World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8135 7594 801 765 153 8566

Kenneth Gilhooly publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kenneth Gilhooly between 1974 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kenneth Gilhooly published across 52 years, from 1974 to 2025, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2017. 1 of the 175 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2017. 1974: 2 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 5 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 12 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1974 2025

175 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kenneth Gilhooly: publications per year, 1974 to 2025
Year Publications
1974 2
1975 1
1976 0
1977 1
1978 1
1979 1
1980 3
1981 3
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 1
1987 1
1988 2
1989 6
1990 5
1991 5
1992 3
1993 4
1994 2
1995 1
1996 1
1997 2
1998 1
1999 5
2000 1
2001 1
2002 4
2003 9
2004 3
2005 2
2006 2
2007 7
2008 0
2009 6
2010 5
2011 10
2012 7
2013 4
2014 6
2015 5
2016 7
2017 12
2018 6
2019 11
2020 1
2021 12
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 175
Download as CSV

Kenneth Gilhooly publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth Gilhooly sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 153 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 153
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kenneth Gilhooly D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth Gilhooly sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kenneth Gilhooly is affiliated with Brunel University London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields within the social sciences, with a particular focus on psychology. The main fields of study associated with their work include Psychology and Social Sciences, supported by research in subfields such as Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Health, Demography, Sociology and Political Science, and Artificial Intelligence.

The scientist's research topics cover a diverse range of areas including:

  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
  • Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Cognitive Science and Mapping
  • Mind wandering and attention
  • Team Dynamics and Performance

Recent publications illustrate the scope and themes of their research:

  • Loneliness in mid-life and older adults from ethnic minority communities in England and Wales: measure validation and prevalence estimates, 2020, European Journal of Ageing
  • Cyber-Creativity: A Decalogue of Research Challenges, 2025, Journal of Intelligence

Frequent collaborators in Kenneth Gilhooly's research include Mary Gilhooly, with whom they have coauthored ten papers. Other coauthors with whom they have worked on at least one publication each are Christina Victor, Christine Dobbs, Vanessa Burholt, and Giovanni Emanuele Corazza.

The venues where the scientist frequently publishes reflect their interdisciplinary interests. These include the European Journal of Ageing and the Journal of Intelligence, both contributing to the dissemination of their work in aging studies and cognitive or creative intelligence research, respectively.

Best Publications

  • Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words

    K. J. Gilhooly;R. H. Logie

  • Divergent thinking: Strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects

    Ken Gilhooly;Evie Fioratou;S.H. Anthony;V. Wynn

  • Counting on working memory in arithmetic problem solving.

    Robert H. Logie;Kenneth J. Gilhooly;Valerie Wynn

  • A meta-review of stress, coping and interventions in dementia and dementia caregiving

    K. J. Gilhooly;M. L. M. Gilhooly;M. P. Sullivan;A. McIntyre

  • Working memory and strategies in syllogistic-reasoning tasks

    K. J. Gilhooly;R. H. Logie;N. E. Wetherick;V. Wynn

  • The role of memory in the Tower of London task.

    Louise H. Phillips;V. Wynn;K. J. Gilhooly;S. Della Sala

  • Age-of-acquisition effects in lexical and episodic memory tasks

    K. J. Gilhooly;M. L. Gilhooly

  • Differentiating insight from non-insight problems

    K. J. Gilhooly;P. Murphy

  • Mental planning and the Tower of London task.

    L. H. Phillips;V. E. Wynn;S. McPherson;K. J. Gilhooly

  • Skill in Map Reading and Memory for Maps

    Kenneth J. Gilhooly;Michael Wood;Paul R. Kinnear;Caroline Green

  • Verbal Representations and Spatial Manipulation During Mental Synthesis

    David G. Pearson;Robert H. Logie;Ken J. Gilhooly

  • Executive functions in insight versus non-insight problem solving: An individual differences approach

    KJ Gilhooly;E Fioratou

  • The validity of age-of-acquisition ratings

    K. J. Gilhooly;M. L. M. Gilhooly

  • The effects of adult aging and induced positive and negative mood on planning

    Louise H. Phillips;Liz Smith;Ken J. Gilhooly

  • More about linda or conjunctions in context

    Ranald R. Macdonald;Kenneth J. Gilhooly

  • Incubation and Creativity : Do Something Different

    Kenneth Gilhooly;George Georgiou;Ultan Devery

  • Planning Processes and Age in the Five-disc Tower of London Task

    K. J. Gilhooly;L. H. Phillips;V. Wynn;R. H. Logie

  • Imagery, concreteness, age-of-acquisition, familiarity, and meaningfulness values for 205 five-letter words having single-solution anagrams

    K. J. Gilhooly;D. Hay

  • Visuo-spatial and verbal working memory in the five-disc Tower of London task: An individual differences approach

    K. J. Gilhooly;V. Wynn;Louise Helen Phillips;R. H. Logie

  • Word age-of-acquisition, reading latencies and auditory recognition

    K J Gilhooly;Robert Logie

  • Use of the physical environment to support everyday activities for people with dementia: A systematic review.

    R Woodbridge;MP Sullivan;E Harding;S Crutch

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert H. Logie
Robert H. Logie University of Edinburgh
Louise H. Phillips
Louise H. Phillips University of Aberdeen
Sebastian J. Crutch
Sebastian J. Crutch University College London
Christina R. Victor
Christina R. Victor Brunel University London
Michael Levi
Michael Levi Cardiff University
Vanessa Burholt
Vanessa Burholt Swansea University
Fernand Gobet
Fernand Gobet London School of Economics and Political Science
Linden J. Ball
Linden J. Ball University of Central Lancashire
Sharon Anne Simpson
Sharon Anne Simpson University of Glasgow
Vikki Entwistle
Vikki Entwistle University of Aberdeen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens up a variety of online learning options and rewarding career paths, especially in mental health. While a bachelor’s in psychology is a great starting point, most clinical roles—such as becoming a mental health counselor—require a master’s degree plus state-specific certifications.

Requirements can differ across locations. For instance, mental health counselor requirements in Fresno include earning a graduate degree, supervised work experience, and passing a national exam. If you are interested in the mental health counselor requirements in Garland, you’ll find similar expectations along with a focus on state licensure and continuing education.

In other regions like Gilbert, obtaining your Gilbert mental health counselor certification requirements means completing accredited coursework, clinical practice, and often, background checks. Likewise, the mental health counselor requirements in Glendale highlight the importance of accredited education and meeting all local regulations for practice.

Online psychology degrees can provide flexibility and accessibility for students nationwide, but it’s vital to verify the program’s accreditation and understand your chosen state’s licensure requirements before beginning your studies.

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth Gilhooly

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles