World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel Reisberg

Daniel Reisberg

Daniel Reisberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Reisberg sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel Reisberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Reisberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Daniel Reisberg is affiliated with Reed College in the United States and has contributed to research primarily in the areas of neuroscience and psychology. Their work focuses extensively on cognitive neuroscience, with related studies in social psychology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, computer vision and pattern recognition, and sociology and political science.

The main topics covered in Daniel Reisberg's research include memory processes and influences, face recognition and perception, deception detection and forensic psychology, radiology practices and education, social and intergroup psychology, and evolutionary psychology and human behavior.

Reisberg has collaborated frequently with a number of coauthors, notably Kathy Pezdek, with whom they have six joint publications. Other collaborators include Erica Abed, Jillian M. Kenchel, Rachel Leigh Greenspan, and Chad S. Dodson.

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on eyewitness memory, confidence, and identification processes in legal and applied settings. Notable publications include:

  • "Marijuana impairs the accuracy of eyewitness memory and the confidence-accuracy relationship too." (2020) in Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
  • "Psychological myths about evidence in the legal system: How should researchers respond?" (2022) in Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
  • "'In your own words, how certain are you?' Post-identification feedback distorts verbal and numeric expressions of eyewitness confidence" (2021) in Applied Cognitive Psychology
  • "Is the appearance change instruction ever helpful for eyewitness identifications?" (2025) in Psychology Crime and Law
  • "Police officers have no advantage over civilians when making identifications" (2023) in Applied Cognitive Psychology

The primary publication venues where Reisberg's work appears are the Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Applied Cognitive Psychology, Psychology Crime and Law, and Memory.

They have been recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) since 1994.

Best Publications

  • Remembering emotional events.

    Alafair Burke;Friderike Heuer;Daniel Reisberg

  • Vivid memories of emotional events: the accuracy of remembered minutiae.

    Friderike Heuer;Daniel Reisberg

  • Cognition: Exploring the Science of the Mind

    Daniel Reisberg

  • Intuitions and introspections about imagery: the role of imagery experience in shaping an investigator's theoretical views

    Daniel Reisberg;David G. Pearson;Stephen M. Kosslyn

  • Easy to hear but hard to understand: A lip-reading advantage with intact auditory stimuli.

    Daniel Reisberg;John McLean;Anne Goldfield

  • Memory and emotion.

    Daniel Reisberg;Paula Hertel

  • Can mental images be ambiguous

    Deborah Chambers;Daniel Reisberg

  • Memory for Emotional Events.

    Daniel Reisberg;Friderike Heuer

  • The role of subvocalization in auditory imagery.

    J. David Smith;Margaret Wilson;Daniel Reisberg

  • The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology

    Daniel Reisberg

  • Memory for thematically arousing events.

    Cara Laney;Hannah V. Campbell;Friderike Heuer;Daniel Reisberg

  • What an image depicts depends on what an image means.

    Deborah Chambers;Daniel Reisberg

  • Emotion, arousal, and memory for detail.

    Friderike Heuer;Daniel Reisberg

  • Limits of working memory: The digit digit-span.

    Daniel Reisberg;Ira Rappaport;Mark O'Shaughnessy

  • Learning and memory

    Barry Schwartz;Daniel Reisberg

  • The quantity, not the quality, of affect predicts memory vividness

    Daniel Reisberg;Friderike Heuer;John Mclean;Mark O’shaughnessy

  • Affect and accuracy in recall: Remembering the details of emotional events

    Daniel Reisberg;Friderike Heuer

  • "Enacted" auditory images are ambiguous; "pure" auditory images are not.

    Daniel Reisberg;J. David Smith;David A. Baxter;Marcia Sonenshine

  • Overcoming Stroop interference: the effects of practice on distractor potency

    Daniel Reisberg;Jonathan Baron;Deborah G. Kemler

  • On the Perception of Interleaved Melodies

    Erick Gallun;Daniel Reisberg

Frequent Co-Authors

J. David Smith
J. David Smith Georgia State University
Kathy Pezdek
Kathy Pezdek Claremont Graduate University
Stephen M. Kosslyn
Stephen M. Kosslyn Harvard University
Daniel J. Simons
Daniel J. Simons University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jonathan Baron
Jonathan Baron University of Pennsylvania
Cesare Cornoldi
Cesare Cornoldi University of Padua
Robert H. Logie
Robert H. Logie University of Edinburgh
Marlene Behrmann
Marlene Behrmann Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a variety of rewarding careers—many of which can be started or advanced online. One popular pathway is social work, a field that requires specialized education and credentials depending on your state of residence.

Each state has unique requirements for becoming a licensed social worker. For example, if you’re interested in working in Colorado, it’s important to understand the requirements to be a social worker in Colorado. Likewise, those considering work in Connecticut should review the Connecticut social work education requirements.

Exploring regional nuances is essential because licensing processes and educational expectations vary. Learn more about how to become a social worker in Delaware or discover the necessary steps for how to become a social worker in Florida to ensure you meet local standards.

Before enrolling in an online program, research your state’s regulations. Understanding these rules will help you select the right accredited degree, set realistic career goals, and maximize your employment prospects after graduation.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Reisberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles