World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter G. M. van der Heijden

Peter G. M. van der Heijden

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 37 6283 5839 1020 949 127 4861

Peter G. M. van der Heijden publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter G. M. van der Heijden between 1985 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter G. M. van der Heijden published across 37 years, from 1985 to 2021, averaging 4.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2015. 13 of the 153 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2015. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 4 publications
1985 2021

153 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter G. M. van der Heijden: publications per year, 1985 to 2021
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 1
1988 2
1989 2
1990 2
1991 1
1992 4
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 2
1997 2
1998 3
1999 1
2000 2
2001 2
2002 6
2003 5
2004 3
2005 5
2006 2
2007 7
2008 8
2009 4
2010 5
2011 4
2012 5
2013 9
2014 8
2015 11
2016 5
2017 8
2018 9
2019 9
2020 9
2021 4
Total 153
Download as CSV

Peter G. M. van der Heijden publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter G. M. van der Heijden sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 127 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 127
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter G. M. van der Heijden D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter G. M. van der Heijden sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272 37
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Meta-Analysis of Randomized Response Research Thirty-Five Years of Validation

    Gerty J. L. M. Lensvelt-Mulders;Joop J. Hox;Peter G. M. van der Heijden;Cora J. M. Maas

  • Couples at Risk Following the Death of Their Child: Predictors of Grief Versus Depression

    Leoniek Wijngaards-de Meij;Margaret Stroebe;Henk Schut;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Parents grieving the loss of their child: Interdependence in coping

    Leoniek Wijngaards-de Meij;Margaret Stroebe;Henk Schut;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Patterns of Attachment and Parents' Adjustment to the Death of Their Child

    Leoniek Wijngaards-de Meij;Margaret Stroebe;Henk Schut;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • On the assessment of adverse drug reactions from spontaneous reporting systems: the influence of under-reporting on odds ratios

    Peter G M van der Heijden;Eugène P van Puijenbroek;Stef van Buuren;Jacques W van der Hofstede

  • The impact of circumstances surrounding the death of a child on parents' grief

    Leoniek Wijngaards-de Meij;Margaret Stroebe;Wolfgang Stroebe;Henk Schut

  • Item Randomized-Response Models for Measuring Noncompliance: Risk-Return Perceptions, Social Influences, and Self-Protective Responses

    Ulf Böckenholt;Peter G. M. van der Heijden

  • Randomized Response, Statistical Disclosure Control and Misclassification: a Review

    Ardo van den Hout;Peter G.M. van der Heijden

  • Point and interval estimation of the population size using the truncated Poisson regression model

    Peter Gm van der Heijden;Rami Bustami;Maarten Jlf Cruyff;Godfried Engbersen

  • How to Improve the Efficiency of Randomised Response Designs

    Gerty J. L. M. Lensvelt-Mulders;Joop J. Hox;Peter G. M. van der Heijden

  • Neuroticism and attachment insecurity as predictors of bereavement outcome

    Leoniek Wijngaards-de Meij;Margaret Stroebe;Henk Schut;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Estimating the Size of a Criminal Population from Police Records Using the Truncated Poisson Regression Model

    Peter G.M. Van Der Heijden;Maarten Cruyff;Hans C. Van Houwelingen

  • Nurse-elderly patient communication in home care and institutional care : an explorative study

    Wilma M.C.M. Caris-Verhallen;Ada Kerkstra;Peter G.M. van der Heijden;Jozien M. Bensing

  • Prevalence of use of performance enhancing drugs by fitness centre members

    Janine H. Stubbe;Astrid M. J. Chorus;Laurence E. Frank;Olivier de Hon

  • Estimating the Concomitant-Variable Latent-Class Model With the EM Algorithm:

    Peter G. M. van der Heijden;Jos Dessens;UIf Bockenholt

  • Affect dysregulation and dissociation in borderline personality disorder and somatoform disorder: differentiating inhibitory and excitatory experiencing states.

    Annemiek van Dijke;Onno van der Hart;Julian D Ford;Maarten van Son

  • A validation of a computer-assisted randomized response survey to estimate the prevalence of fraud in social security

    Gerty J. L. M. Lensvelt-Mulders;Peter G. M. van der Heijden;Olav Laudy;Ger van Gils

  • Affect dysregulation in borderline personality disorder and somatoform disorder: differentiating under- and over-regulation.

    Annemiek van Dijke;Julian D Ford;Onno van der Hart;Maarten van Son

  • Log-linear randomized-response models taking self-protective response behavior into account

    Maarten J. L. F. Cruyff;Ardo van den Hout;Peter G. M. van der Heijden;Ulf Böckenholt

  • Explaining regulatory non-compliance. A survey study of rule transgression for two Dutch instrumental laws, applying the randomized response method

    Henk Elffers;Peter van der Heijden;Merlijn Hezemans

Frequent Co-Authors

Dankmar Böhning
Dankmar Böhning University of Southampton
Ulf Böckenholt
Ulf Böckenholt Northwestern University
Rens van de Schoot
Rens van de Schoot Utrecht University
Anna Thorson
Anna Thorson Karolinska Institute
Wolfgang Stroebe
Wolfgang Stroebe University of Groningen
Henk Schut
Henk Schut Utrecht University
Julian D. Ford
Julian D. Ford University of Connecticut
Onno van der Hart
Onno van der Hart Utrecht University
Jan van den Bout
Jan van den Bout Utrecht University
Margaret Stroebe
Margaret Stroebe Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The fields of Social Sciences and Humanities offer diverse career opportunities through flexible online programs in the USA. Many students choose accelerated msw online programs to quickly earn a Master of Social Work, preparing them for impactful roles in social services and community outreach.

For those passionate about mental health and human behavior, pursuing an accelerated bachelor's in psychology can jump-start a range of careers, including counseling, research, or organizational psychology.

Counseling remains a vital area. Students seeking budget-friendly options can explore the cheapest online school counseling programs (cacrep-accredited), which meet high accreditation standards and prepare graduates for licensure and work in school settings.

Interested in supporting families and couples? Earning a marriage and family therapist degree online offers a specialized pathway to make a difference in relationship dynamics and family wellness.

These online degrees provide flexibility, affordability, and clear pathways to rewarding careers in social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Peter G. M. van der Heijden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles