World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 62 1845 1656 920 811 195 16534

James D. Tucker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James D. Tucker between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James D. Tucker published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2023. 18 of the 266 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2023. 1981: 2 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 13 publications 1995: 17 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 21 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 12 publications
1981 2025

266 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James D. Tucker: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 2
1982 0
1983 0
1984 4
1985 3
1986 3
1987 3
1988 4
1989 10
1990 6
1991 4
1992 3
1993 7
1994 13
1995 17
1996 11
1997 21
1998 9
1999 12
2000 6
2001 4
2002 5
2003 2
2004 3
2005 4
2006 2
2007 3
2008 5
2009 6
2010 7
2011 8
2012 1
2013 4
2014 6
2015 4
2016 0
2017 0
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 20
2023 25
2024 6
2025 12
Total 266
Download as CSV

James D. Tucker publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James D. Tucker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 187–196 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 195 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112 195
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

James D. Tucker D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James D. Tucker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105 62
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

James D. Tucker is affiliated with Wayne State University in the United States. Their primary research area lies within Computer Science, with a concentration on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Atmospheric Science, Geometry and Topology, and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty.

Their recent scholarly works encompass diverse topics spanning climate impact analysis, medical research, and statistical modeling. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Risk of suicide after diagnosis of severe physical health conditions: a retrospective cohort study of 47 million people" (2022) published in The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
  • "Safety and performance of a novel implantable sensor in the inferior vena cava under acute and chronic intravascular volume modulation" (2023) published in European Journal of Heart Failure
  • "Regression models using shapes of functions as predictors" (2020) published in Computational Statistics & Data Analysis
  • "RNA Sequencing Identifies Frequent Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase-associated Fusion Genes in Intraductal Tubulopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas" (2023) published in Gastroenterology
  • "Elastic functional changepoint detection of climate impacts from localized sources" (2023) published in Environmetrics

Throughout their career, Tucker has contributed to various main research topics including:

  • Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
  • Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
  • Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Statistical and numerical algorithms

Their frequent coauthors reflect collaborations across multiple projects and disciplines, featuring researchers such as Kurtis Shuler, Gabriel Huerta, Daniel Ries, Katherine Goode, and Marina N. Nikiforova.

James D. Tucker's research has been published in a range of academic venues, with multiple publications featured in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computational Statistics & Data Analysis
  • Environmetrics
  • Frontiers in Nuclear Engineering
  • Journal of the American Statistical Association

This body of work demonstrates active engagement in interdisciplinary research, spanning computational approaches, environmental statistics, and healthcare-related applications within computer science.

Best Publications

  • Molecular mechanisms of micronucleus, nucleoplasmic bridge and nuclear bud formation in mammalian and human cells

    M. Fenech;M. Kirsch-Volders;A. T. Natarajan;J. Surralles

  • XRCC2 and XRCC3, New Human Rad51-Family Members, Promote Chromosome Stability and Protect against DNA Cross-Links and Other Damages

    Nan Liu;Jane E. Lamerdin;Robert S. Tebbs;David Schild

  • Identification of aneuploidy‐inducing agents using cytokinesis‐blocked human lymphocytes and an antikinetochore antibody

    David A. Eastmond;James D. Tucker

  • Micronuclei as an index of cytogenetic damage: Past, present, and future

    J. A. Heddle;M. C. Cimino;M. Hayashi;F. Romagna

  • An interaction between the mammalian DNA repair protein XRCC1 and DNA ligase III.

    Keith W. Caldecott;Catherine K. McKeown;James D. Tucker;Siv Ljungquist

  • Sister-chromatid exchanges: a report of the GENE-TOX program.

    Samuel A. Latt;James Allen;Stephen E. Bloom;Anthony Carrano

  • Chromosome aberrations, micronuclei, aneuploidy, sister chromatid exchanges, and cancer risk assessment.

    J D Tucker;R J Preston

  • ReviewSister-chromatid exchange: second report of the Gene-Tox program

    James D. Tucker;Angela Auletta;Michael C. Cimino;Kerry L. Dearfield

  • A proposed system for scoring structural aberrations detected by chromosome painting.

    J. D. Tucker;W. F. Morgan;A. A. Awa;M. Bauchinger

  • Requirement for the Xrcc1 DNA base excision repair gene during early mouse development.

    Robert S. Tebbs;Margaret L. Flannery;Juanito J. Meneses;Andreas Hartmann

  • Characterization of the XRCC1-DNA ligase III complex in vitro and its absence from mutant hamster cells

    Keith W. Caldecott;James D. Tucker;Lawrence H. Stanker;Larry H. Thompson

  • The effects of age and lifestyle factors on the accumulation of cytogenetic damage as measured by chromosome painting

    Marilyn J. Ramsey;Dan H. Moore;Jane F. Briner;Denise A. Lee

  • Correction of chromosomal instability and sensitivity to diverse mutagens by a cloned cDNA of the XRCC3 DNA repair gene.

    Robert S. Tebbs;Ying Zhao;James D. Tucker;Julia B. Scheerer

  • Human population studies with cytogenetic biomarkers: review of the literature and future prospectives.

    Stefano Bonassi;Donatella Ugolini;Donatella Ugolini;Micheline Kirsch-Volders;Ulf Strömberg

  • Human ret proto-oncogene mapped to chromosome 10q11.2.

    Y Ishizaka;F Itoh;T Tahira;I Ikeda

  • Validation of Chromosome Painting as a Biodosimeter in Human Peripheral Lymphocytes Following Acute Exposure to Ionizing Radiation in Vitro

    J.D. Tucker;M.J. Ramsey;D.A. Lee;J.L. Minkler

  • Detection of DNA point mutations and mRNA expression levels by rolling circle amplification in individual cells

    Allen T. Christian;Melissa S. Pattee;Christina M. Attix;Beth E. Reed

  • Low-dose irradiation alters the transcript profiles of human lymphoblastoid cells including genes associated with cytogenetic radioadaptive response.

    Matthew A. Coleman;Eric Yin;Leif E. Peterson;David Nelson

  • Genotoxicity of compounds from cooked beef in repair-deficient CHO cells versus Salmonella mutagenicity

    L.H. Thompson;J.D. Tucker;S.A. Stewart;M.L. Christensen

  • International study of factors affecting human chromosome translocations

    Alice J. Sigurdson;Mina Ha;Mina Ha;Michael Hauptmann;Michael Hauptmann;Parveen Bhatti

Frequent Co-Authors

Larry H. Thompson
Larry H. Thompson Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Anthony V. Carrano
Anthony V. Carrano Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Dan H. Moore
Dan H. Moore University of California, San Francisco
James S. Felton
James S. Felton Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
James T. MacGregor
James T. MacGregor United States Food and Drug Administration
Andrew J. Wyrobek
Andrew J. Wyrobek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Adayapalam T. Natarajan
Adayapalam T. Natarajan Leiden University
Kenneth W. Turteltaub
Kenneth W. Turteltaub Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Kyle Steenland
Kyle Steenland Emory University
Elaine Ron
Elaine Ron National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring molecular biologists often benefit from exploring related fields and complementary career pathways. Many students consider interdisciplinary programs that link biology with psychology or counseling, increasing their versatility in biomedical and healthcare settings.

If you’re interested in the interface of biology and law, you may want to learn about what can I do with a masters in forensic psychology. This area applies scientific skills to criminal investigations and the justice system. For those passionate about genetic conditions and mental health among youth, a masters in child psychology can open doorways to research, therapy, and educational outreach.

Online programs are also popular for busy professionals. Many opt for online masters degrees in counseling to develop expertise in guiding individuals through emotional and biological challenges. Similarly, specializing in clinical analysis is possible through clinical psychologist online programs, which blend psychological theory with hands-on methodology—valuable skills for addressing brain and behavior disorders at the molecular level.

Whether your focus is laboratory research or patient interaction, these degree pathways can enhance your scientific career and broaden future possibilities.

Best Scientists Citing James D. Tucker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles