World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jan van den Bout

Jan van den Bout

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
57
Citations
10848
World Ranking
4064
National Ranking
195

Jan van den Bout publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan van den Bout sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 134 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jan van den Bout D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan van den Bout sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan van den Bout is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands.

Best Publications

  • A Cognitive-Behavioral Conceptualization of Complicated Grief.

    Paul A. Boelen;Marcel A. van den Hout;Jan van den Bout

  • Treatment of complicated grief: a comparison between cognitive-behavioral therapy and supportive counseling

    Paul A. Boelen;Jos de Keijser;Marcel A. van den Hout;Jan van den Bout

  • The efficacy of bereavement interventions: Determining who benefits.

    Henk Schut;Margaret S. Stroebe;Jan van den Bout;Maaike Terheggen

  • Does disclosure of emotions facilitate recovery from bereavement? Evidence from two prospective studies.

    Margaret Stroebe;Wolfgang Stroebe;Henk Schut;Emmanuelle Zech

  • Complicated Grief, Depression, and Anxiety as Distinct Postloss Syndromes: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis Study

    Paul A. Boelen;Jan van den Bout

  • Couples at Risk Following the Death of Their Child: Predictors of Grief Versus Depression

    Leoniek Wijngaards-de Meij;Margaret Stroebe;Henk Schut;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Initial Validation of the SLEEP-50 Questionnaire

    Victor I Spoormaker;Ingrid Verbeek;Jan van den Bout;Ed C Klip

  • Intervention for the bereaved: Gender differences in the efficacy of two counselling programmes

    H.A.W. Schut;Margaret Stroebe;J. van den Bout;de Jos Keijser

  • Traumatic Grief as a Disorder Distinct From Bereavement-Related Depression and Anxiety: A Replication Study With Bereaved Mental Health Care Patients

    Paul A. Boelen;Jan van den Bout;Jos de Keijser

  • Nightmares: from anxiety symptom to sleep disorder.

    Victor I. Spoormaker;Michael Schredl;Jan van den Bout

  • Prolonged Grief Disorder, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder are distinguishable syndromes.

    Paul A. Boelen;Rens van de Schoot;Marcel A. van den Hout;Jos de Keijser

  • Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the inventory of traumatic grief (ITG).

    Paul A Boelen;Jan Van Den Bout;Jos De Keijser;Herbert Hoijtink

  • Negative cognitions and avoidance in emotional problems after bereavement: a prospective study.

    Paul A. Boelen;Jan van den Bout;Marcel A. van den Hout

  • Internet-Based Exposure and Behavioral Activation for Complicated Grief and Rumination: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Maarten C. Eisma;Paul A. Boelen;Jan van den Bout;Wolfgang Stroebe;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Lucid dreaming treatment for nightmares: a pilot study.

    Victor I. Spoormaker;Jan van den Bout

  • Parents grieving the loss of their child: Interdependence in coping

    Leoniek Wijngaards-de Meij;Margaret Stroebe;Henk Schut;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Stability and discriminative power of the Young Schema-Questionnaire in a Dutch clinical versus non-clinical population

    Marleen M. Rijkeboer;Huub van den Bergh;Jan van den Bout

  • Avoidance processes mediate the relationship between rumination and symptoms of complicated grief and depression following loss.

    Maarten C. Eisma;Margaret S. Stroebe;Henk A. W. Schut;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Risk factors for bereavement outcome: a multivariate approach.

    Karolijne van der Houwen;Margaret Stroebe;Wolfgang Stroebe;Henk Schut

  • Complicated grief and uncomplicated grief are distinguishable constructs.

    Paul A. Boelen;Jan van den Bout

  • Adjustment to termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: a longitudinal study in women at 4, 8, and 16 months.

    Marijke J. Korenromp;Godelieve C.M.L. Page-Christiaens;Jan van den Bout;Eduard J.H. Mulder

  • On the classification and diagnosis of pathological grief

    Margaret Stroebe;Maarten van Son;Wolfgang Stroebe;Rolf Kleber

Frequent Co-Authors

Henk Schut
Henk Schut Utrecht University
Paul A. Boelen
Paul A. Boelen Utrecht University
Margaret Stroebe
Margaret Stroebe Utrecht University
Wolfgang Stroebe
Wolfgang Stroebe University of Groningen
Victor I. Spoormaker
Victor I. Spoormaker Max Planck Society
Jaap Lancee
Jaap Lancee University of Amsterdam
Maarten C. Eisma
Maarten C. Eisma University of Groningen
Marcel A. van den Hout
Marcel A. van den Hout Utrecht University
Gerard H.A. Visser
Gerard H.A. Visser Utrecht University
Peter G. M. van der Heijden
Peter G. M. van der Heijden University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up a range of rewarding career opportunities, many of which intersect with the growing need for mental health and substance abuse professionals. Online degrees in psychology or counseling have become increasingly popular, providing flexibility for students while preparing them for careers in high-demand fields.

One pathway is becoming a substance abuse counselor, a critical role in communities nationwide. While requirements vary by location, understanding how to become a substance abuse counselor in Fort Worth can provide insight into the education, practical experience, and certification needed. Similarly, researching the substance abuse counselor requirements in Fremont will help prospective students identify local licensing expectations.

Several programs highlight the benefits of online education, including details on how to become a substance abuse counselor in Fresno and how to become a substance abuse counselor in Garland. Each region may have different paths, but online degrees offer foundational knowledge and often meet core requirements for licensure, making them a strong starting point for a career in substance abuse counseling or related mental health fields.

Best Scientists Citing Jan van den Bout

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles