World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 95 781 683 488 414 401 29980

John DeLuca publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John DeLuca between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John DeLuca published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 11.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2020. 33 of the 492 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2020. 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 14 publications
1982 2025

492 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John DeLuca: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 2
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 3
1990 4
1991 4
1992 3
1993 5
1994 5
1995 9
1996 12
1997 13
1998 14
1999 9
2000 11
2001 12
2002 11
2003 8
2004 8
2005 9
2006 9
2007 13
2008 10
2009 19
2010 13
2011 13
2012 12
2013 19
2014 24
2015 18
2016 22
2017 13
2018 20
2019 19
2020 28
2021 19
2022 19
2023 27
2024 19
2025 14
Total 492
Download as CSV

John DeLuca publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John DeLuca sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–410 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 401 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43 401
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

John DeLuca D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John DeLuca sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78 95
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John DeLuca is affiliated with the Kessler Foundation in the United States, focusing on research primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields including Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, and Epidemiology.

Their research topics emphasize multiple sclerosis and related areas such as fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome, traumatic brain injury, functional brain connectivity, long-term effects of COVID-19, autoimmune and inflammatory disorders, and mechanisms of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration.

Among recent publications associated with or relevant to John DeLuca's research are these notable papers:

  • Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: clinical management, MRI, and therapeutic avenues (2020, The Lancet Neurology)
  • Treatment and management of cognitive dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis (2020, Nature Reviews Neurology)
  • Using functional connectivity changes associated with cognitive fatigue to delineate a fatigue network (2020, Scientific Reports)
  • The emotional impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals with progressive multiple sclerosis (2020, Journal of Neurology)
  • Neural mechanisms underlying state mental fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a pilot study (2020, Journal of Neurology)

Frequently collaborating authors with John DeLuca include Nancy D. Chiaravalloti, Brian M. Sandroff, Helen M. Genova, Gary Cutter, and Amber Salter. These collaborators have contributed to a broad range of studies related to neurological conditions and rehabilitation.

John DeLuca's research has been published extensively across various journals, with frequent publication venues including:

  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
  • Journal of Neurology
  • Neurology
  • Multiple Sclerosis Journal

Best Publications

  • Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis

    Nancy D Chiaravalloti;John DeLuca

  • Validity of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test as a cognition performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis.

    Ralph Hb Benedict;John DeLuca;Glenn Phillips;Nicholas LaRocca

  • Minimal neuropsychological assessment of MS patients: a consensus approach.

    Ralph H.B. Benedict;Ralph H.B. Benedict;Jill S. Fischer;Cate J. Archibald;Peter Andrew Arnett

  • Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: clinical management, MRI, and therapeutic avenues.

    Ralph H B Benedict;Maria Pia Amato;John DeLuca;Jeroen J G Geurts

  • Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

    Jeffrey S. Kreutzer;John DeLuca;Bruce Caplan

  • Is speed of processing or working memory the primary information processing deficit in multiple sclerosis

    John DeLuca;Gordon J. Chelune;David S. Tulsky;Jean Lengenfelder

  • The Goldman Consensus statement on depression in multiple sclerosis

    Randolph B. Schiffer;Peter Arnett;Aliza Ben-Zacharia;Ralph Benedict

  • Recommendations for cognitive screening and management in multiple sclerosis care

    Rosalind Kalb;Meghan Beier;Ralph H.B. Benedict;Leigh Charvet

  • The nature of memory impairments in multiple sclerosis: Acquisition versus retrieval

    John Deluca;Susan Barbieri-berger;Susan K. Johnson

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging of working memory impairment after traumatic brain injury

    Christodoulou C;DeLuca J;Ricker Jh;Madigan Nk

  • Speed of information processing as a key deficit in multiple sclerosis: implications for rehabilitation

    Heath A Demaree;John DeLuca;Elizabeth A Gaudino;Bruce J Diamond

  • Neural correlates of cognitive fatigue in multiple sclerosis using functional MRI.

    John DeLuca;Helen M. Genova;Frank G. Hillary;Glenn Wylie

  • A trial of neuropsychologic rehabilitation in mild-spectrum traumatic brain injury.

    Lana A. Tiersky;Lana A. Tiersky;Vera Anselmi;Mark V. Johnston;Jonathan Kurtyka

  • Evidenced-based cognitive rehabilitation for persons with multiple sclerosis: a review of the literature.

    Amanda R. O’Brien;Nancy Chiaravalloti;Yael Goverover;John DeLuca

  • Acquisition and storage deficits in multiple sclerosis.

    John DeLuca;Elizabeth A. Gaudino;Bruce J. Diamond;Christopher Christodoulou

  • Treatment of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: position paper

    Maria Pia Amato;Dawn Langdon;Xavier Montalban;Ralph H. B. Benedict

  • The dopamine imbalance hypothesis of fatigue in multiple sclerosis and other neurological disorders.

    Ekaterina Dobryakova;Ekaterina Dobryakova;Helen M. Genova;Helen M. Genova;John DeLuca;John DeLuca;Glenn R. Wylie;Glenn R. Wylie;Glenn R. Wylie

  • The contribution of MRI in assessing cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis.

    M. Filippi;M.A. Rocca;R.H.B. Benedict;J. DeLuca

  • A Controlled Comparison of Multiple Chemical Sensitivities and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

    Nancy Fiedler;Howard M. Kipen;John DeLuca;Kathie Kelly-McNeil

  • Brain reserve and cognitive reserve in multiple sclerosis What you’ve got and how you use it

    James F. Sumowski;Maria A. Rocca;Victoria M. Leavitt;Gianna Riccitelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Nancy D. Chiaravalloti
Nancy D. Chiaravalloti Kessler Foundation
Glenn R. Wylie
Glenn R. Wylie Kessler Foundation
Helen M. Genova
Helen M. Genova Kessler Foundation
Benjamin H. Natelson
Benjamin H. Natelson Mount Sinai Health System
Ralph H.B. Benedict
Ralph H.B. Benedict University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Robert W. Motl
Robert W. Motl University of Illinois at Chicago
Massimo Filippi
Massimo Filippi Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Maria A. Rocca
Maria A. Rocca Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Frank G. Hillary
Frank G. Hillary Pennsylvania State University
Giancarlo Comi
Giancarlo Comi Vita-Salute San Raffaele University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Psychology in the USA can open up a variety of flexible online degree programs and rewarding career paths. Many students pursue online bachelor’s or master’s degrees in psychology, which provide a strong foundation for specialized roles, such as mental health counseling or clinical social work.

A key concern for potential counselors is meeting education and licensing requirements, which can differ by state and city. For example, you can learn about Oakland mental health counselor education requirements and compare them to the Oklahoma City mental health counselor education requirements. Location impacts factors like required coursework, internships, and exams.

If you're considering a move, research how to become a mental health counselor in Omaha or how to become a mental health counselor in Orlando to understand what is needed to practice in those cities. An online degree in psychology can offer the flexibility to meet these varying requirements, making it easier for you to pursue your chosen career path wherever you are.

Best Scientists Citing John DeLuca

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles