World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
71
Citations
85914
World Ranking
275
National Ranking
126

J. Scott Armstrong publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Scott Armstrong sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 305 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

J. Scott Armstrong D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Scott Armstrong sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. Scott Armstrong was affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research spanned multiple disciplines, including oncology, management of technology and innovation, sociology and political science, management science and operations research, and general economics, econometrics, and finance.

They contributed to several fields of study with a focus primarily on topics related to forecasting techniques and applications, lung cancer research studies, innovative approaches in technology and social development, entrepreneurship studies and influences, innovation, technology, and society, monetary policy and economic impact, and cancer genomics and diagnostics.

The frequent co-authors with whom J. Scott Armstrong collaborated included:

  • Kesten C. Green
  • Andreas Graefe
  • Mingchao Xie
  • Haiyi Jiang
  • Karen Benzies

Armstrong published in diverse venues reflecting the range of their research interests. These venues included:

  • Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
  • The RUSI Journal
  • PS Political Science & Politics
  • Cancer Research
  • Cambridge University Press eBooks

Prominent papers authored by Armstrong were:

  • "The PollyVote Popular Vote Forecast for the 2020 US Presidential Election" (2020, PS Political Science & Politics)
  • "Violent Resistance in Occupied Ukraine: An Assessment of Network Capabilities, Access and Utility" (2025, The RUSI Journal)
  • "Index" (2022, Cambridge University Press eBooks)

Additionally, Armstrong contributed to papers outside direct authorship such as "Defining social innovation for post-secondary educational institutions: a concept analysis" (2024, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications) and an oncology-focused abstract titled "Durvalumab (D) plus tremelimumab (T) in platinum-refractory/resistant extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC): Efficacy, safety and ctDNA dynamics from Arm A of the phase 2 BALTIC study" (2022, Cancer Research).

Armstrong authored the book The Scientific Method, published by Cambridge University Press in 2022, contributing to discussions around methodological rigor in scientific investigation.

Best Publications

  • Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys

    J. Scott Armstrong;Terry S. Overton

  • Harvard Business Review: David M. Georgoff and Robert G. Murdick, manager's guide to forecasting, 64 (Jan-Feb.) (1986) 110-120

    J.Scott Armstrong;David M. Georgoff

  • The value of formal planning for strategic decisions: Review of empirical research

    J. Scott Armstrong

  • Journal of economic literature: Clifford Winston, 1993, Economic deregulation: Days of reckoning for microeconomists, 31, 1263–1289.

    J.Scott Armstrong

  • Replications and Extensions in Marketing: Rarely Published but Quite Contrary

    Raymond Hubbard;J. Scott Armstrong

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

    J.Scott Armstrong

  • Competitor Orientation: Effects of Objectives and Information on Managerial Decisions and Profitability

    J. Scott Armstrong;Fred Collopy

  • Monetary incentives in mail surveys

    J. Scott Armstrong

  • Peer Review for Journals: Evidence on Quality Control, Fairness, and Innovation

    J. Scott Armstrong

  • Long-Range Forecasting: From Crystal Ball to Computer

    J. Scott Armstrong

  • Social Irresponsibility in Management

    J.Scott Armstrong

  • Replication research's disturbing trend

    Heiner Evanschitzky;Carsten Baumgarth;Raymond Hubbard;J. Scott Armstrong

  • Sales forecasts for existing consumer products and services: Do purchase intentions contribute to accuracy?

    J.Scott Armstrong;Vicki G. Morwitz;V. Kumar

  • Methods to Elicit Forecasts from Groups: Delphi and Prediction Markets Compared

    Kesten C. Green;J. Scott Armstrong;Andreas Graefe

  • Unintelligible Management Research and Academic Prestige

    J. Scott Armstrong

  • Comparing face-to-face meetings, nominal groups, Delphi and prediction markets on an estimation task

    Andreas Graefe;J. Scott Armstrong

  • Simple versus complex forecasting: The evidence

    Kesten C. Green;J. Scott Armstrong;J. Scott Armstrong

  • Research on Scientific Journals: Implications for Editors and Authors

    J. Scott Armstrong

  • Effects of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility policies

    J. Scott Armstrong;J. Scott Armstrong;Kesten C. Green

  • International journal of public administration: Lance Eliot Brouthers, parties, ideology and elections: The politics of federal revenues and expenditures forecasting, 8 (1986) 289–314

    J.Scott Armstrong;Lance Eliot Brouthers

  • Methods to Elicit Forecasts from Groups: Delphi and Prediction Markets Compared

    J. Scott Armstrong

  • Combining forecasts: The end of the beginning or the beginning of the end?

    J.Scott Armstrong

  • Public opinion quarterly

    J.Scott Armstrong

Frequent Co-Authors

Roderick J. Brodie
Roderick J. Brodie University of Auckland
Heiner Evanschitzky
Heiner Evanschitzky University of Manchester
Robert Fildes
Robert Fildes Lancaster University
David B. Montgomery
David B. Montgomery Stanford University
Nicole Coviello
Nicole Coviello Lappeenranta University of Technology
Vicki G. Morwitz
Vicki G. Morwitz Columbia University
Spyros Makridakis
Spyros Makridakis University of Nicosia
Christopher Wlezien
Christopher Wlezien The University of Texas at Austin
Robert S. Erikson
Robert S. Erikson Columbia University
Michael S. Lewis-Beck
Michael S. Lewis-Beck University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens up new doors for anyone interested in Business and Management careers in the USA. Many students now choose flexible learning options, including online university programs, which allow them to balance work, life, and studies.

There’s a wide array of online degrees that align with different business career paths. For those interested in becoming leaders or consultants, an online doctorate in organizational leadership provides advanced knowledge and credentials for executive roles. If you are drawn to the building sector, earning an online construction management degree offers skills highly sought after in construction planning and project management.

The healthcare field is also expanding rapidly, and healthcare management programs online prepare students to lead in hospitals, clinics, or insurance companies. No matter your interests, online degrees in business-related fields give you practical training and credentials valued by employers across the nation.

Best Scientists Citing J. Scott Armstrong

Recently Published Articles