World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
8036
World Ranking
11051
National Ranking
5766

David Faust publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Faust sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 112 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David Faust D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Faust sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1992 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

David Faust is affiliated with the University of Rhode Island in the United States. Their research spans several fields within psychology and medicine, focusing primarily on areas related to psychological testing, traumatic brain injury, and forensic psychology.

Faust's published works include studies on cognitive and psychological testing, as well as commentary on forensic assessment practices. Key recent papers include:

  • Immediate Post-concussion and Cognitive Testing: Ceiling Effects, Reliability, and Implications for Interpretation (2020) published in Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • Invited Commentary: Advancing but not yet Advanced: Assessment of Effort/Malingering in Forensic and Clinical Settings (2023) published in Neuropsychology Review
  • Cooperative Collection Development: Current Practices among ARL Libraries for Area Studies Collections (2024) published in portal Libraries and the Academy
  • B - 118 Expert Insights on Cultural Responsiveness in Neuropsychological Assessments: Identifying the Discrepancy Between Importance and Feasibility (2025) published in Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Faust include:

  • Charles E. Gaudet
  • Jeff G. Konin
  • Brian Vetruba
  • Burcu Kaplan

Their work is predominantly published in venues such as:

  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • Neuropsychology Review
  • portal Libraries and the Academy

Faust's academic research covers major fields of study including Psychology and Medicine, with a focus on subfields like Epidemiology, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Emergency Medicine. Specific research topics addressed in their publications feature:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Deception Detection and Forensic Psychology
  • Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Counseling Practices and Supervision

David Faust has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) since 1992, reflecting their established status within the psychological research community.

Best Publications

  • Clinical versus actuarial judgment

    Robyn M. Dawes;David Faust;Paul E. Meehl

  • Eliminating the hindsight bias.

    Hal R. Arkes;David Faust;Thomas J. Guilmette;Kathleen Hart

  • The expert witness in psychology and psychiatry.

    David Faust;Jay Ziskin

  • Neuropsychologists' capacity to detect adolescent malingerers.

    David Faust;Kathleen J. Hart;Thomas J. Guilmette;Hal R. Arkes

  • Bedside cognitive screening instruments. A critical assessment.

    Aaron Nelson;Barry S. Fogel;David Faust

  • The limits of scientific reasoning

    David Faust

  • Pediatric malingering: the capacity of children to fake believable deficits on neuropsychological testing.

    David Faust;Kathleen J. Hart;Thomas J. Guilmette

  • Clinical judgment and decision making in neuropsychology.

    Danny Wedding;David Faust

  • Research on human judgment and its application to clinical practice.

    David Faust

  • Examining the effects of chronic disease and disability on children's sibling relationships

    D. Lobato;D. Faust;A. Spirito

  • A national survey of psychologists who offer neuropsychological services.

    Thomas J. Guilmette;David Faust;Kathleen Hart;Hal R. Arkes

  • Neuropsychologists' training, experience, and judgment accuracy

    David Faust;Thomas J. Guilmette;Kathleen Hart;Hal R. Arkes

  • Practicing Psychologists' Knowledge of General Psychotherapy Research Findings: Implications for Science-Practice Relations

    Charles M. Boisvert;David Faust

  • Presence of third party observers during neuropsychological testing: Official statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology

    Bradley Axelrod;Jeffrey Barth;David Faust;Jerid Fisher

  • Moderately elevated blood lead levels: effects on neuropsychologic functioning in children.

    David Faust;James Brown

  • The Detection of Deception

    David Faust

  • The development and initial validation of a sensitive bedside cognitive screening test.

    David Faust;Barry S. Fogel

  • Iatrogenic Symptoms in Psychotherapy

    Unknown

  • The use of anatomically detailed dolls in sexual abuse evaluations: The state of the science

    Glenn Wolfner;David Faust;Robyn M. Dawes

  • The Base-Rate Fallacy in School Psychology:

    Mary Lynne Kennedy;W. Grant Willis;David Faust

  • Errors in hand scoring objective personality tests: The case of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire—Revised (PDQ—R).

    Gregory Allard;Julian Butler;David Faust;M. Tracie Shea

  • Heuristics and Biases: Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment

    Robyn M. Dawes;David Faust;Paul E. Meehl

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul E. Meehl
Paul E. Meehl University of Minnesota
Robyn M. Dawes
Robyn M. Dawes Carnegie Mellon University
Niels G. Waller
Niels G. Waller University of Minnesota
Mark F. Lenzenweger
Mark F. Lenzenweger Binghamton University
Glenn J. Larrabee
Glenn J. Larrabee Veterans Health Administration
Hal R. Arkes
Hal R. Arkes The Ohio State University
Bradley N. Axelrod
Bradley N. Axelrod United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Anthony Spirito
Anthony Spirito Brown University
Jeffrey T. Barth
Jeffrey T. Barth University of Virginia
Paul J. Eslinger
Paul J. Eslinger Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens doors to numerous career opportunities, especially in counseling and therapy. Many students consider pursuing a Masters in Marriage and Family Therapy, which prepares professionals to support individuals, couples, and families facing emotional or relationship challenges.

Requirements to become a marriage and family therapist vary by state and city. For specific regional insights, see our guides on how to become a marriage and family therapist in Buffalo, as well as how to become an mft in Chandler. Both paths highlight the importance of earning an accredited graduate degree, supervised clinical experience, and passing the required licensing exams.

Students can also consult local guidelines, such as mft requirements in Charlotte and Chesapeake mft education requirements. Online degrees often offer the flexibility to meet these standards while balancing other obligations. No matter your location, understanding the educational and licensing criteria is vital for launching a successful career in family therapy or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing David Faust

Trending Scientists