World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
58
Citations
30066
World Ranking
3769
National Ranking
2109

Robyn M. Dawes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robyn M. Dawes sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 158 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Robyn M. Dawes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robyn M. Dawes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)
  • 1989 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Robyn M. Dawes was affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their academic career involved work in the domain of statistics and science, recognized by honors awarded by prominent organizations in these fields.

Dawes was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1989. Later, in 2006, they were also designated as a Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA). These fellowships indicate a formal acknowledgment of contributions to the fields related to science and statistical research.

The available data does not detail specific research papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, or defined fields and subfields of study. There is also no information on book publications or the main topics covered by this scientist's work.

The factual record focuses primarily on Dawes' affiliations and recognitions within scientific communities, which reflect an active presence in the academic discipline related to statistics and science advancement during their professional life.

Best Publications

  • Clinical versus actuarial judgment

    Robyn M. Dawes;David Faust;Paul E. Meehl

  • The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making.

    Robyn M. Dawes

  • Linear models in decision making.

    Robyn M. Dawes;Bernard Corrigan

  • Social Dilemmas

    Unknown

  • Rational choice in an uncertain world

    Robyn M. Dawes;Jerome Kagan

  • Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation.

    Robyn M Dawes;Jeanne McTavish;Harriet Shaklee

  • Psychological Science Can Improve Diagnostic Decisions

    John A. Swets;Robyn M. Dawes;John Monahan

  • House of Cards - Psychology and Psychotherapy Built on Myth

    Robyn M. Dawes

  • Rational choice in an uncertain world : the psychology of judgment and decision making

    Reid Hastie;Robyn M. Dawes

  • What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Costly (but quiet) exit in dictator games

    Jason Dana;Daylian M. Cain;Robyn M. Dawes

  • Better decisions through science.

    John A. Swets;Robyn M. Dawes;John Monahan

  • A case study of graduate admissions: Application of three principles of human decision making.

    Robyn M. Dawes

  • A Conceptual Review of Decision Making in Social Dilemmas: Applying a Logic of Appropriateness

    J. Mark Weber;Shirli Kopelman;David M. Messick

  • Swift Neighbors and Persistent Strangers: A Cross- Cultural Investigation of Trust and Reciprocity in Social Exchange

    Nancy R. Buchan;Rachel T. A. Croson;Robyn M. Dawes

  • Mathematical psychology : an elementary introduction

    C.H. Coombs;R.M. Dawes;A. Tversky

  • Selfishness examined: Cooperation in the absence of egoistic incentives.

    Linnda R. Caporael;Robyn M. Dawes;John M. Orbell;Alphons J. C. van de Kragt

  • Explaining discussion-induced cooperation.

    Unknown

  • Not me or thee but we: The importance of group identity in eliciting cooperation in dilemma situations: Experimental manipulations

    Robyn M. Dawes;Alphons J.C. Van De Kragt;John M. Orbell

  • Statistical criteria for establishing a truly false consensus effect

    Robyn M Dawes

  • Factors influencing the use of a decision rule in a probabilistic task

    Hal R Arkes;Robyn M Dawes;Caryn Christensen

  • The minimal contributing set as a solution to public goods problems

    Alphons J. C. van de Kragt;John M. Orbell;Robyn M. Dawes

  • Information Sampling and Adaptive Cognition

    Klaus Fiedler;Peter Juslin

  • House of Cards: Psychology and Psychotherapy Built on Myth.

    Malcolm J. Sherman;Robyn M. Dawes

  • Heuristics and Biases: Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment

    Robyn M. Dawes;David Faust;Paul E. Meehl

Frequent Co-Authors

David Faust
David Faust University of Rhode Island
Paul E. Meehl
Paul E. Meehl University of Minnesota
John A. Swets
John A. Swets Raytheon (United States)
Wändi Bruine de Bruin
Wändi Bruine de Bruin University of Southern California
Amos Tversky
Amos Tversky Stanford University
John Monahan
John Monahan University of Virginia
Hal R. Arkes
Hal R. Arkes The Ohio State University
Baruch Fischhoff
Baruch Fischhoff Carnegie Mellon University
Henry L. Roediger
Henry L. Roediger Washington University in St. Louis
Larry L. Jacoby
Larry L. Jacoby Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a range of online study options and rewarding career pathways, especially in mental health. There is growing demand for qualified professionals like mental health counselors across the United States. As you explore online degrees, be aware that each state and city can have different certification and education requirements.

For example, if you're interested in working in Tennessee, you should understand specific mental health counselor requirements in Memphis. Similarly, for those considering a career in Arizona, the mental health counselor requirements in Mesa may apply.

If you're looking towards Florida, take note of the mental health counselor requirements in Miami. For those evaluating opportunities in Wisconsin, the Milwaukee mental health counselor certification requirements are also important.

Many online programs are designed to meet these local standards, preparing you for licensing exams and career advancement. It’s vital to research the requirements in your intended location, ensuring that the degree you earn aligns with your professional goals and state regulations.

Best Scientists Citing Robyn M. Dawes

Recently Published Articles