World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
6218
World Ranking
8103
National Ranking
3476

Dieter Jaeger publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dieter Jaeger sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 244 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Dieter Jaeger D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dieter Jaeger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dieter Jaeger is affiliated with Emory University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of neuroscience, medicine, and engineering. Their research primarily focuses on neural dynamics and brain function, encompassing a broad spectrum of topics including neuroscience and neural engineering, neuropharmacology, neurological disorders, photoreceptor and optogenetics research, and brain-computer interfaces.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Medicine
  • Engineering

In more specific subfields, their work is distributed across cognitive neuroscience, cellular and molecular neuroscience, neurology, electrical and electronic engineering, and surgery.

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Neurology
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Surgery

Key topics addressed in their research include:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Dieter Jaeger has published recent papers across various notable scientific journals. Noteworthy publications include:

  • "Thalamic bursting and the role of timing and synchrony in thalamocortical signaling in the awake mouse," 2022, Neuron
  • "Thalamic input to motor cortex facilitates goal-directed action initiation," 2021, Current Biology
  • "Premotor Ramping of Thalamic Neuronal Activity Is Modulated by Nigral Inputs and Contributes to Control the Timing of Action Release," 2021, Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Brain rhythms control microglial response and cytokine expression via NF-κB signaling," 2023, Science Advances
  • "Widefield imaging of rapid pan-cortical voltage dynamics with an indicator evolved for one-photon microscopy," 2023, Nature Communications

Frequent co-authors working with Dieter Jaeger include:

  • Ranu Jung
  • Yunmiao Wang
  • Robert N. S. Sachdev
  • Matthew E. Larkum
  • Timothy A. Zolnik

Publications appear frequently in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Journal of Neuroscience, eNeuro, and proceedings from international scientific meetings.

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • eNeuro
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition

Best Publications

  • Modeling single-neuron dynamics and computations: a balance of detail and abstraction.

    Andreas V. M. Herz;Tim Gollisch;Christian K. Machens;Dieter Jaeger

  • Membrane potential synchrony of simultaneously recorded striatal spiny neurons in vivo

    Edward A. Stern;Dieter Jaeger;Charles J. Wilson

  • Surround inhibition among projection neurons is weak or nonexistent in the rat neostriatum

    D. Jaeger;Hitoshi Kita;C. J. Wilson

  • Resonant Antidromic Cortical Circuit Activation as a Consequence of High-Frequency Subthalamic Deep-Brain Stimulation

    Su Li;Gordon W Arbuthnott;Michael J Jutras;Joshua A Goldberg

  • Infraslow LFP correlates to resting-state fMRI BOLD signals

    Wen-Ju Pan;Garth John Thompson;Matthew Evan Magnuson;Dieter Jaeger

  • The Control of Rate and Timing of Spikes in the Deep Cerebellar Nuclei by Inhibition

    Volker Gauck;Dieter Jaeger

  • Quasi-periodic patterns (QPP): Large-scale dynamics in resting state fMRI that correlate with local infraslow electrical activity

    Garth John Thompson;Wen-Ju Pan;Matthew Evan Magnuson;Dieter Jaeger

  • Prolonged responses in rat cerebellar Purkinje cells following activation of the granule cell layer: an intracellular in vitro and in vivo investigation.

    Dieter Jaeger;James M. Bower

  • Broadband local field potentials correlate with spontaneous fluctuations in functional magnetic resonance imaging signals in the rat somatosensory cortex under isoflurane anesthesia.

    Wen-Ju Pan;Garth Thompson;Matthew Magnuson;Waqas Majeed

  • The Role of Synaptic and Voltage-Gated Currents in the Control of Purkinje Cell Spiking: A Modeling Study

    Dieter Jaeger;Erik De Schutter;James M. Bower

  • Optogenetic stimulation of cortico-subthalamic projections is sufficient to ameliorate bradykinesia in 6-ohda lesioned mice.

    Teresa H. Sanders;Dieter Jaeger

  • Channel density distributions explain spiking variability in the globus pallidus: a combined physiology and computer simulation database approach.

    Cengiz Günay;Jeremy R. Edgerton;Dieter Jaeger

  • Synaptic Control of Spiking in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells: Dynamic Current Clamp Based on Model Conductances

    Dieter Jaeger;James M. Bower

  • Neural correlates of time-varying functional connectivity in the rat.

    Garth John Thompson;Michael Donelyn Merritt;Wen-Ju Pan;Matthew Evan Magnuson

  • Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience

    Dieter Jaeger;Ranu Jung

  • Neuronal activity in the striatum and pallidum of primates related to the execution of externally cued reaching movements.

    Dieter Jaeger;Sid Gilman;J. Wayne Aldridge

  • Primate basal ganglia activity in a precued reaching task : preparation for movement

    Dieter Jaeger;Sid Gilman;J. Wayne Aldridge

  • Functional connectivity and integrative properties of globus pallidus neurons.

    Dieter Jaeger;Hitoshi Kita

  • The Roles of the Olivocerebellar Pathway in Motor Learning and Motor Control. A consensus paper

    Eric J Lang;Richard Apps;Fredrik Bengtsson;Nadia L Cerminara

  • Coding of tactile response properties in the rat deep cerebellar nuclei.

    Nathan C. Rowland;Dieter Jaeger

  • Short-Term Plasticity Shapes the Response to Simulated Normal and Parkinsonian Input Patterns in the Globus Pallidus

    Jesse E. Hanson;Dieter Jaeger

Frequent Co-Authors

Detlef H. Heck
Detlef H. Heck University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Chris I. De Zeeuw
Chris I. De Zeeuw Erasmus University Rotterdam
James M. Bower
James M. Bower The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Erik De Schutter
Erik De Schutter Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology
Sid Gilman
Sid Gilman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
J. Wayne Aldridge
J. Wayne Aldridge University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Yoland Smith
Yoland Smith Emory University
Kamran Khodakhah
Kamran Khodakhah Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Hitoshi Kita
Hitoshi Kita University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Simone Kühn
Simone Kühn Max Planck Institute for Human Development

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Dieter Jaeger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles