World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 62 2982 2828 1302 1223 166 13443

Andrew J. Wyrobek publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew J. Wyrobek between 1972 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew J. Wyrobek published across 53 years, from 1972 to 2024, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2023. 27 of the 225 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2023. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 2 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 3 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 4 publications 1982: 6 publications 1983: 8 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 15 publications 1997: 14 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 6 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication 2016: 2 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 1 publication
1972 2024

225 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew J. Wyrobek: publications per year, 1972 to 2024
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 1
1975 2
1976 1
1977 1
1978 1
1979 3
1980 1
1981 4
1982 6
1983 8
1984 6
1985 5
1986 1
1987 2
1988 1
1989 0
1990 3
1991 2
1992 1
1993 3
1994 8
1995 4
1996 15
1997 14
1998 7
1999 4
2000 1
2001 6
2002 5
2003 11
2004 7
2005 8
2006 9
2007 8
2008 7
2009 10
2010 3
2011 2
2012 5
2013 3
2014 1
2015 1
2016 2
2017 2
2018 1
2019 0
2020 1
2021 0
2022 0
2023 26
2024 1
Total 225
Download as CSV

Andrew J. Wyrobek publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew J. Wyrobek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 165–174 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 166 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170 166
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew J. Wyrobek D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew J. Wyrobek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191 62
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Andrew J. Wyrobek is affiliated with Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with particular attention to Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Physiology.

The scientist's work spans multiple topics including:

  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
  • Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment

Andrew J. Wyrobek has contributed to several research papers, among them:

  • Meiotic susceptibility for induction of sperm with chromosomal aberrations in patients receiving combination chemotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Benzene Exposure Near the U.S. Permissible Limit Is Associated with Sperm Aneuploidy, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Non-DNA radiosensitive targets that initiate persistent behavioral deficits in rats exposed to space radiation, 2024, Life Sciences in Space Research

Their frequent coauthors include Sara Frías, Paul Van Hummelen, Marvin L. Meistrich, T. Straume, and Ana M. Mora.

Andrew J. Wyrobek has published in scientific venues such as PLoS ONE, Life Sciences in Space Research, and UNC Libraries.

Best Publications

  • An evaluation of the mouse sperm morphology test and other sperm tests in nonhuman mammals: A report of the U.S. environmental protection agency Gene-Tox program

    Unknown

  • Basal Subtype and MAPK/ERK Kinase (MEK)-Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Feedback Signaling Determine Susceptibility of Breast Cancer Cells to MEK Inhibition

    Olga K. Mirzoeva;Debopriya Das;Laura M. Heiser;Sanchita Bhattacharya

  • Advancing age has differential effects on DNA damage, chromatin integrity, gene mutations, and aneuploidies in sperm

    A. J. Wyrobek;B. Eskenazi;S. Young;N. Arnheim

  • Chemotherapy induces transient sex chromosomal and autosomal aneuploidy in human sperm.

    Wendie A. Robbins;Marvin L. Meistrich;Dan Moore;Fredrick B. Hagemeister

  • Dna packaging in mouse spermatids. Synthesis of protamine variants and four transition proteins.

    Rod Balhorn;Sue Weston;Cynthia Thomas;Andrew J. Wyrobek

  • The effects of male age on sperm DNA damage in healthy non-smokers

    T.E. Schmid;B. Eskenazi;A. Baumgartner;F. Marchetti

  • Gene expression changes in mouse brain after exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation.

    Unknown

  • The Paternal-Age Effect in Apert Syndrome Is Due, in Part, to the Increased Frequency of Mutations in Sperm

    Rivka L. Glaser;Karl W. Broman;Rebecca L. Schulman;Brenda Eskenazi

  • Molecular distinctions between stasis and telomere attrition senescence barriers shown by long-term culture of normal human mammary epithelial cells.

    James C. Garbe;Sanchita Bhattacharya;Batul Merchant;Ekaterina Bassett;Ekaterina Bassett

  • Candidate protein biodosimeters of human exposure to ionizing radiation

    Unknown

  • Three-probe fluorescence in situ hybridization to assess chromosome X, Y, and 8 aneuploidy in sperm of 14 men from two healthy groups: evidence for a paternal age effect on sperm aneuploidy.

    WA Robbins;JE Baulch;D Moore;HU Weier

  • Detection of aneuploid human sperm by fluorescence in situ hybridization : Evidence for a donor difference in frequency of sperm disomic for chromosomes 1 and Y

    W A Robbins;R Segraves;D Pinkel;A J Wyrobek

  • The observed human sperm mutation frequency cannot explain the achondroplasia paternal age effect

    Irene Tiemann-Boege;William Navidi;Raji Grewal;Dan Cohn

  • Fluorescence in situ hybridization to Y chromosomes in decondensed human sperm nuclei.

    Andrew J. Wyrobek;Thomas Alhborn;Rod Balhorn;Larry Stanker

  • Chromosomes of human sperm: variability among normal individuals.

    B. Brandriff;L. Gordon;L. Ashworth;G. Watchmaker

  • Disruption of maternal DNA repair increases sperm-derived chromosomal aberrations

    Francesco Marchetti;Jeroun Essers;Roland Kanaar;Andrew J. Wyrobek

  • Low-dose irradiation alters the transcript profiles of human lymphoblastoid cells including genes associated with cytogenetic radioadaptive response.

    Matthew A. Coleman;Eric Yin;Leif E. Peterson;David Nelson

  • Effects of male age on the frequencies of germinal and heritable chromosomal abnormalities in humans and rodents

    Eddie Sloter;Eddie Sloter;Joginder Nath;Brenda Eskenazi;Andrew J Wyrobek

  • Temporal global changes in gene expression during temperature transition in Yersinia pestis

    Unknown

  • Frequency of XY sperm increases with age in fathers of boys with Klinefelter syndrome.

    Xiu Lowe;Brenda Eskenazi;David O. Nelson;Sharon Kidd

Frequent Co-Authors

Dan H. Moore
Dan H. Moore University of California, San Francisco
Brenda Eskenazi
Brenda Eskenazi University of California, Berkeley
Joe W. Gray
Joe W. Gray Oregon Health & Science University
Donald P. Evenson
Donald P. Evenson University of South Dakota
James D. Tucker
James D. Tucker Wayne State University
Rod Balhorn
Rod Balhorn Shal Technologies (United States)
Paul Van Hummelen
Paul Van Hummelen Harvard University
Michael D. Shelby
Michael D. Shelby National Institutes of Health
Kenneth W. Turteltaub
Kenneth W. Turteltaub Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Shan X. Wang
Shan X. Wang Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring genetics in the USA opens doors to various online degrees and career pathways in healthcare. For instance, many students interested in patient care choose nursing, but not all programs require standardized admissions tests. If you’re wondering, is the teas test required for all nursing programs? The answer is no—some schools offer alternative options for admission.

Another emerging path is the Licensed Practical Nurse route, with flexible study options available. Some schools now provide 6 months lpn program choices, allowing students to enter the workforce more quickly.

For leadership roles, many genetics graduates pursue healthcare management. Considering the cost of mha degree is important, as tuition rates and financial aid vary widely between institutions.

Finally, advanced academic careers are achievable through research or teaching-focused tracks. Those looking to earn a doctoral credential may find several affordable phd nursing programs online, combining flexibility with academic rigor.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew J. Wyrobek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles