World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Cornelius Schwarz

Cornelius Schwarz

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
32
Citations
4323
World Ranking
9524
National Ranking
797

Cornelius Schwarz publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cornelius Schwarz sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 97 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Cornelius Schwarz D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cornelius Schwarz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cornelius Schwarz is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany. Their research focuses primarily on the field of neuroscience, with significant contributions in cognitive neuroscience, cellular and molecular neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, ophthalmology, and neurology.

Their principal research topics encompass neural dynamics and brain function, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, tactile and sensory interactions, motor control and adaptation, visual perception and processing mechanisms, multisensory perception and integration, and neuroscience and neuropharmacology research.

Publications have appeared in various venues frequently including bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), eNeuro, Journal of Neurophysiology, Scientific Reports, and Brain Stimulation.

  • Mapping the Brain-Wide Network Effects by Optogenetic Activation of the Corpus Callosum, 2020, Cerebral Cortex
  • Functional analysis of information rates conveyed by rat whisker-related trigeminal nuclei neurons, 2021, Journal of Neurophysiology
  • Propofol Affects Cortico-Hippocampal Interactions via β3 Subunit-Containing GABAA Receptors, 2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Adaptive Whisking in Mice, 2022, Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
  • Discerning state estimation and sensory gating, two presumptive predictive signals in mouse barrel cortex, 2023, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Cornelius Schwarz has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Arindam Bhattacharjee
  • Shubhodeep Chakrabarti
  • Christoph Braun
  • Sergejus Butovas
  • Maysam Oladazimi

Best Publications

  • Barrel cortex function

    Dirk Feldmeyer;Michael Brecht;Fritjof Helmchen;Carl C. H. Petersen

  • Spatiotemporal effects of microstimulation in rat neocortex: a parametric study using multielectrode recordings.

    Sergejus Butovas;Cornelius Schwarz

  • Neocortex is the major target of sedative concentrations of volatile anaesthetics: strong depression of firing rates and increase of GABAA receptor‐mediated inhibition

    Harald Hentschke;Cornelius Schwarz;Bernd Antkowiak

  • The Head-fixed Behaving Rat—Procedures and Pitfalls

    Cornelius Schwarz;Harald Hentschke;Sergejus Butovas;Florent Haiss

  • Spatial segregation of different modes of movement control in the whisker representation of rat primary motor cortex.

    Florent Haiss;Cornelius Schwarz

  • Morphological types of projection neurons in layer 5 of cat visual cortex.

    Mark Hübener;Cornelius Schwarz;Jürgen Bolz

  • Efficacy and short-term plasticity at GABAergic synapses between Purkinje and cerebellar nuclei neurons.

    Christine M. Pedroarena;Cornelius Schwarz

  • Psychophysical and neurometric detection performance under stimulus uncertainty

    Maik C Stüttgen;Cornelius Schwarz

  • Binding of signals relevant for action: towards a hypothesis of the functional role of the pontine nuclei.

    Cornelius Schwarz;Peter Thier

  • Central Signals Rapidly Switch Tactile Processing in Rat Barrel Cortex during Whisker Movements

    Harald Hentschke;Florent Haiss;Cornelius Schwarz

  • Two psychophysical channels of whisker deflection in rats align with two neuronal classes of primary afferents.

    Maik C. Stüttgen;Johannes Rüter;Cornelius Schwarz

  • Effects of electrically coupled inhibitory networks on local neuronal responses to intracortical microstimulation

    Sergejus Butovas;Sheriar G. Hormuzdi;Hannah Monyer;Cornelius Schwarz

  • Lifting the veil on the dynamics of neuronal activities evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Bingshuo Li;Juha P Virtanen;Axel Oeltermann;Cornelius Schwarz

  • Detection psychophysics of intracortical microstimulation in rat primary somatosensory cortex.

    Sergejus Butovas;Cornelius Schwarz

  • Mapping Spikes to Sensations

    Maik Christopher Stüttgen;Cornelius Schwarz;Frank Jäkel

  • Two types of neurons in the rat cerebellar nuclei as distinguished by membrane potentials and intracellular fillings.

    Uwe Czubayko;Fahad Sultan;Peter Thier;Cornelius Schwarz

  • Integration of Vibrotactile Signals for Whisker-Related Perception in Rats Is Governed by Short Time Constants: Comparison of Neurometric and Psychometric Detection Performance

    Maik C Stüttgen;Cornelius Schwarz

  • The Slip Hypothesis: Tactile Perception and its Neuronal Bases

    Cornelius Schwarz

  • Discrimination of Vibrotactile Stimuli in the Rat Whisker System: Behavior and Neurometrics

    Todor V. Gerdjikov;Caroline G. Bergner;Maik C. Stüttgen;Christian Waiblinger

  • Projection From the Cerebellar Lateral Nucleus to Precerebellar Nuclei in the Mossy Fiber Pathway Is Glutamatergic: A Study Combining Anterograde Tracing With Immunogold Labeling in the Rat

    Cornelius Schwarz;Yvonne Schmitz

  • Functional analysis of ultra high information rates conveyed by rat vibrissal primary afferents.

    André Maia Chagas;Lucas Theis;Biswa Sengupta;Maik Christopher Stüttgen

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Thier
Peter Thier University of Tübingen
M. A. Lisa
M. A. Lisa The Ohio State University
Alan P. Koretsky
Alan P. Koretsky National Institutes of Health
Cameron Tropea
Cameron Tropea Technical University of Darmstadt
Ulf Ziemann
Ulf Ziemann University of Tübingen
Martin A. Giese
Martin A. Giese University of Tübingen
Christoph Braun
Christoph Braun University of Tübingen
Matthias Bethge
Matthias Bethge University of Tübingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience online opens doors to various career pathways, especially as digital education grows. Many students aim for majors that make the most money, and neuroscience-related fields—like biomedical engineering and cognitive science—often appear on that list. Online degrees can put these high-earning opportunities within reach.

Affordability is another key consideration. Enrolling in online schools that accept fafsa can make educational goals more accessible, helping students manage tuition expenses while pursuing neuroscience or related programs.

Flexible learning options extend beyond degrees. Earning certifications online can boost your qualifications and expand job options in neuroscience-adjacent fields, such as healthcare tech, data analysis, or clinical research.

For those starting out, consider reviewing online college courses that provide a strong foundation in biology or psychology, often prerequisites for advanced neuroscience study. By diversifying your credentials through flexible online pathways, you can prepare for a dynamic future in neuroscience and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Cornelius Schwarz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles