World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Margaret Stroebe

Margaret Stroebe

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 75 1764 1585 101 96 222 27432

Margaret Stroebe publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Margaret Stroebe between 1974 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Margaret Stroebe published across 52 years, from 1974 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2013. 11 of the 230 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2013. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 12 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 9 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 11 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 9 publications 2025: 2 publications
1974 2025

230 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Margaret Stroebe: publications per year, 1974 to 2025
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 1
1981 0
1982 1
1983 1
1984 1
1985 1
1986 0
1987 12
1988 3
1989 0
1990 1
1991 1
1992 1
1993 9
1994 2
1995 1
1996 4
1997 4
1998 3
1999 2
2000 1
2001 11
2002 3
2003 2
2004 3
2005 7
2006 7
2007 15
2008 6
2009 3
2010 15
2011 2
2012 8
2013 19
2014 7
2015 9
2016 5
2017 14
2018 5
2019 5
2020 8
2021 9
2022 4
2023 1
2024 9
2025 2
Total 230
Download as CSV

Margaret Stroebe publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret Stroebe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 222 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283 222
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Margaret Stroebe D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret Stroebe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169 75
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Margaret Stroebe is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands and specializes in the field of Psychology, with a significant focus on Clinical Psychology. Their research portfolio includes work related to Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Health, and Social Psychology.

The core topics explored in Stroebe's body of work revolve around Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health. Additional areas include Migration, Health and Trauma, Homelessness and Social Issues, Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues, Health Disparities and Outcomes, Attachment and Relationship Dynamics, and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum.

Stroebe has contributed to several peer-reviewed publications, including the following recent papers:

  • Bereavement in Times of COVID-19: A Review and Theoretical Framework, 2020, OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
  • Emotion Regulatory Strategies in Complicated Grief: A Systematic Review, 2020, Behavior Therapy
  • A systematic review of loneliness in bereavement: Current research and future directions, 2021, Current Opinion in Psychology
  • Sleep disturbances in bereavement: A systematic review, 2020, Sleep Medicine Reviews
  • Bereavement or breakup: Differences in networks of depression, 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders

Frequent publication venues for Stroebe's articles include:

  • OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
  • Behavior Therapy
  • Harvard Review of Psychiatry
  • Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
  • Current Opinion in Psychology

Collaborative relationships have been established with several researchers over time, with notable co-authors including:

  • Henk Schut
  • Maarten C. Eisma
  • Kari Dyregrov
  • Paul A. Boelen
  • Kristine Berg Titlestad

Stroebe's research addresses a broad spectrum of health-related psychological topics, with particular attention to bereavement processes and mental health outcomes. Their work contributes to the understanding of emotional regulation, grief complexities, loneliness associated with bereavement, and the psychological effects of traumatic loss.

Best Publications

  • THE DUAL PROCESS MODEL OF COPING WITH BEREAVEMENT: RATIONALE AND DESCRIPTION

    Margaret S Stroebe;Henk Schut

  • Health outcomes of bereavement.

    Margaret Stroebe;Henk Schut;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Bereavement and Health: The Psychological and Physical Consequences of Partner Loss

    Wolfgang Stroebe;Margaret S. Stroebe

  • The dual process model of coping with bereavement: a decade on.

    Margaret Stroebe;Henk Schut

  • Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care

    Margaret S. Stroebe;Robert O. Hansson;Wolfgang Stroebe;Henk Schut

  • Handbook of Bereavement: Theory, Research and Intervention

    Margaret S. Stroebe;Wolfgang Stroebe;Robert O. Hansson

  • The role of loneliness and social support in adjustment to loss: A test of attachment versus stress theory

    Wolfgang Stroebe;Margaret Stroebe;Georgios Abakoumkin;Henk Schut

  • Who suffers more? Sex differences in health risks of the widowed.

    Margaret S. Stroebe;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Broken hearts or broken bonds. Love and death in historical perspective.

    Margaret Stroebe;Mary M. Gergen;Kenneth J. Gergen;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Gender differences in adjustment to bereavement: An empirical and theoretical review.

    Margaret Stroebe;Wolfgang Stroebe;Henk Schut

  • The efficacy of bereavement interventions: Determining who benefits.

    Henk Schut;Margaret S. Stroebe;Jan van den Bout;Maaike Terheggen

  • Meaning making in the Dual Process Model of coping with bereavement

    Stroebe;H.A.W. Schut

  • The prediction of bereavement outcome: Development of an integrative risk factor framework

    Margaret Susan Stroebe;Susan Folkman;Robert O Hansson;Henk Schut

  • Attachment in Coping With Bereavement: A Theoretical Integration

    Margaret Stroebe;Henk Schut;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Handbook of bereavement research and practice: Advances in theory and intervention.

    Margaret S. Stroebe;Robert O. Hansson;Henk Schut;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Models of coping with bereavement: A review.

    Margaret S. Stroebe;Henk Schut

  • From loss to loneliness: The relationship between bereavement and depressive symptoms.

    Eiko I. Fried;Claudi Bockting;Retha Arjadi;Denny Borsboom

  • Does disclosure of emotions facilitate recovery from bereavement? Evidence from two prospective studies.

    Margaret Stroebe;Wolfgang Stroebe;Henk Schut;Emmanuelle Zech

  • Grief work, disclosure and counseling: do they help the bereaved?

    Wolfgang Stroebe;Henk Schut;Margaret S Stroebe

  • Continuing bonds in adaptation to bereavement: Toward theoretical integration

    Margaret Stroebe;Henk Schut;Kathrin Boerner

  • Bereavement and health

    Wolfgang. Stroebe;Margaret S. Stroebe

Frequent Co-Authors

Henk Schut
Henk Schut Utrecht University
Wolfgang Stroebe
Wolfgang Stroebe University of Groningen
Jan van den Bout
Jan van den Bout Utrecht University
Maarten C. Eisma
Maarten C. Eisma University of Groningen
Robert O. Hansson
Robert O. Hansson University of Tulsa
Paul A. Boelen
Paul A. Boelen Utrecht University
Kathrin Boerner
Kathrin Boerner Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Catrin Finkenauer
Catrin Finkenauer Utrecht University
Peter G. M. van der Heijden
Peter G. M. van der Heijden University of Southampton
Kenneth J. Gergen
Kenneth J. Gergen Swarthmore College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study psychology in the USA opens the door to a wide range of online degrees and diverse career pathways. Many institutions now offer flexible online programs in psychology and counseling, making it easier for students to balance learning with other commitments.

Accredited online degrees can lead to rewarding roles in mental health, education, social services, and research. There is strong demand for counselors and therapists in communities nationwide. For example, students may be interested in the popular counseling programs in New Jersey or wish to explore the top-ranked counseling degree programs in Philadelphia.

If you’re located on the West Coast, consider the best-ranked counseling degree programs in San Francisco or the growing selection of the most popular counseling degree programs in Stockton. Each program combines foundational psychological theory with opportunities for career development, clinical practice, and community engagement.

Whether you pursue an online bachelor’s or master’s degree, graduates can expect strong job prospects and the chance to make a meaningful impact in people’s lives.

Best Scientists Citing Margaret Stroebe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles