World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
72
Citations
18413
World Ranking
2072
National Ranking
232

Louise H. Phillips publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louise H. Phillips sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 223 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Louise H. Phillips D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louise H. Phillips sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Louise H. Phillips is affiliated with the University of Aberdeen in the United Kingdom. Their research spans interdisciplinary fields primarily within psychology and neuroscience, focusing on understanding cognitive and neural processes related to perception, aging, and social behavior.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Within these areas, their work explores several subfields such as:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

The key research topics covered by Louise H. Phillips include:

  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms

The scientist has contributed papers to several publication venues with multiple works featured in:

  • Emotion
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • Applied Cognitive Psychology

Other venues with notable publications include Psychological Bulletin and Psychology and Aging.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Louise H. Phillips include:

  • Visual attentional orienting by eye gaze: A meta-analytic review of the gaze-cueing effect. (2021), Psychological Bulletin
  • Task characteristics influence facial emotion recognition age-effects: A meta-analytic review. (2020), Psychology and Aging
  • Is Individualism Suicidogenic? Findings From a Multinational Study of Young Adults From 12 Countries (2020), Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Multiple sclerosis, emotion perception and social functioning (2021), Journal of Neuropsychology
  • Imprinting methylation predicts hippocampal volumes and hyperintensities and the change with age in later life (2021), Scientific Reports

Throughout their career, Phillips has frequently collaborated with a group of researchers, including Louisa Lawrie, Sarah A. Grainger, Julie D. Henry, Min Hooi Yong, and Gillian Slessor.

Best Publications

  • A meta-analytic review of emotion recognition and aging: Implications for neuropsychological models of aging

    Ted Ruffman;Julie D. Henry;Vicki Livingstone;Louise H. Phillips

  • Verbal fluency performance in dementia of the Alzheimer's type: a meta-analysis.

    Julie D Henry;John R Crawford;Louise H Phillips

  • Age, executive function and social decision making: A dorsolateral prefrontal theory of cognitive aging.

    Sarah E. MacPherson;Louise H. Phillips;Sergio Della Sala

  • A meta-analytic review of prospective memory and aging.

    Julie D. Henry;Mairi S. MacLeod;Louise H. Phillips;John R. Crawford

  • Shifting moods, wandering minds: negative moods lead the mind to wander.

    Jonathan Smallwood;Annamay Fitzgerald;Lynden K. Miles;Louise H. Phillips

  • The psychological, neurochemical and functional neuroanatomical mediators of the effects of positive and negative mood on executive functions

    Rachel L. C. Mitchell;Louise Helen Phillips

  • Positive mood and executive function: evidence from stroop and fluency tasks.

    Louise H. Phillips;Rebecca Bull;Ewan Adams;Lisa Fraser

  • A meta-analytic review of age differences in theory of mind

    Julie D. Henry;Louise H. Phillips;Ted Ruffman;Phoebe E. Bailey

  • Age and the understanding of emotions: neuropsychological and sociocognitive perspectives

    Louise H. Phillips;Rory D. J. MacLean;Roy Allen

  • Inhibitory functioning in Alzheimer's disease.

    Hélène Amieva;Louise H Phillips;Sergio Della Sala;Julie D Henry

  • Age, anger regulation and well-being

    Louise Helen Phillips;Julie Diane Henry;Judith Ann Hosie;Alan Berkeley Milne

  • Theory of mind following traumatic brain injury: The role of emotion recognition and executive dysfunction

    Julie Diane Henry;Louise Helen Phillips;John Robertson Crawford;Magdalena Ietswaart

  • The role of control functions in mentalizing: dual-task studies of theory of mind and executive function.

    Rebecca Bull;Louise H. Phillips;Claire A. Conway

  • Self-regulation and risk-taking

    Emily C.E. Magar;Louise H. Phillips;Judith A. Hosie

  • Adult age differences in event-based prospective memory: a meta-analysis on the role of focal versus nonfocal cues.

    Matthias Kliegel;Theodor Jäger;Louise H. Phillips

  • The role of memory in the Tower of London task.

    Louise H. Phillips;V. Wynn;K. J. Gilhooly;S. Della Sala

  • Differential effects of aging on executive and automatic inhibition.

    Pilar Andrés;Chiara Guerrini;Louise H. Phillips;Timothy J. Perfect

  • The overlapping relationship between emotion perception and theory of mind.

    Rachel L.C. Mitchell;Louise H. Phillips

  • Effective Regulation of the Experience and Expression of Negative Affect in Old Age

    Louise H. Phillips;Julie D. Henry;Judith A. Hosie;Alan B. Milne

  • Exploring the Specificity of Age-Related Differences in Theory of Mind Tasks

    Gillian Slessor;Louise Helen Phillips;Rebecca Bull

Frequent Co-Authors

Julie D. Henry
Julie D. Henry University of Queensland
Matthias Kliegel
Matthias Kliegel University of Geneva
Sarah E. MacPherson
Sarah E. MacPherson University of Edinburgh
Sergio Della Sala
Sergio Della Sala University of Edinburgh
Peter G. Rendell
Peter G. Rendell University of Queensland
Rebecca Bull
Rebecca Bull Macquarie University
Mareike Altgassen
Mareike Altgassen Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Kenneth Gilhooly
Kenneth Gilhooly Brunel University London
John Robertson Crawford
John Robertson Crawford University of Aberdeen
Marie Johnston
Marie Johnston University of Aberdeen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology career in the United States offers a variety of educational options and professional pathways, especially with the rise of flexible online programs. Many students consider online degrees in counseling as an accessible and convenient way to gain relevant qualifications without relocating or disrupting their current commitments.

If you are interested in a targeted approach, you can review the easiest online counseling master's degrees in Pennsylvania or explore regional opportunities such as the easiest online counseling programs in Virginia. For a broader perspective, take a look at the America easiest counseling master degrees online list or discover more with the easiest counseling online programs in USA.

These resources showcase programs that balance academic rigor with practical application, helping students enter roles such as school counselors, mental health therapists, or case managers. Online study not only offers flexibility but can also accelerate your entry into a meaningful counseling or psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Louise H. Phillips

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles