World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
7010
World Ranking
9290
National Ranking
459

Claudio Castellini publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudio Castellini sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 137 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Claudio Castellini D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudio Castellini sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Claudio Castellini is affiliated with the German Aerospace Center in Germany and has an extensive publication record primarily in the fields of Engineering and Neuroscience. Their research focuses on Biomedical Engineering and Cognitive Neuroscience, with significant contributions to Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, and Control and Systems Engineering.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

Castellini's recent publications reflect a focus on myocontrol, rehabilitation robotics, and neural interfaces. Selected papers include:

  • "Simultaneous and Proportional Real-Time Myocontrol of Up to Three Degrees of Freedom of the Wrist and Hand," 2022, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
  • "EMG-Driven Machine Learning Control of a Soft Glove for Grasping Assistance and Rehabilitation," 2022, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • "A direct spinal cord-computer interface enables the control of the paralysed hand in spinal cord injury," 2024, Brain
  • "Action interference in simultaneous and proportional myocontrol: comparing force- and electromyography," 2020, Journal of Neural Engineering
  • "Ultrasound as a Neurorobotic Interface: A Review," 2024, IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems

Their research is published frequently in these venues:

  • Frontiers in Neurorobotics
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Neural Engineering
  • Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
  • Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

Frequent collaborators include Marek Sierotowicz, Mathilde Connan, Markus Nowak, Donato Brusamento, and Dario Farina. Castellini has multiple joint publications with these researchers, indicating ongoing collaborative partnerships.

Best Publications

  • Electromyography data for non-invasive naturally-controlled robotic hand prostheses

    Manfredo Atzori;Arjan Gijsberts;Claudio Castellini;Barbara Caputo

  • Surface EMG in advanced hand prosthetics

    Claudio Castellini;Patrick van der Smagt

  • Characterization of a Benchmark Database for Myoelectric Movement Classification

    Manfredo Atzori;Arjan Gijsberts;Ilja Kuzborskij;Simone Elsig

  • Building the Ninapro database: A resource for the biorobotics community

    Manfredo Atzori;Arjan Gijsberts;Simone Heynen;Anne-Gabrielle Mittaz Hager

  • Hand synergies: Integration of robotics and neuroscience for understanding the control of biological and artificial hands

    Marco Santello;Matteo Bianchi;Marco Gabiccini;Emiliano Ricciardi

  • Movement Error Rate for Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods for sEMG-Based Hand Movement Classification

    Arjan Gijsberts;Manfredo Atzori;Claudio Castellini;Henning Müller

  • Proceedings of the first workshop on Peripheral Machine Interfaces: going beyond traditional surface electromyography

    Claudio Castellini;Panagiotis K. Artemiadis;Michael Wininger;Arash Ajoudani

  • Fine detection of grasp force and posture by amputees via surface electromyography.

    Claudio Castellini;Emanuele Gruppioni;Angelo Davalli;Giulio Sandini

  • Multi-subject/daily-life activity EMG-based control of mechanical hands.

    Claudio Castellini;Angelo Emanuele Fiorilla;Angelo Emanuele Fiorilla;Giulio Sandini

  • A dataset of continuous affect annotations and physiological signals for emotion analysis.

    Karan Sharma;Karan Sharma;Claudio Castellini;Egon L. van den Broek;Alin Albu-Schaeffer

  • SAT-Based Procedures for Temporal Reasoning

    Alessandro Armando;Alessandro Armando;Claudio Castellini;Enrico Giunchiglia

  • Using Ultrasound Images of the Forearm to Predict Finger Positions

    C. Castellini;G. Passig;E. Zarka

  • Stable myoelectric control of a hand prosthesis using non-linear incremental learning.

    Arjan Gijsberts;Rashida Bohra;David Sierra González;Alexander Werner

  • A Human-Robot Interaction Perspective on Assistive and Rehabilitation Robotics.

    Philipp Beckerle;Gionata Salvietti;Ramazan Unal;Domenico Prattichizzo

  • Trajectory planning for optimal robot catching in real-time

    Roberto Lampariello;Duy Nguyen-Tuong;Claudio Castellini;Gerd Hirzinger

  • EMG-based teleoperation and manipulation with the DLR LWR-III

    Jorn Vogel;Claudio Castellini;Patrick van der Smagt

  • Model adaptation with least-squares SVM for adaptive hand prosthetics

    Francesco Orabona;Claudio Castellini;Barbara Caputo;Angelo Emanuele Fiorilla

  • A comparative analysis of three non-invasive human-machine interfaces for the disabled

    Vikram Ravindra;Claudio Castellini

  • SAT-based planning in complex domains: concurrency, constraints and nondeterminism

    Claudio Castellini;Enrico Giunchiglia;Armando Tacchella

  • Improving Control of Dexterous Hand Prostheses Using Adaptive Learning

    T. Tommasi;F. Orabona;C. Castellini;B. Caputo

  • A realistic implementation of ultrasound imaging as a human-machine interface for upper-limb amputees.

    David Sierra González;Claudio Castellini

Frequent Co-Authors

Barbara Caputo
Barbara Caputo Polytechnic University of Turin
Giulio Sandini
Giulio Sandini Italian Institute of Technology
Francesco Orabona
Francesco Orabona King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Dario Farina
Dario Farina Imperial College London
Henning Müller
Henning Müller University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland
Enrico Giunchiglia
Enrico Giunchiglia University of Genoa
Strahinja Dosen
Strahinja Dosen Aalborg University
Patrick van der Smagt
Patrick van der Smagt Volkswagen Group (United States)
Antonio Bicchi
Antonio Bicchi Italian Institute of Technology
Giorgio Metta
Giorgio Metta Italian Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options in Computer Science or related fields can open up flexible pathways for your career. Many students and professionals are now considering programs from the cheapest online colleges to minimize costs without compromising on quality.

For those looking to enter the workforce quickly, programs that offer a fastest online master's degree can help you earn an advanced qualification in as little as one year. Such programs are ideal for accelerating your career progression or switching fields.

If you are just starting out, an online associates degree can provide the foundational skills needed for entry-level tech jobs or serve as a stepping stone toward a bachelor's or master's degree.

When choosing an advanced degree, consider enrolling in the best masters degree to get, one that aligns with high-demand areas in technology and ensures long-term career growth.

Whether you seek affordability, speed, or high earning potential, online degree options provide a range of possibilities to match your goals in Computer Science and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Claudio Castellini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles