World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Freek E. Hoebeek

Freek E. Hoebeek

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
6703
World Ranking
8295
National Ranking
222

Freek E. Hoebeek publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Freek E. Hoebeek sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 92 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Freek E. Hoebeek D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Freek E. Hoebeek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Freek E. Hoebeek is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine with a particular focus on subfields such as Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems.

The scientist's work covers diverse topics including Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research, Vestibular and Auditory Disorders, Neonatal and Fetal Brain Pathology, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, Neuroscience of Respiration and Sleep, Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders, and Photoreceptor and Optogenetics Research.

Frequent coauthors in research projects include:

  • Chris I. De Zeeuw
  • Jeroen Dudink
  • Henk-Jan Boele
  • Martijn Schonewille
  • Niek E. van der Aa

They have contributed to various publication venues, including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cell Reports
  • Cells
  • eLife
  • Pediatric Research

Among notable recent papers are:

  • Homologous organization of cerebellar pathways to sensory, motor, and associative forebrain, 2021, Cell Reports
  • Differential spatiotemporal development of Purkinje cell populations and cerebellum-dependent sensorimotor behaviors, 2021, eLife
  • Cerebellar injury in term neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy is underestimated, 2020, Pediatric Research
  • Single-pulse stimulation of cerebellar nuclei stops epileptic thalamic activity, 2021, Brain Stimulation
  • AMPAR Auxiliary Protein SHISA6 Facilitates Purkinje Cell Synaptic Excitability and Procedural Memory Formation, 2020, Cell Reports

In addition to journal articles, Freek E. Hoebeek has contributed to book publications. One example is a book titled The Thalamus, published in 2022 by Cambridge University Press.

Best Publications

  • Spatiotemporal firing patterns in the cerebellum

    Chris I. De Zeeuw;Chris I. De Zeeuw;Freek E. Hoebeek;Laurens W. J. Bosman;Laurens W. J. Bosman;Martijn Schonewille

  • Cerebellar modules operate at different frequencies

    Haibo Zhou;Zhanmin Lin;Kai Voges;Chiheng Ju

  • Reevaluating the Role of LTD in Cerebellar Motor Learning

    Martijn Schonewille;Zhenyu Gao;Henk Jan Boele;Maria F. Vinueza Veloz

  • Use of hippocampal and amygdalar volumes on magnetic resonance imaging to predict dementia in cognitively intact elderly people.

    Tom den Heijer;Mirjam I. Geerlings;Freek E. Hoebeek;Albert Hofman

  • Synaptic inhibition of Purkinje cells mediates consolidation of vestibulo-cerebellar motor learning

    Peer Wulff;Martijn Schonewille;Massimiliano Renzi;Laura Viltono

  • Purkinje Cell-Specific Knockout of the Protein Phosphatase PP2B Impairs Potentiation and Cerebellar Motor Learning

    M. Schonewille;A. Belmeguenai;A. Belmeguenai;S.K.E. Koekkoek;S.H. Houtman

  • Dysfunctional cerebellar Purkinje cells contribute to autism-like behaviour in Shank2-deficient mice.

    Saša Peter;Michiel M. Ten Brinke;Jeffrey Stedehouder;Claudia M. Reinelt

  • High cortical spreading depression susceptibility and migraine-associated symptoms in Ca(v)2.1 S218L mice.

    Arn M. J. M. van den Maagdenberg;Tommaso Pizzorusso;Simon Kaja;Nicole Terpolilli

  • Calbindin in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells Is a Critical Determinant of the Precision of Motor Coordination

    J. J. Barski;J. Hartmann;C. R. Rose;F. Hoebeek

  • Cerebellar LTD and Pattern Recognition by Purkinje Cells

    Volker Steuber;Volker Steuber;Wolfgang Mittmann;Freek E. Hoebeek;R. Angus Silver

  • Silencing the Majority of Cerebellar Granule Cells Uncovers Their Essential Role in Motor Learning and Consolidation

    Elisa Galliano;Zhenyu Gao;Martijn Schonewille;Boyan Todorov

  • Increased Noise Level of Purkinje Cell Activities Minimizes Impact of Their Modulation during Sensorimotor Control

    F.E. Hoebeek;J.S. Stahl;A.M. van Alphen;M. Schonewille

  • |[beta]|CaMKII controls the direction of plasticity at parallel fiber|[ndash]|Purkinje cell synapses

    Geeske M van Woerden;Freek E Hoebeek;Zhenyu Gao;Raghavendra Y Nagaraja

  • Excitatory Cerebellar Nucleocortical Circuit Provides Internal Amplification during Associative Conditioning

    Zhenyu Gao;Martina Proietti-Onori;Zhanmin Lin;Michiel M. ten Brinke

  • Purkinje cells in awake behaving animals operate at the upstate membrane potential.

    Martijn Schonewille;Sara Khosrovani;Beerend H J Winkelman;Freek E Hoebeek

  • Consensus Paper: Experimental Neurostimulation of the Cerebellum

    Lauren L.N. Miterko;Kenneth K.B. Baker;Jaclyn Beckinghausen;Lynley L.V. Bradnam

  • Differential olivo-cerebellar cortical control of rebound activity in the cerebellar nuclei

    Freek E. Hoebeek;Laurens Witter;Tom J. H. Ruigrok;Chris I. De Zeeuw;Chris I. De Zeeuw

  • Cerebellar Output Controls Generalized Spike-and-Wave Discharge Occurrence

    Lieke Kros;Oscar H J Eelkman Rooda;Jochen K Spanke;Parimala Alva

  • Climbing fiber input shapes reciprocity of purkinje cell firing

    Aleksandra Badura;Martijn Schonewille;Kai Voges;Elisa Galliano

  • Regular patterns in cerebellar Purkinje cell simple spike trains.

    Soon-Lim Shin;Freek E. Hoebeek;Martijn Schonewille;Chris I. De Zeeuw

  • Causes and Consequences of Oscillations in the Cerebellar Cortex

    Chris I. De Zeeuw;Chris I. De Zeeuw;Freek E. Hoebeek;Martijn Schonewille

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris I. De Zeeuw
Chris I. De Zeeuw Erasmus University Rotterdam
Tom J. H. Ruigrok
Tom J. H. Ruigrok Erasmus University Rotterdam
Arn M. J. M. van den Maagdenberg
Arn M. J. M. van den Maagdenberg Leiden University Medical Center
Erik De Schutter
Erik De Schutter Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology
Egidio D'Angelo
Egidio D'Angelo University of Pavia
Wouter A. Serdijn
Wouter A. Serdijn Delft University of Technology
Ype Elgersma
Ype Elgersma Erasmus University Rotterdam
William Wisden
William Wisden Imperial College London
Maarten A. Frens
Maarten A. Frens Erasmus University Rotterdam
Dick Jaarsma
Dick Jaarsma Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Neuroscience opens doors to dynamic, high-impact careers. Many students look for interesting majors that pay well, and Neuroscience is often on that list. Its intersection with healthcare, technology, and research makes it both versatile and rewarding.

For those needing flexibility, online education is a great solution. There are numerous online colleges that take financial aid, making advanced education more accessible for everyone. Many reputable institutions offer online courses, certificates, and even full degrees in related subjects.

If you’re considering adding a boost to your Neuroscience credentials, look into certificate programs that pay well. These short-term programs can complement your degree and open up specialized career opportunities. Some students also prefer to take online courses for faster upskilling or exploring different fields before committing.

Whether you’re aiming for research, clinical roles, or branching into technology, there are many affordable, flexible online pathways that fit your goals in Neuroscience and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Freek E. Hoebeek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles