World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
63
Citations
23938
World Ranking
2689
National Ranking
1335

Vladimir Lifschitz publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vladimir Lifschitz sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 201 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Vladimir Lifschitz D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vladimir Lifschitz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1991 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)

Overview

Vladimir Lifschitz is primarily affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research is situated within the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computer Networks and Communications, and Information Systems and Management.

Their work extensively addresses topics related to Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge, as well as Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation. Other important areas of their research coverage include Logic, programming, and type systems, Semantic Web and Ontologies, AI-based Problem Solving and Planning, Advanced Algebra and Logic, and Natural Language Processing Techniques.

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Lifschitz, several have been published in the "Theory and Practice of Logic Programming" journal. These include:

  • "Verifying Tight Logic Programs with anthem and vampire" (2020)
  • "External Behavior of a Logic Program and Verification of Refactoring" (2023)
  • "Strong Equivalence of Logic Programs with Counting" (2022)
  • "Locally Tight Programs" (2024)
  • "Here and There with Arithmetic" (2021)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Lifschitz include Jorge Fandinno, Yuliya Lierler, Torsten Schaub, Zachary Hansen, and Nathan Temple. These research partnerships are reflected in shared publications across various topics related to logic programming and knowledge representation.

Lifschitz's work has been primarily published in scholarly venues such as:

  • Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
  • AI Magazine

In recognition of contributions to the field, Lifschitz was named Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) in 1991.

Best Publications

  • The stable model semantics for logic programming

    Michael Gelfond;Vladimir Lifschitz

  • Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases

    Michael Gelfond;Vladimir Lifschitz

  • Handbook of Knowledge Representation

    Frank van Harmelen;Vladimir Lifschitz;Bruce Porter

  • Logic programs with classical negation

    Michael Gelfond;Vladimir Lifschitz

  • Representing action and change by logic programs

    Michael Gelfond;Vladimir Lifschitz

  • Computing circumscription

    Vladimir Lifschitz

  • Strongly equivalent logic programs

    Vladimir Lifschitz;David Pearce;Agustín Valverde

  • Answer set programming and plan generation

    Vladimir Lifschitz

  • Nonmonotonic causal theories

    Enrico Giunchiglia;Joohyung Lee;Vladimir Lifschitz;Norman McCain

  • Answer Set Programming

    Vladimir Lifschitz

  • Answer set planning

    Vladimir Lifschitz

  • What is answer set programming

    Vladimir Lifschitz

  • Splitting a logic program

    Vladimir Lifschitz;Hudson Turner

  • ON THE SEMANTICS OF STRIPS

    Vladimir Lifschitz

  • Nested expressions in logic programs

    Vladimir Lifschitz;Lappoon R. Tang;Hudson Turner

  • Formal theories of action

    V. Lifschitz

  • Foundations of logic programming

    Vladimir Lifschitz

  • Pointwise circumscription

    V. Lifschitz

  • An action language based on causal explanation: preliminary report

    Enrico Giunchiglia;Vladimir Lifschitz

  • Formalizing Common Sense: Papers by John McCarthy

    John McCarthy;Vladimir Lifschitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Gelfond
Michael Gelfond Texas Tech University
Torsten Schaub
Torsten Schaub University of Potsdam
Enrico Giunchiglia
Enrico Giunchiglia University of Genoa
Luay Nakhleh
Luay Nakhleh Rice University
Peter Stone
Peter Stone The University of Texas at Austin
Chitta Baral
Chitta Baral Arizona State University
Frank van Harmelen
Frank van Harmelen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
John J. McCarthy
John J. McCarthy University of California, Irvine
Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Peter F. Patel-Schneider Palo Alto Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options can be a smart move for those interested in Computer Science careers in the USA. Many professionals look for flexible programs that deliver value and quality. For those on a budget, a cheap mba online can open doors to tech leadership roles, blending technical knowledge with essential business skills.

If you’re eager to accelerate your education, consider one year graduate programs that offer quick pathways into specialized areas. Some degrees emphasize speed and return on investment. For instance, the list of fastest degree to get online includes high-demand tech and IT credentials.

With the surge in artificial intelligence, pursuing an ai degree online can be particularly valuable. These programs equip students with the knowledge to enter booming fields like machine learning, data science, and automation. Whichever path you choose, online degrees in Computer Science and related areas can offer flexibility—and open up a range of exciting career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Vladimir Lifschitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles