World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 63 3147 2899 144 141 475 13050

Michael Schredl publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Schredl between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Schredl published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 15.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2020. 45 of the 543 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2020. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 30 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 30 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 29 publications 2020: 36 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 25 publications 2025: 20 publications
1990 2025

543 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael Schredl: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 2
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 3
1996 5
1997 7
1998 10
1999 6
2000 12
2001 9
2002 8
2003 8
2004 6
2005 8
2006 13
2007 11
2008 19
2009 23
2010 30
2011 18
2012 20
2013 30
2014 28
2015 25
2016 26
2017 17
2018 29
2019 29
2020 36
2021 26
2022 19
2023 13
2024 25
2025 20
Total 543
Download as CSV

Michael Schredl publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Schredl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 471–480 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 475 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25 475
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael Schredl D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Schredl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248 63
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael Schredl is affiliated with the Central Institute of Mental Health in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on sleep and wakefulness, with a strong emphasis on sleep-related disorders, circadian rhythms, and cognitive processes associated with dreaming.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with particular involvement in cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. Additional subfields of study include clinical psychology, endocrine and autonomic systems, and social psychology.

Key topics in their research work cover:

  • Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Sleep and related disorders
  • Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Mind wandering and attention
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Human-Animal Interaction Studies

Michael Schredl has frequently published in several venues, among which the most notable include:

  • Dreaming
  • University Library Heidelberg
  • Somnologie - Schlafforschung und Schlafmedizin
  • Imagination Cognition and Personality
  • Journal of Sleep Research

Their recent papers demonstrate a sustained focus on dreaming and sleep research. Selected publications include:

  • "Dreaming and the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey in a U.S. sample." (2020), published in Dreaming
  • "Lucid Dreaming and the Feeling of Being Refreshed in the Morning: A Diary Study" (2020), published in Clocks & Sleep
  • "Differences between lucid and nonlucid dream reports: A within-subjects design." (2022), published in Dreaming

Other relevant papers co-authored by collaborators but reflecting related research themes include:

  • "Dream lucidity is associated with positive waking mood" (2020), published in Consciousness and Cognition
  • "Pre-existing sleep problems as a predictor of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19" (2023), published in Journal of Sleep Research

Frequent collaborative relationships have been established with several researchers, including:

  • Anja S. Göritz
  • Cláudia Schilling
  • Daniel Erlacher
  • Kelly Bulkeley
  • Michelle Carr

The combination of extensive publication in sleep and cognitive neuroscience fields alongside consistent collaborative engagement underscores Michael Schredl's focused research trajectory within mental health and sleep science.

Best Publications

  • Continuity between waking activities and dream activities

    Michael Schredl;Friedrich Hofmann

  • Prevalence and course of sleep problems in childhood.

    Leonie Fricke-Oerkermann;Julia Plück;Michael Schredl;Kathrin Heinz

  • Effects of state and trait factors on nightmare frequency

    Michael Schredl

  • Nightmares: from anxiety symptom to sleep disorder.

    Victor I. Spoormaker;Michael Schredl;Jan van den Bout

  • Induction of lucid dreams: a systematic review of evidence.

    Tadas Stumbrys;Daniel Erlacher;Melanie Schädlich;Michael Schredl

  • Emotions in Diary Dreams

    Michael Schredl;Evelyn Doll

  • Questionnaires and Diaries as Research Instruments in Dream Research: Methodological Issues

    Michael Schredl

  • Lucid dreaming frequency and personality

    Michael Schredl;Daniel Erlacher

  • Gender differences in nightmare frequency: A meta-analysis

    Michael Schredl;Iris Reinhard

  • Dreaming in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Critical Review of Phenomenology, Psychophysiology and Treatment

    Lutz Wittmann;Michael Schredl;Milton Kramer

  • Gender differences in dream recall: a meta-analysis.

    Michael Schredl;Iris Reinhard

  • Reliability and stability of a dream recall frequency scale.

    Michael Schredl

  • Factors of home dream recall: a structural equation model

    Michael Schredl;Lutz Wittmann;Petra Ciric;Simon GÖtz

  • Aetiology and treatment of nightmare disorder: State of the art and future perspectives

    Annika Gieselmann;Malik Ait Aoudia;Michelle Carr;Anne Germain

  • Nightmare frequency and nightmare topics in a representative German sample

    Michael Schredl

  • Sleep in Adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Before and During Treatment with Methylphenidate : A Controlled Polysomnographic Study

    Esther Sobanski;Michael Schredl;Nina Kettler;Barbara Alm

  • The Mannheim Dream questionnaire (MADRE): Retest reliability, age and gender effects

    Michael Schredl;Sabrina Berres;Anna Klingauf;Sabine Schellhaas

  • Typical Dreams: Stability and Gender Differences

    Michael Schredl;Petra Ciric;Simon GÖtz;Lutz Wittmann

  • Dreaming and insomnia: Dream recall and dream content of patients with insomnia

    Michael Schredl;Gerard Schäfer;Bettina Weber;Isabella Heuser

  • Donepezil-induced REM sleep augmentation enhances memory performance in elderly, healthy persons.

    M Schredl;B Weber;M.-L Leins;I Heuser

Frequent Co-Authors

Anja S. Göritz
Anja S. Göritz University of Freiburg
Isabella Heuser
Isabella Heuser Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Dieter Riemann
Dieter Riemann University of Freiburg
Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg
Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg Heidelberg University
Stephanie H. Witt
Stephanie H. Witt Heidelberg University
Marcella Rietschel
Marcella Rietschel Heidelberg University
Fabian Streit
Fabian Streit Heidelberg University
J. Allan Hobson
J. Allan Hobson Harvard University
Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer
Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Golo Kronenberg
Golo Kronenberg University of Leicester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens the door to a wide range of online programs and career pathways, particularly in fields like social work and counseling. Many students combine their Psychology studies with specialized social work degrees, which can lead to rewarding roles helping individuals, families, and communities.

If you’re considering a social work path, it’s important to compare options across different regions. For example, some of the top social work programs in the Northeast offer strong theoretical foundations and extensive fieldwork opportunities. Those seeking flexibility might look into the top social work degrees in Oklahoma, some of which feature high-quality online options for distance learners.

Cities with diverse populations, such as Philadelphia and Portland, are also home to standout programs. Prospective students can review the best social work degree programs in Philadelphia or the best social work degrees in Portland for specialized coursework and career networking.

With these pathways, Psychology graduates can leverage their skills in multiple sectors, including health services, education, advocacy, and public policy. Online degrees help make this progression accessible and convenient for learners nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Schredl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles