World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter G. M. van der Heijden

Peter G. M. van der Heijden

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
37
Citations
4861
World Ranking
6283
National Ranking
1020

Peter G. M. van der Heijden publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter G. M. van der Heijden sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 127 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Peter G. M. van der Heijden D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter G. M. van der Heijden sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Meta-Analysis of Randomized Response Research Thirty-Five Years of Validation

    Gerty J. L. M. Lensvelt-Mulders;Joop J. Hox;Peter G. M. van der Heijden;Cora J. M. Maas

  • Couples at Risk Following the Death of Their Child: Predictors of Grief Versus Depression

    Leoniek Wijngaards-de Meij;Margaret Stroebe;Henk Schut;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Parents grieving the loss of their child: Interdependence in coping

    Leoniek Wijngaards-de Meij;Margaret Stroebe;Henk Schut;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Patterns of Attachment and Parents' Adjustment to the Death of Their Child

    Leoniek Wijngaards-de Meij;Margaret Stroebe;Henk Schut;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • On the assessment of adverse drug reactions from spontaneous reporting systems: the influence of under-reporting on odds ratios

    Peter G M van der Heijden;Eugène P van Puijenbroek;Stef van Buuren;Jacques W van der Hofstede

  • The impact of circumstances surrounding the death of a child on parents' grief

    Leoniek Wijngaards-de Meij;Margaret Stroebe;Wolfgang Stroebe;Henk Schut

  • Item Randomized-Response Models for Measuring Noncompliance: Risk-Return Perceptions, Social Influences, and Self-Protective Responses

    Ulf Böckenholt;Peter G. M. van der Heijden

  • Randomized Response, Statistical Disclosure Control and Misclassification: a Review

    Ardo van den Hout;Peter G.M. van der Heijden

  • Point and interval estimation of the population size using the truncated Poisson regression model

    Peter Gm van der Heijden;Rami Bustami;Maarten Jlf Cruyff;Godfried Engbersen

  • How to Improve the Efficiency of Randomised Response Designs

    Gerty J. L. M. Lensvelt-Mulders;Joop J. Hox;Peter G. M. van der Heijden

  • Neuroticism and attachment insecurity as predictors of bereavement outcome

    Leoniek Wijngaards-de Meij;Margaret Stroebe;Henk Schut;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Estimating the Size of a Criminal Population from Police Records Using the Truncated Poisson Regression Model

    Peter G.M. Van Der Heijden;Maarten Cruyff;Hans C. Van Houwelingen

  • Nurse-elderly patient communication in home care and institutional care : an explorative study

    Wilma M.C.M. Caris-Verhallen;Ada Kerkstra;Peter G.M. van der Heijden;Jozien M. Bensing

  • Prevalence of use of performance enhancing drugs by fitness centre members

    Janine H. Stubbe;Astrid M. J. Chorus;Laurence E. Frank;Olivier de Hon

  • Estimating the Concomitant-Variable Latent-Class Model With the EM Algorithm:

    Peter G. M. van der Heijden;Jos Dessens;UIf Bockenholt

  • Affect dysregulation and dissociation in borderline personality disorder and somatoform disorder: differentiating inhibitory and excitatory experiencing states.

    Annemiek van Dijke;Onno van der Hart;Julian D Ford;Maarten van Son

  • A validation of a computer-assisted randomized response survey to estimate the prevalence of fraud in social security

    Gerty J. L. M. Lensvelt-Mulders;Peter G. M. van der Heijden;Olav Laudy;Ger van Gils

  • Affect dysregulation in borderline personality disorder and somatoform disorder: differentiating under- and over-regulation.

    Annemiek van Dijke;Julian D Ford;Onno van der Hart;Maarten van Son

  • Log-linear randomized-response models taking self-protective response behavior into account

    Maarten J. L. F. Cruyff;Ardo van den Hout;Peter G. M. van der Heijden;Ulf Böckenholt

  • Explaining regulatory non-compliance. A survey study of rule transgression for two Dutch instrumental laws, applying the randomized response method

    Henk Elffers;Peter van der Heijden;Merlijn Hezemans

Frequent Co-Authors

Dankmar Böhning
Dankmar Böhning University of Southampton
Ulf Böckenholt
Ulf Böckenholt Northwestern University
Rens van de Schoot
Rens van de Schoot Utrecht University
Anna Thorson
Anna Thorson Karolinska Institute
Wolfgang Stroebe
Wolfgang Stroebe University of Groningen
Henk Schut
Henk Schut Utrecht University
Julian D. Ford
Julian D. Ford University of Connecticut
Onno van der Hart
Onno van der Hart Utrecht University
Jan van den Bout
Jan van den Bout Utrecht University
Margaret Stroebe
Margaret Stroebe Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The fields of Social Sciences and Humanities offer diverse career opportunities through flexible online programs in the USA. Many students choose accelerated msw online programs to quickly earn a Master of Social Work, preparing them for impactful roles in social services and community outreach.

For those passionate about mental health and human behavior, pursuing an accelerated bachelor's in psychology can jump-start a range of careers, including counseling, research, or organizational psychology.

Counseling remains a vital area. Students seeking budget-friendly options can explore the cheapest online school counseling programs (cacrep-accredited), which meet high accreditation standards and prepare graduates for licensure and work in school settings.

Interested in supporting families and couples? Earning a marriage and family therapist degree online offers a specialized pathway to make a difference in relationship dynamics and family wellness.

These online degrees provide flexibility, affordability, and clear pathways to rewarding careers in social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Peter G. M. van der Heijden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles