
  • Annual Review of Linguistics

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Cracking Prosody in Articulatory Phonology" (2021), published in Annual Review of Linguistics
  • "Improved 3D real-time MRI of speech production" (2021), published in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
  • "Co-Speech Movement in Conversational Turn-Taking" (2021), published in Frontiers in Communication
  • "The role of speech planning in the articulation of pauses" (2022), published in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • "Aliasing artifact reduction in spiral real-time MRI" (2021), published in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Dani Byrd include:

  • Louis Goldstein
  • Shrikanth Narayanan
  • Asterios Toutios
  • Melissa Xu

Best Publications

  • The elastic phrase: modeling the dynamics of boundary-adjacent lengthening

    Dani Byrd;Elliot Saltzman;Elliot Saltzman

  • Influences on articulatory timing in consonant sequences

    Dani Byrd

  • Relations of sex and dialect to reduction

    Dani Byrd

  • An approach to real-time magnetic resonance imaging for speech production.

    Shrikanth Narayanan;Krishna Nayak;Sungbok Lee;Abhinav Sethy

  • The role of vocal tract gestural action units in understanding the evolution of phonology

    Louis Goldstein;Dani Byrd;Elliot Saltzman

  • Dynamic action units slip in speech production errors.

    Louis Goldstein;Marianne Pouplier;Marianne Pouplier;Larissa Chen;Larissa Chen;Elliot Saltzman;Elliot Saltzman

  • Intragestural dynamics of multiple prosodic boundaries

    Dani Byrd;Elliot Saltzman

  • Auditory selective attention: an fMRI investigation.

    Kenneth R. Pugh;Kenneth R. Pugh;Bennett A. Shaywitz;Sally E. Shaywitz;Robert K. Fulbright

  • Articulatory vowel lengthening and coordination at phrasal junctures.

    Dani Byrd

  • How far, how long: On the temporal scope of prosodic boundary effects

    Dani Byrd;Jelena Krivokapić;Sungbok Lee

  • Gestural overlap and recoverability: Articulatory evidence from Georgian

    Ioana Chitoran;Louis Goldstein;Dani Byrd

  • Real-time magnetic resonance imaging and electromagnetic articulography database for speech production research (TC)

    Shrikanth Narayanan;Asterios Toutios;Vikram Ramanarayanan;Adam Lammert

  • Task-dynamics of gestural timing: Phase windows and multifrequency rhythms

    Elliot Saltzman;Elliot Saltzman;Dani Byrd;Dani Byrd

  • Saying consonant clusters quickly

    Dani Byrd;Cheng Cheng Tan

  • A Phase Window Framework for Articulatory Timing

    Dani Byrd

  • An articulatory view of Kinyarwanda coronal harmony

    Rachel Walker;Dani Byrd;Fidèle Mpiranya

  • Articulatory timing in English consonant sequences

    Dani Margaret Byrd

  • Seeing speech: Capturing vocal tract shaping using real-time magnetic resonance imaging [Exploratory DSP]

    E. Bresch;Yoon-Chul Kim;K. Nayak;D. Byrd

  • Preliminary results on speaker-dependent variation in the TIMIT database.

    Dani Byrd

  • TADA: An enhanced, portable Task Dynamics model in MATLAB

    Hosung Nam;Louis Goldstein;Elliot Saltzman;Dani Byrd

  • Timing effects of syllable structure and stress on nasals: a real-time MRI examination.

    Dani Byrd;Stephen J. Tobin;Erik Bresch;Shrikanth S. Narayanan

Frequent Co-Authors

Shrikanth S. Narayanan
Shrikanth S. Narayanan University of Southern California
Louis Goldstein
Louis Goldstein University of Southern California
Sungbok Lee
Sungbok Lee University of Southern California
Krishna S. Nayak
Krishna S. Nayak University of Southern California
Elliot Saltzman
Elliot Saltzman Boston University
Kenneth R. Pugh
Kenneth R. Pugh Haskins Laboratories
Donald Shankweiler
Donald Shankweiler University of Connecticut
Leonard Katz
Leonard Katz Haskins Laboratories
Sally E. Shaywitz
Sally E. Shaywitz Yale University
Jack M. Fletcher
Jack M. Fletcher University of Houston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science studies in the USA opens many options beyond traditional four-year degrees. For those who want quicker entry into the tech workforce, consider 2 year online degrees. These programs offer foundational knowledge and essential skills for roles such as support specialist or web developer.

If you're looking to boost your career prospects without investing several years, you might be interested in the shortest masters degree programs online. These accelerated pathways allow professionals to gain advanced expertise and credentials in as little as one year.

For those prioritizing career advancement and higher salaries, exploring the most valuable masters degrees can help identify programs with strong demand and return on investment.

It’s also worth considering easy licenses and certifications to get. These shorter courses or certifications provide specialized credentials, helping you gain recognition and qualify for technology-focused roles sooner.

Best Scientists Citing Dani Byrd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles