World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 84 1216 1070 146 134 343 29447

Robert H. Logie publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert H. Logie between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert H. Logie published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 8.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2011. 12 of the 378 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2011. 1980: 2 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 3 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 9 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 14 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 7 publications
1980 2025

378 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert H. Logie: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 2
1981 3
1982 1
1983 2
1984 1
1985 3
1986 4
1987 3
1988 9
1989 5
1990 7
1991 9
1992 6
1993 14
1994 2
1995 3
1996 10
1997 5
1998 10
1999 13
2000 8
2001 8
2002 15
2003 15
2004 8
2005 5
2006 8
2007 13
2008 13
2009 18
2010 19
2011 21
2012 5
2013 10
2014 12
2015 13
2016 9
2017 7
2018 8
2019 9
2020 9
2021 5
2022 7
2023 9
2024 5
2025 7
Total 378
Download as CSV

Robert H. Logie publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert H. Logie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–350 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 343 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85 343
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert H. Logie D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert H. Logie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86 84
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh

Overview

Robert H. Logie is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology, focusing extensively on Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Additional subfields include Artificial Intelligence, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Recent publications by Robert H. Logie demonstrate a range of interests within cognitive and memory research. Notable recent papers include:

  • "How Do Scientific Views Change? Notes From an Extended Adversarial Collaboration," 2020, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Strategy mediation in working memory training in younger and older adults," 2020, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • "Forgetting in Alzheimer's disease: Is it fast? Is it affected by repeated retrieval?," 2020, Neuropsychologia
  • "Cognitive aging and verbal labeling in continuous visual memory," 2020, Memory & Cognition
  • "Rate of forgetting is independent of initial degree of learning," 2022, Memory & Cognition

Robert H. Logie has collaborated frequently with several scholars across their disciplines. Key frequent co-authors include:

  • Sergio Della Sala (9 collaborations)
  • Valérie Camos (7 collaborations)
  • Alan Baddeley (7 collaborations)
  • Nelson Cowan (6 collaborations)
  • Clément Belletier (6 collaborations)

The scientist's works are often published in venues recognized in cognitive and psychological research, such as:

  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (8 publications)
  • Memory & Cognition (6 publications)
  • Neuropsychologia (2 publications)
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (2 publications)
  • Cortex (2 publications)

Throughout their career, Robert H. Logie has been recognized with the award Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 2003.

Best Publications

  • Working Memory: The multiple-component model

    Alan D. Baddeley;Robert H. Logie

  • Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words

    K. J. Gilhooly;R. H. Logie

  • Dementia and Working Memory

    Alan D. Baddeley;R. Logie;S Bressi;S. Della Sala

  • The decline of working memory in Alzheimer's disease : A longitudinal study

    A. D. Baddeley;S. Bressi;S. Della Sala;R. Logie

  • Visuo-spatial Working Memory

    Unknown

  • Prospective and retrospective memory in normal ageing and dementia: A questionnaire study

    Geoff Smith;Sergiola Del Sala;Robert H. Logie;Elizabeth A. Maylor

  • Counting on working memory in arithmetic problem solving.

    Robert H. Logie;Kenneth J. Gilhooly;Valerie Wynn

  • Components of fluent reading

    Alan Baddeley;Robert Logie;Ian Nimmo-Smith;Neil Brereton

  • THE FORMATION OF FLASHBULB MEMORIES

    Martin A. Conway;Stephen J Anderson;Steen F Larsen;C. M. Donnelly

  • Visuo-spatial processing in working memory

    Robert H. Logie

  • Interference with visual short-term memory

    Robert H. Logie;Gesualdo M. Zucco;Alan D. Baddeley

  • The Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ): Normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample.

    John R Crawford;Geoff Smith;Elizabeth A Maylor;Sergio Della Sala

  • The Inner Eye and the Inner Scribe of Visuo-spatial Working Memory: Evidence from Developmental Fractionation

    Robert H. Logie;David G. Pearson

  • The Functional Organization and Capacity Limits of Working Memory

    Robert H. Logie

  • Concurrent performance of two memory tasks: evidence for domain-specific working memory systems.

    Gianna Cocchini;Robert H. Logie;Sergio Della Sala;Sarah E. MacPherson

  • Visuo-spatial working memory: Visual, spatial, or central executive?

    Robert H. Logie;Clelia Marchetti

  • Cognitive processes in counting.

    Robert H. Logie;Alan D. Baddeley

  • Working memory and strategies in syllogistic-reasoning tasks

    K. J. Gilhooly;R. H. Logie;N. E. Wetherick;V. Wynn

  • Visual short-term memory binding deficits in familial Alzheimer's disease

    Mario A. Parra;Mario A. Parra;Sharon Abrahams;Robert H. Logie;Luis G. Méndez

  • Mental images in human cognition

    Robert H. Logie;Michel Denis

  • Is There a Specific Executive Capacity for Dual Task Coordination? Evidence From Alzheimer's Disease

    Robert H. Logie;Gianna Cocchini;Sergio Delia Sala;Alan D. Baddeley

Frequent Co-Authors

Sergio Della Sala
Sergio Della Sala University of Edinburgh
Alan D. Baddeley
Alan D. Baddeley University of York
Kenneth Gilhooly
Kenneth Gilhooly Brunel University London
Nelson Cowan
Nelson Cowan University of Missouri
Mario A. Parra
Mario A. Parra University of Strathclyde
Sarah E. MacPherson
Sarah E. MacPherson University of Edinburgh
Valérie Camos
Valérie Camos University of Fribourg
Sharon Abrahams
Sharon Abrahams University of Edinburgh
Moshe Naveh-Benjamin
Moshe Naveh-Benjamin University of Missouri
Elizabeth A. Maylor
Elizabeth A. Maylor University of Warwick

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens up diverse online learning and career opportunities. Many students choose online degrees in psychology, counseling, or social work to prepare for specialized careers such as marriage and family therapy. Online programs offer flexibility, making it easier for working adults or those with family obligations to pursue higher education.

Each state has unique requirements for licensure as a therapist. For example, students interested in learning how to become an mft in Plano or how to become an mft in Port St. Lucie must follow specific educational and clinical hour criteria. Similarly, areas like how to become a marriage and family therapist in Portland and how to become a marriage and family therapist in Raleigh have their own rules and pathways to licensure.

Exploring these different career pathways ensures you meet your state’s requirements and find the online program best suited to your needs. Whether you aim to work in therapy, counseling, or research, online degrees can be a valuable step toward a rewarding career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Robert H. Logie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles