World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
71
Citations
54627
World Ranking
2098
National Ranking
1217

Paul E. Meehl publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul E. Meehl sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 151 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Paul E. Meehl D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul E. Meehl sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1998 - James McKeen Cattell Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science
  • 1996 - APA Award for Lifetime Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association.
  • 1993 - APA Award for Distinguished Professional Contributions to Applied Research
  • 1993 - Joseph Zubin Award, Society for Research in Psychopathology
  • 1989 - William James Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science (APA)
  • 1987 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1979 - Bruno Klopfer Award, Society for Personality Assessment
  • 1958 - APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association

Overview

Paul E. Meehl was affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Throughout a distinguished career, they contributed to the field of psychology across various dimensions.

The scientist was recognized with multiple awards and honors throughout their career, including the APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology from the American Psychological Association in 1958, the Bruno Klopfer Award from the Society for Personality Assessment in 1979, and election as a Member of the National Academy of Sciences in 1987.

Additional honors included the William James Fellow Award from the Association for Psychological Science (APA) in 1989, the Joseph Zubin Award from the Society for Research in Psychopathology in 1993, the APA Award for Distinguished Professional Contributions to Applied Research in 1993, the APA Award for Lifetime Contributions to Psychology in 1996, and the James McKeen Cattell Fellow Award from the Association for Psychological Science in 1998.

There is no record of recent papers, coauthors, book publications, publication venues, or specific fields of study associated with Meehl's work in the provided data.

Best Publications

  • Construct validity in psychological tests.

    Lee J. Cronbach;Paul E. Meehl

  • Clinical versus actuarial judgment

    Robyn M. Dawes;David Faust;Paul E. Meehl

  • Schizotaxia, Schizotypy, Schizophrenia

    Paul E. Meehl

  • Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology

    Paul E Meehl

  • Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence

    Paul E. Meehl

  • Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical–statistical controversy.

    William M. Grove;Paul E. Meehl

  • Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores

    Paul E. Meehl;Albert Rosen

  • On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables.

    Kenneth MacCorquodale;Paul E. Meehl

  • Theory-testing in psychology and physics: A methodological paradox

    Paul E. Meehl

  • Toward an Integrated Theory of Schizotaxia, Schizotypy, and Schizophrenia

    Paul E. Meehl

  • Why Summaries of Research on Psychological Theories are Often Uninterpretable

    Paul E. Meehl

  • Bootstraps taxometrics: Solving the classification problem in psychopathology.

    Paul E. Meehl

  • Multivariate Taxometric Procedures: Distinguishing Types from Continua

    Niels G. Waller;Paul E. Meehl

  • Clinical versus Statistical Prediction.

    Raymond F. Sletto;Paul E. Meehl

  • Appraising and Amending Theories: The Strategy of Lakatosian Defense and Two Principles that Warrant It

    Paul E. Meehl

  • Factors and Taxa, Traits and Types, Differences of Degree and Differences in Kind

    Paul E. Meehl

  • The dynamics of "structured" personality tests.

    Paul E. Meehl

  • Taxometric analysis. I: Detecting taxonicity with two quantitative indicators using means above and below a sliding cut (MAMBAC procedure)

    Paul E. Meehl;Leslie J. Yonce

  • Causes and Effects of My Disturbing Little Book

    Paul E. Meehl

  • Psychodiagnosis: Selected Papers

    Paul E. Meehl

  • Heuristics and Biases: Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment

    Robyn M. Dawes;David Faust;Paul E. Meehl

Frequent Co-Authors

David Faust
David Faust University of Rhode Island
Robyn M. Dawes
Robyn M. Dawes Carnegie Mellon University
Niels G. Waller
Niels G. Waller University of Minnesota
William M. Grove
William M. Grove University of Minnesota
Harrison G. Gough
Harrison G. Gough University of California, Berkeley
William K. Estes
William K. Estes Harvard University
Dante Cicchetti
Dante Cicchetti University of Minnesota
Harry F. Harlow
Harry F. Harlow University of Wisconsin–Madison
Charles E. Osgood
Charles E. Osgood University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Irving L. Janis
Irving L. Janis Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology can open up many options, whether you want to become a therapist, counselor, or explore research. Pursuing an online degree in psychology is a flexible way to start your journey, leading to a range of roles in mental health, education, and social services.

To work as a licensed therapist in the United States, specific educational paths and licensing requirements must be met—and they can vary by state or city. For example, St. Petersburg licensed therapist requirements include a master’s degree, supervised clinical hours, and passing a national exam. If you're interested in California, Stockton licensed therapist education requirements provide guidance on state-specific steps.

Similarly, licensed therapist requirements in Tampa and how to become a licensed therapist in Toledo cover the local details you need to know. No matter where you study, an online psychology degree can help build a foundation for these rewarding career paths.

Best Scientists Citing Paul E. Meehl

Recently Published Articles