World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nancy D. Chiaravalloti

Nancy D. Chiaravalloti

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 58 3865 3563 2167 1949 235 13366
Neuroscience 60 3825 3499 1746 1573 273 13903

Nancy D. Chiaravalloti publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nancy D. Chiaravalloti between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nancy D. Chiaravalloti published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 11.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2014. 23 of the 289 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2014. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 8 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 27 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 11 publications
2001 2025

289 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nancy D. Chiaravalloti: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 1
2003 8
2004 5
2005 3
2006 3
2007 4
2008 3
2009 9
2010 8
2011 6
2012 8
2013 14
2014 27
2015 18
2016 17
2017 16
2018 19
2019 15
2020 26
2021 17
2022 10
2023 27
2024 12
2025 11
Total 289
Download as CSV

Nancy D. Chiaravalloti publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy D. Chiaravalloti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 268–277 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 273 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175 273
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Nancy D. Chiaravalloti D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy D. Chiaravalloti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328 60
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Nancy D. Chiaravalloti is affiliated with the Kessler Foundation in the United States and specializes in medical research with a strong focus on multiple sclerosis and related neurological conditions. Their research contributions span several interconnected fields of medicine, such as pathology and forensic medicine, cognitive neuroscience, neurology, epidemiology, and psychiatry and mental health.

Their research topics include:

  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Chiaravalloti's recent publications reflect their focus on neurological disorders and cognitive rehabilitation. Notable papers include:

  • Treatment and management of cognitive dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis, 2020, Nature Reviews Neurology
  • Traumatic brain injury as a chronic disease: insights from the United States Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Research Program, 2023, The Lancet Neurology
  • The emotional impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals with progressive multiple sclerosis, 2020, Journal of Neurology
  • Neurological update: cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis, 2021, Journal of Neurology
  • Cognitive rehabilitation and aerobic exercise for cognitive impairment in people with progressive multiple sclerosis (CogEx): a randomised, blinded, sham-controlled trial, 2023, The Lancet Neurology

Their frequent co-authors reflect a collaborative research network, including:

  • John DeLuca
  • Brian M. Sandroff
  • Amber Salter
  • Jeremy Chataway
  • Ulrik Dalgas

Chiaravalloti has published extensively in venues that focus on neurology and rehabilitation, including:

  • Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
  • Journal of Neurology
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Multiple Sclerosis Journal

Their work contributes to advancing understanding and treatment of cognitive dysfunction, especially in the context of multiple sclerosis and traumatic brain injury. Their research intersects clinical management, rehabilitation strategies, and the neurological impacts of broader health events such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Best Publications

  • Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis

    Nancy D Chiaravalloti;John DeLuca

  • Is speed of processing or working memory the primary information processing deficit in multiple sclerosis

    John DeLuca;Gordon J. Chelune;David S. Tulsky;Jean Lengenfelder

  • Evidenced-based cognitive rehabilitation for persons with multiple sclerosis: a review of the literature.

    Amanda R. O’Brien;Nancy Chiaravalloti;Yael Goverover;John DeLuca

  • Intellectual enrichment is linked to cerebral efficiency in multiple sclerosis: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for cognitive reserve

    James F. Sumowski;Glenn R. Wylie;Glenn R. Wylie;John DeLuca;John DeLuca;Nancy Chiaravalloti;Nancy Chiaravalloti

  • Symbol Digit Modalities Test: A valid clinical trial endpoint for measuring cognition in multiple sclerosis:

    Lauren Strober;John DeLuca;Ralph Hb Benedict;Adam Jacobs

  • A comparison of memory performance in relapsing-remitting, primary progressive and secondary progressive, multiple sclerosis

    Elizabeth A. Gaudino;Nancy D. Chiaravalloti;John Deluca;Bruce J. Diamond

  • Information processing speed in multiple sclerosis: Past, present, and future

    Silvana L Costa;Helen M Genova;John DeLuca;Nancy D Chiaravalloti

  • NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB): list sorting test to measure working memory.

    David S. Tulsky;David S. Tulsky;Noelle Carlozzi;Nancy D. Chiaravalloti;Jennifer L. Beaumont

  • Naming and recognizing famous faces in temporal lobe epilepsy

    G. Glosser;A.E. Salvucci;N.D. Chiaravalloti

  • Treatment and management of cognitive dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis

    John DeLuca;Nancy D. Chiaravalloti;Brian M. Sandroff

  • An RCT to treat learning impairment in multiple sclerosis: The MEMREHAB trial.

    Nancy D. Chiaravalloti;Nancy B. Moore;Olga M. Nikelshpur;John DeLuca

  • Cognitive reserve moderates the negative effect of brain atrophy on cognitive efficiency in multiple sclerosis.

    James F. Sumowski;Nancy Chiaravalloti;Glenn Wylie;John Deluca

  • Treating learning impairments improves memory performance in multiple sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial.

    Nancy D Chiaravalloti;John DeLuca;Nancy B Moore;Joseph H Ricker

  • Examination of Cognitive Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Diffusion Tensor Imaging

    Helen M. Genova;Helen M. Genova;Venkateswaran Rajagopalan;Venkateswaran Rajagopalan;John DeLuca;John DeLuca;Abhijit Das;Abhijit Das

  • TBI-QOL: Development and Calibration of Item Banks to Measure Patient Reported Outcomes Following Traumatic Brain Injury.

    David S. Tulsky;David S. Tulsky;Pamela A. Kisala;David Victorson;Noelle Carlozzi

  • Cognitive reserve protects against cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.

    James F Sumowski;Nancy Chiaravalloti;John DeLuca

  • Aerobic exercise increases hippocampal volume and improves memory in multiple sclerosis: preliminary findings.

    V M Leavitt;C Cirnigliaro;A Cohen;A Farag

  • Vision Therapy in Adults with Convergence Insufficiency: Clinical and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures

    Tara L. Alvarez;Vincent R. Vicci;Yelda Alkan;Eun H. Kim

  • Differentiating simple versus complex processing speed: influence on new learning and memory performance.

    Nancy D. Chiaravalloti;Christopher Christodoulou;Heath A. Demaree;John DeLuca

  • Intellectual enrichment lessens the effect of brain atrophy on learning and memory in multiple sclerosis

    James F. Sumowski;Glenn R. Wylie;Nancy Chiaravalloti;John DeLuca

  • Prefrontal modulation of working memory performance in brain injury and disease

    Frank Gerard Hillary;Helen M. Genova;Helen M. Genova;Nancy D. Chiaravalloti;Nancy D. Chiaravalloti;Bart Rypma

  • The Wechsler Memory Scale, Third Edition: A New Perspective

    David S. Tulsky;Nancy D. Chiaravalloti;Barton W. Palmer;Gordon J. Chelune

Frequent Co-Authors

John DeLuca
John DeLuca Kessler Foundation
Glenn R. Wylie
Glenn R. Wylie Kessler Foundation
Helen M. Genova
Helen M. Genova Kessler Foundation
David S. Tulsky
David S. Tulsky University of Delaware
Angelle M. Sander
Angelle M. Sander Baylor College of Medicine
Noelle E. Carlozzi
Noelle E. Carlozzi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Allen W. Heinemann
Allen W. Heinemann Northwestern University
Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla
Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla BioCruces Health research Institute
Frank G. Hillary
Frank G. Hillary Pennsylvania State University
Óscar F. Gonçalves
Óscar F. Gonçalves University of Coimbra

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience opens doors to diverse careers across clinical, research, and counseling fields. Many students broaden their qualifications with advanced online degrees that offer flexibility and accelerated pathways.

For those interested in clinical psychology, shortest online psyD programs can help you earn your doctorate faster and gain the credentials needed for clinical practice. If counseling appeals to you, consider specialized mft programs that train professionals to work with families and couples in various therapeutic settings.

Undergraduate students aiming to quickly enter the workforce or advance in their studies might look into an accelerated bachelor's degree online. These programs are designed to shorten your time to graduation while maintaining academic rigor.

When planning your academic journey, it’s also important to consider long-term earning potential. Learn more about some of the best degrees in the world for salary prospects and job security.

Best Scientists Citing Nancy D. Chiaravalloti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles