World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
7706
World Ranking
5508
National Ranking
320

Peter G. Rendell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter G. Rendell sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 164 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Peter G. Rendell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter G. Rendell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter G. Rendell is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia and has contributed extensively to research in psychology and neuroscience. Their work spans several subfields including cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, psychiatry, and mental health, as well as cellular and molecular neuroscience.

Their research primarily focuses on cognitive functions and memory, dementia and cognitive impairment, functional brain connectivity studies, and neural and behavioral psychology. Additional interests include anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, age of information optimization, and the influence of neurotransmitter receptors on behavior.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Psychology and Aging
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Innovation in Aging
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology

Among recent papers, several notable contributions are:

  • Task characteristics influence facial emotion recognition age-effects: A meta-analytic review, 2020, Psychology and Aging
  • Sex differences in the neuroanatomy of alcohol dependence: hippocampus and amygdala subregions in a sample of 966 people from the ENIGMA Addiction Working Group, 2021, Translational Psychiatry
  • Differences in time-based task characteristics help to explain the age-prospective memory paradox, 2020, Cognition
  • Implementation intentions and prospective memory function in late adulthood, 2020, Psychology and Aging
  • Rapid facial mimicry responses are preserved in youth with first presentation borderline personality disorder, 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders

The scientist regularly collaborates with several coauthors including Gill Terrett, Julie D. Henry, Izelle Labuschagne, Valentina Lorenzetti, and Chao Suo. The number of joint publications indicates sustained collaborative research efforts particularly with Gill Terrett and Julie D. Henry.

Best Publications

  • Virtual week and actual week: Age‐related differences in prospective memory

    Peter Gregory Rendell;Fergus I. M. Craik

  • A review of the impact of pregnancy on memory function

    Julie D Henry;Peter G Rendell

  • Aging and prospective memory : Differences between naturalistic and laboratory tasks

    Peter Gregory Rendell;Donald M. Thomson

  • Empathy, social functioning and schizotypy.

    Julie D. Henry;Phoebe E. Bailey;Peter G. Rendell

  • Age and individual differences in prospective memory during a "Virtual Week": the roles of working memory, vigilance, task regularity, and cue focality.

    Nathan S. Rose;Peter G. Rendell;Mark A. McDaniel;Ingo Aberle

  • Prospective memory in schizophrenia: Primary or secondary impairment?

    Julie D. Henry;Peter G. Rendell;Matthias Kliegel;Mareike Altgassen

  • Emotion regulation in schizophrenia: affective, social, and clinical correlates of suppression and reappraisal.

    Julie D. Henry;Peter G. Rendell;Melissa J. Green;Skye McDonald

  • The age-prospective memory-paradox: an exploration of possible mechanisms

    Katharina M. Schnitzspahn;Andreas Ihle;Julie D. Henry;Peter G. Rendell

  • Evidence for deficits in facial affect recognition and theory of mind in multiple sclerosis.

    Julie Diane Henry;Louise Helen Phillips;William W. Beatty;Skye McDonald

  • Recognition of disgust is selectively preserved in Alzheimer's disease.

    Julie D. Henry;Ted Ruffman;Skye McDonald;Marie-Andree Peek O’Leary

  • The Age Prospective Memory Paradox: Young Adults May Not Give Their Best outside of the Lab

    Ingo Aberle;Peter G. Rendell;Nathan S. Rose;Mark A. McDaniel

  • A review of virtual week for prospective memory assessment: Clinical implications

    Peter Gregory Rendell;Julie Henry

  • Prospective memory impairment in former users of methamphetamine.

    Peter Gregory Rendell;Magdalena Mazur;Julie D. Henry

  • Task characteristics influence facial emotion recognition age-effects : A meta-analytic review

    Grace S. Hayes;Skye N. McLennan;Julie D. Henry;Louise H. Phillips

  • Emotion Experience, Expression, and Regulation in Alzheimer's Disease

    Julie D. Henry;Peter Gregory Rendell;Amanda Christine Scicluna;Michelle Louise Jackson

  • Cognitive and Neural Plasticity in Older Adults’ Prospective Memory Following Training with the Virtual Week Computer Game

    Nathan S. Rose;Peter G. Rendell;Alexandra Hering;Matthias Kliegel

  • Prospective memory function in mild cognitive impairment and early dementia.

    Claire Thompson;Julie D. Henry;Peter G. Rendell;Adrienne Withall

  • The puzzle of inconsistent age-related declines in prospective memory: A multiprocess explanation.

    Mark McDaniel;Gilles Einstein;Peter Gregory Rendell

  • Age-related effects in prospective memory are modulated by ongoing task complexity and relation to target cue.

    Peter G. Rendell;Mark A. McDaniel;Robert D. Forbes;Gilles O. Einstein

  • Prospective memory in multiple sclerosis.

    Peter G. Rendell;Fiona Jensen;Julie D. Henry

  • Future thinking improves prospective memory performance and plan enactment in older adults

    Mareike Altgassen;Peter G. Rendell;Anka Bernhard;Julie D. Henry

  • Drinking and future thinking: acute effects of alcohol on prospective memory and future simulation.

    Theadora Paraskevaides;Celia J. A. Morgan;Julie R. Leitz;Julie R. Leitz;James A. Bisby

Frequent Co-Authors

Julie D. Henry
Julie D. Henry University of Queensland
Matthias Kliegel
Matthias Kliegel University of Geneva
Louise H. Phillips
Louise H. Phillips University of Aberdeen
Mareike Altgassen
Mareike Altgassen Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
David R. Thompson
David R. Thompson Queen's University Belfast
Ted Ruffman
Ted Ruffman University of Otago
Henry Brodaty
Henry Brodaty University of New South Wales
Mark A. McDaniel
Mark A. McDaniel Washington University in St. Louis
Fergus I. M. Craik
Fergus I. M. Craik University of Toronto
H. Valerie Curran
H. Valerie Curran University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in psychology opens a range of career pathways, from clinical counseling to organizational psychology. Many students are concerned about not just the quality of programs, but also affordability. Cost-effective education pathways are increasingly important, especially when considering licensure and further specialization.

There are numerous accredited programs across the USA offering flexible and budget-friendly online counseling degrees. For example, students interested in studying in the Southwest can explore some of the cheapest counseling programs in Tempe. If you’re considering the South, check out affordable counseling programs in Texas. The West also offers accessible options, with the cheapest counseling programs in Utah available for aspiring counselors.

For those in the Midwest, affordable counseling programs in Wisconsin offer some of the best value. Exploring these affordable online degrees can help reduce student debt and provide access to fulfilling career options such as clinical counseling, school psychology, and community mental health. No matter your location, seeking affordable education is a smart first step in building a career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Peter G. Rendell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles