World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Enrico Giunchiglia

Enrico Giunchiglia

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
8017
World Ranking
9195
National Ranking
258

Enrico Giunchiglia publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enrico Giunchiglia sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 132 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Enrico Giunchiglia D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enrico Giunchiglia sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Enrico Giunchiglia is affiliated with the University of Genoa in Italy and works primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their research focuses substantially on Artificial Intelligence, with related interests spanning Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Science Applications, and Software.

The main topics addressed in Enrico Giunchiglia's work include:

  • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, notably:

  • Matteo Cardellini
  • Marco Maratea
  • Qiang Shen
  • Haotian Feng
  • Rui Song

Enrico Giunchiglia's publications are distributed across several venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Artificial Intelligence

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Enrico Giunchiglia include:

  • "Causal Laws and Multi-Valued Fluents," 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Symbolic Numeric Planning with Patterns," 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Symbolic Numeric Planning with Patterns," 2024, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "Temporal Numeric Planning with Patterns," 2025, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "Federated Multi-Task Attention for Cross-Individual Human Activity Recognition," 2022, Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Best Publications

  • NuSMV 2: An OpenSource Tool for Symbolic Model Checking

    Alessandro Cimatti;Edmund M. Clarke;Enrico Giunchiglia;Fausto Giunchiglia

  • Nonmonotonic causal theories

    Enrico Giunchiglia;Joohyung Lee;Vladimir Lifschitz;Norman McCain

  • Nusmv version 2: an opensource tool for symbolic model checking

    Alessandro Cimatti;Edmund M. Clarke;Enrico Giunchiglia;Fausto Giunchiglia

  • An action language based on causal explanation: preliminary report

    Enrico Giunchiglia;Vladimir Lifschitz

  • Benefits of Bounded Model Checking at an Industrial Setting

    Fady Copty;Limor Fix;Ranan Fraer;Enrico Giunchiglia

  • Answer Set Programming Based on Propositional Satisfiability

    Enrico Giunchiglia;Yuliya Lierler;Marco Maratea

  • Planning via Model Checking: A Decision Procedure for AR

    Alessandro Cimatti;Fausto Giunchiglia;Enrico Giunchiglia;Paolo Traverso

  • QUBE: A System for Deciding Quantified Boolean Formulas Satisfiability

    Enrico Giunchiglia;Massimo Narizzano;Armando Tacchella

  • SAT-Based Procedures for Temporal Reasoning

    Alessandro Armando;Alessandro Armando;Claudio Castellini;Enrico Giunchiglia

  • Clause/term resolution and learning in the evaluation of quantified Boolean formulas

    Enrico Giunchiglia;Massimo Narizzano;Armando Tacchella

  • Representing action: indeterminacy and ramifications

    Enrico Giunchiglia;G. Neelakantan Kartha;Vladimir Lifschitz

  • Backjumping for quantified Boolean logic satisfiability

    Enrico Giunchiglia;Massimo Narizzano;Armando Tacchella

  • Learning for quantified boolean logic satisfiability

    Enrico Giunchiglia;Massimo Narizzano;Armando Tacchella

  • SAT-based planning in complex domains: concurrency, constraints and nondeterminism

    Claudio Castellini;Enrico Giunchiglia;Armando Tacchella

  • SAT-Based Decision Procedures for Classical Modal Logics

    Enrico Giunchiglia;Armando Tacchella;Fausto Giunchiglia

  • Non-omniscient belief as context-based reasoning

    Fausto Giunchiglia;Luciano Serafini;Enrico Giunchiglia;Marcello Frixione

  • SAT-based answer set programming

    Enrico Giunchiglia;Yuliya Lierler;Marco Maratea

  • Constraints and AI planning

    A. Nareyek;E.C. Freuder;R. Fourer;E. Giunchiglia

  • Act, and the rest will follow: exploiting determinism in planning as satisfiability

    Enrico Giunchiglia;Alessandro Massarotto;Roberto Sebastiani

  • Efficient semantic matching

    Fausto Giunchiglia;Mikalai Yatskevich;Enrico Giunchiglia

  • Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing

    Enrico Giunchiglia;Armando Tacchella

Frequent Co-Authors

Armando Tacchella
Armando Tacchella University of Genoa
Fausto Giunchiglia
Fausto Giunchiglia University of Trento
Alessandro Cimatti
Alessandro Cimatti Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Paolo Traverso
Paolo Traverso Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Roberto Sebastiani
Roberto Sebastiani University of Trento
Claudio Castellini
Claudio Castellini University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Luciano Serafini
Luciano Serafini Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Vladimir Lifschitz
Vladimir Lifschitz The University of Texas at Austin
Bernd Becker
Bernd Becker University of Freiburg
Marco Pistore
Marco Pistore Fondazione Bruno Kessler

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in Computer Science goes beyond just earning a bachelor’s degree. Many students explore online associate's degree programs as a flexible and affordable way to get started. These two-year degrees can help you learn key tech skills and provide entry into the workforce or a stepping stone toward further education.

If you’re looking to specialize or advance your career quickly, there are options for the quickest cheapest masters degree programs. These accelerated paths help you earn a respected qualification without putting your career on hold.

For those interested in long-term value, it’s useful to focus on the most worthwhile masters degrees in growing fields, such as artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and data science. These areas are highly valued by employers and can open doors to lucrative positions.

In addition to degrees, professionals often boost their earnings and job prospects through certifications that pay well. Many can be earned online in just a few months, adding valuable credentials to your resume.

Best Scientists Citing Enrico Giunchiglia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles