World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 50 5444 5057 2974 2699 207 9804

Peter A. Arnett publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter A. Arnett between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter A. Arnett published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2022. 17 of the 247 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2022. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 5 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 7 publications
1992 2025

247 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter A. Arnett: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 1
1995 1
1996 5
1997 6
1998 2
1999 5
2000 2
2001 3
2002 3
2003 0
2004 3
2005 7
2006 4
2007 7
2008 9
2009 5
2010 10
2011 4
2012 4
2013 9
2014 8
2015 16
2016 15
2017 4
2018 10
2019 12
2020 15
2021 19
2022 20
2023 19
2024 10
2025 7
Total 247
Download as CSV

Peter A. Arnett publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. Arnett sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 207 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 207
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter A. Arnett D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. Arnett sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 50
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter A. Arnett is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Clinical Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

Their work addresses a range of topics, notably:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Sleep and related disorders
  • Resilience and Mental Health

Recent papers authored by or involving Peter A. Arnett include:

  • A new look at an old test: Normative data of the symbol digit modalities test -Oral version, 2020, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
  • Tired of not knowing what that fatigue score means? Normative data of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), 2020, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
  • A much needed metric: Defining reliable and statistically meaningful change of the oral version Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), 2021, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
  • Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy programme to reduce depressive symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis: a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial, 2023, The Lancet Digital Health
  • The accumulation of subconcussive impacts on cognitive, imaging, and biomarker outcomes in child and college-aged athletes: a systematic review, 2021, Brain Imaging and Behavior

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Peter A. Arnett include:

  • Garrett A Thomas
  • Kaitlin E Riegler
  • Megan L Bradson
  • Erin Guty
  • Margaret Cadden

The main venues where Peter A. Arnett has published are:

  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
  • Translational Issues in Psychological Science
  • Neuropsychology

Best Publications

  • Minimal neuropsychological assessment of MS patients: a consensus approach.

    Ralph H.B. Benedict;Ralph H.B. Benedict;Jill S. Fischer;Cate J. Archibald;Peter Andrew Arnett

  • Relationship between frontal lobe lesions and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in patients with multiple sclerosis

    Peter A. Arnett;S. M. Rao;L. Bernardin;J. Grafman

  • The Goldman Consensus statement on depression in multiple sclerosis

    Randolph B. Schiffer;Peter Arnett;Aliza Ben-Zacharia;Ralph Benedict

  • Factors related to employment status changes in individuals with multiple sclerosis.

    Megan M Smith;Peter A Arnett

  • Treatment adherence in multiple sclerosis: association with emotional status, personality, and cognition

    Jared M. Bruce;Laura M. Hancock;Peter Arnett;Sharon Lynch

  • Depression in multiple sclerosis: review and theoretical proposal

    Peter A. Arnett;Fiona H. Barwick;Joe E. Beeney

  • Depression in multiple sclerosis: relationship to working memory capacity.

    Peter A. Arnett;Christopher I. Higginson;William D. Voss;William I. Bender

  • Depressed mood in multiple sclerosis: relationship to capacity-demanding memory and attentional functioning.

    Peter A. Arnett;Christopher I. Higginson;William D. Voss;Bruce Wright

  • Executive functions in multiple sclerosis: an analysis of temporal ordering, semantic encoding, and planning abilities.

    Peter A. Arnett;Stephen M. Rao;Jordan Grafman;Linda Bernardin

  • The development of a survey to examine knowledge about and attitudes toward concussion in high-school students

    Aaron M. Rosenbaum;Peter A. Arnett

  • Relationship Between Coping, Cognitive Dysfunction and Depression in Multiple Sclerosis

    Peter A Arnett;Christopher I Higginson;William D Voss;John J Randolph

  • Depression in multiple sclerosis: relationship to planning ability.

    Peter A. Arnett;Christopher I. Higginson;John J. Randolph

  • Approach and Avoidance Motivation in Psychopathic Criminal Offenders During Passive Avoidance

    Peter A. Arnett;Stevens S. Smith;Joseph P. Newman

  • An examination of four models predicting fatigue in multiple sclerosis

    Lauren B. Strober;Peter A. Arnett

  • Neuropsychological differentiation of psychopathic and nonpsychopathic criminal offenders.

    Stevens S. Smith;Peter A. Arnett;Joseph P. Newman

  • Predictors and Prevalence of Postconcussion Depression Symptoms in Collegiate Athletes

    Gray Vargas;Amanda Rabinowitz;Jessica Meyer;Peter A. Arnett

  • EEG correlates of fatigue during administration of a neuropsychological test battery

    Fiona Barwick;Peter Andrew Arnett;Semyon Slobounov

  • Worsening of symptoms is associated with lower physical activity levels in individuals with multiple sclerosis.

    Robert W. Motl;P. A. Arnett;M. M. Smith;F. H. Barwick

  • AUTONOMIC RESPONSIVITY IN PSYCHOPATHS: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND THEORETICAL PROPOSAL

    Peter A. Arnett

  • The ecological validity of clinical tests of memory and attention in multiple sclerosis.

    Christopher I. Higginson;Peter A. Arnett;William D. Voss

Frequent Co-Authors

Jared M. Bruce
Jared M. Bruce University of Missouri–Kansas City
Stephen M. Rao
Stephen M. Rao Cleveland Clinic
Joseph P. Newman
Joseph P. Newman University of Wisconsin–Madison
Ruben J. Echemendia
Ruben J. Echemendia University of Missouri–Kansas City
Semyon Slobounov
Semyon Slobounov Pennsylvania State University
Ralph H.B. Benedict
Ralph H.B. Benedict University at Buffalo, State University of New York
John DeLuca
John DeLuca Kessler Foundation
Dennis R. Combs
Dennis R. Combs The University of Texas at Tyler
Nancy D. Chiaravalloti
Nancy D. Chiaravalloti Kessler Foundation
Thomas A. Hammeke
Thomas A. Hammeke Medical College of Wisconsin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA can open the door to a variety of online programs and diverse career opportunities in mental health. Many students opt for online bachelor’s or master’s degrees in psychology or counseling to gain foundational knowledge and professional flexibility.

If your goal is to work directly with clients as a counselor, requirements can vary depending on your location. For instance, if you want to learn how to become a mental health counselor in Milwaukee, you will need to meet state-specific criteria that typically include an accredited master’s degree, supervised clinical experience, and licensure exams.

Other cities, such as Minneapolis and Nashville, have their own regulations. If you’re interested in Minneapolis mental health counselor certification requirements or want to know Nashville mental health counselor certification requirements, it’s crucial to review local licensing rules before choosing a program.

For those interested in working in Louisiana, see what is needed to become a mental health counselor in New Orleans. Always check regional licensing boards for the latest updates to ensure your degree and professional plans align.

Best Scientists Citing Peter A. Arnett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles