World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
41
Citations
10154
World Ranking
4929
National Ranking
834

Paul Goodwin publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Goodwin sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 148 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Paul Goodwin D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Goodwin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Goodwin is affiliated with the University of Bath in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily falls within the field of Decision Sciences, with a significant focus on Management Science and Operations Research.

Their recent papers include:

  • Forecasting: theory and practice, 2022, published in BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca)
  • Stability in the inefficient use of forecasting systems: A case study in a supply chain company, 2020, published in International Journal of Forecasting
  • Forecasting: theory and practice, 2022, published in International Journal of Forecasting
  • Forecast Value Added in Demand Planning, 2023, published in SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Assessing Point Forecast Bias Across Multiple Time Series: Measures and Visual Tools, 2021, published in International Journal of Statistics and Probability

Frequent co-authors in Paul Goodwin's work include:

  • Robert Fildes
  • Shari De Baets
  • Fotios Petropoulos
  • M. Sinan Gönül
  • Nigel Harvey

Paul Goodwin's publications appear mainly in the following venues:

  • International Journal of Forecasting
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca)
  • PLoS ONE
  • Futures & Foresight Science

The scientist has contributed to book publications with the University of Massachusetts Amherst. One title is noted: The British-owned railroads and the Unión Cívica Radical: a study in the political uses of foreign capital, 1916-1930, published in 2021.

In terms of research topics, Paul Goodwin's work covers:

  • Forecasting Techniques and Applications
  • Energy Load and Power Forecasting
  • Stock Market Forecasting Methods
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Spreadsheets and End-User Computing
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Subfields of study include:

  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Management Information Systems
  • Software
  • General Decision Sciences

Best Publications

  • Decision Analysis for Management Judgment

    Paul Goodwin;George Wright

  • Judgmental forecasting: A review of progress over the last 25 years

    Michael Lawrence;Paul Goodwin;Marcus O'Connor;Dilek Önkal

  • Effective forecasting and judgmental adjustments: an empirical evaluation and strategies for improvement in supply-chain planning

    Robert Fildes;Paul Goodwin;Michael Lawrence;Konstantinos Nikolopoulos

  • Enhancing Strategy Evaluation in Scenario Planning: a Role for Decision Analysis

    Paul Goodwin;George Wright

  • On the asymmetry of the symmetric MAPE

    Paul Goodwin;Richard Lawton

  • The relative influence of advice from human experts and statistical methods on forecast adjustments

    Dilek Önkal;Paul Goodwin;Mary E. Thomson;Sinan Gönül

  • Against Your Better Judgment? How Organizations Can Improve Their Use of Management Judgment in Forecasting

    Robert Fildes;Paul Goodwin

  • Decision making and planning under low levels of predictability: enhancing the scenario method

    George Wright;Paul Goodwin

  • Weight approximations in multi-attribute decision models

    Ron Roberts;Paul Goodwin

  • The limits of forecasting methods in anticipating rare events

    Paul Goodwin;George Wright

  • The Holt-Winters Approach to Exponential Smoothing: 50 Years Old and Going Strong

    Paul Goodwin

  • Judgmental forecasts of time series affected by special events: does providing a statistical forecast improve accuracy?

    Paul Goodwin;Robert Fildes

  • Integrating management judgment and statistical methods to improve short-term forecasts ☆

    Paul Goodwin

  • The design features of forecasting support systems and their effectiveness

    Robert Fildes;Paul Goodwin;Michael Lawrence

  • The effects of integrating management judgement into intermittent demand forecasts

    Argyrios Syntetos;Konstantinos Nikolopoulos;John E. Boylan;Robert Fildes

  • Improving the voluntary integration of statistical forecasts and judgment

    Paul Goodwin

  • Improving judgmental time series forecasting: A review of the guidance provided by research

    Paul Goodwin;George Wright

  • Forecasting with cue information: A comparison of multiple regression with alternative forecasting approaches

    Konstantinos Nikolopoulos;P. Goodwin;Alexandros Patelis;Vassilis Assimakopoulos

  • Future‐focussed thinking: combining scenario planning with decision analysis

    George Wright;Paul Goodwin

  • Providing support for the use of analogies in demand forecasting tasks

    Wing Yee Lee;Paul Goodwin;Robert Fildes;Konstantinos Nikolopoulos

  • Journal of behavioral decision making: J.S. Lim and M. O'Connor, 1995, Judgemental adjustment of initial forecasts: its effectiveness and biases, 8, 149–168.

    Paul Goodwin

  • Principles of forecasting: A handbook for researchers and practitioners

    Paul Goodwin;J.Keith Ord;Lars-Erik Öller;Janet A Sniezek

  • Judgment and Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Reader

    Paul Goodwin

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Fildes
Robert Fildes Lancaster University
George Wright
George Wright University of Strathclyde
Haiyan Song
Haiyan Song Hong Kong Polytechnic University
David F. Hendry
David F. Hendry University of Oxford
Michael P. Clements
Michael P. Clements University of Reading
Ricardo J. Bessa
Ricardo J. Bessa University of Porto
Pierre Pinson
Pierre Pinson Technical University of Denmark
Spyros Makridakis
Spyros Makridakis University of Nicosia
Robert L. Winkler
Robert L. Winkler Duke University
Robin M. Hogarth
Robin M. Hogarth Pompeu Fabra University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in advancing their careers in the social sciences and humanities, online programs offer flexible and accessible options to earn accredited degrees. Popular fields include social work, psychology, counseling, and marriage and family therapy. Many universities now offer accelerated and affordable degrees that can be completed from anywhere in the world.

If you are considering a career in social work, there are options for 1 year msw programs online no bsw, which allow individuals from diverse academic backgrounds to enter the profession quickly. Likewise, those interested in psychology can benefit from 2 year psychology degree online programs, offering a fast track to a range of roles in mental health, education, or research.

If counseling is your focus, seek out the cacrep online masters in counseling for accredited, high-quality education at a lower cost. Similarly, many institutions feature online marriage and family therapy graduate programs for those wishing to provide vital support services to families and couples.

Choosing the right online program can open doors to meaningful careers and further study in the social sciences and humanities, all while providing flexibility for your unique needs.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Goodwin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles