World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
12488
World Ranking
3711
National Ranking
183

Rinie Geenen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rinie Geenen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 288 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Rinie Geenen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rinie Geenen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rinie Geenen is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research encompasses medicine and psychology, with particular focus on psychiatry and mental health, clinical psychology, rheumatology, pharmacology, and physiology. The scientist has made substantial contributions to the study of fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, psychosomatic disorders, musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, pain management and placebo effects, optimism and well-being, as well as eating disorders and behaviors.

Geenen's recent publications include:

  • EULAR definition of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis, 2020, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • EULAR points to consider for the management of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis, 2021, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • 2022 EULAR points to consider for remote care in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases, 2022, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • Emotion regulation and the salience network: a hypothetical integrative model of fibromyalgia, 2022, Nature Reviews Rheumatology
  • Neurophysiological and psychosocial mechanisms of fibromyalgia: A comprehensive review and call for an integrative model, 2023, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Frequent co-authors in Geenen's research include:

  • Ana Margarida Pinto
  • José António Pereira da Silva
  • Johannes W. G. Jacobs
  • Paula Castilho
  • Tim Y. Koppert

Geenen has published extensively in venues such as:

  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research
  • Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
  • Nature Reviews Rheumatology
  • RMD Open

In addition to journal publications, Geenen has contributed to book literature, notably with publication by the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences titled Targeting fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis (2020).

Best Publications

  • EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee osteoarthritis

    Linda Fernandes;Kåre B Hagen;Johannes W J Bijlsma;Oyvor Andreassen

  • Psychological adjustment to chronic disease.

    Denise de Ridder;Rinie Geenen;Roeline Kuijer;Henriët van Middendorp

  • Development and validation of a Dutch translation of the Big Five Inventory (BFI).

    Jaap J A Denissen;Rinie Geenen;Marcel A G van Aken;Samuel D Gosling

  • Pain coping and social support as predictors of long-term functional disability and pain in early rheumatoid arthritis.

    Andrea W.M Evers;Floris W Kraaimaat;Rinie Geenen;Johannes W.G Jacobs

  • EULAR recommendations for the health professional's approach to pain management in inflammatory arthritis and osteoarthritis

    Rinie Geenen;Cécile L Overman;Robin Christensen;Pernilla Åsenlöf

  • Emotions and emotional approach and avoidance strategies in fibromyalgia.

    Henriët van Middendorp;Mark A. Lumley;Johannes W.G. Jacobs;Lorenz J.P. van Doornen

  • Peer influence on snacking behavior in adolescence.

    Eveline J. Wouters;Junilla K. Larsen;Stef P. Kremers;Pieter C. Dagnelie

  • Understanding the lack of understanding: Invalidation from the perspective of the patient with fibromyalgia

    Marianne B. Kool;Henriët van Middendorp;Hennie R. Boeije;Rinie Geenen

  • Psychosocial predictors of functional change in recently diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis patients

    Andrea W.M. Evers;Floris W. Kraaimaat;Rinie Geenen;Johannes W.J. Bijlsma

  • Determinants of psychological distress and its course in the first year after diagnosis in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

    A.W.M. Evers;F.W. Kraaimaat;R. Geenen;J.W.J. Bijlsma

  • Lack of understanding in fibromyalgia and rheumatoid arthritis: the Illness Invalidation Inventory (3*I)

    M B Kool;H van Middendorp;M A Lumley;Y Schenk

  • Effect of dehydroepiandrosterone administration on fatigue, well-being, and functioning in women with primary Sjögren syndrome: a randomised controlled trial

    A. Hartkamp;R. Geenen;G. L. R. Godaert;Hendrika Bootsma

  • Emotion Regulation in Adolescence: A Prospective Study of Expressive Suppression and Depressive Symptoms

    Junilla K. Larsen;Ad A. Vermulst;Rinie Geenen;Henriët van Middendorp

  • Effectiveness of psychotherapy for severe somatoform disorder: meta-analysis

    Jurrijn A. Koelen;Jan H. Houtveen;Allan Abbass;Patrick Luyten

  • Cardiovascular and immune responses to acute psychological stress in young and old women: a meta-analysis.

    Robert J. Benschop;Rinie Geenen;Paul J. Mills;Bruce D. Naliboff

  • The effect of cognitive behavior therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

    F.W. Kraaimaat;M.R. Brons;R. Geenen;J.W.J. Bijlsma

  • Single‐item big five ratings in a social network design

    Jaap J. A. Denissen;Rinie Geenen;Maarten Selfhout;Marcel A. G. Van Aken

  • Longterm predictors of anxiety and depressed mood in early rheumatoid arthritis: a 3 and 5 year followup.

    Andrea W M Evers;Floris W Kraaimaat;Rinie Geenen;Johannes W G Jacobs

  • Binge Eating and its Relationship to Outcome after Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding

    Junilla K Larsen;Bert van Ramshorst;Rinie Geenen;Nico Brand

  • Loneliness in patients with rheumatic diseases: the significance of invalidation and lack of social support

    Marianne B. Kool;Rinie Geenen

Frequent Co-Authors

Johannes W. J. Bijlsma
Johannes W. J. Bijlsma Utrecht University
Junilla K. Larsen
Junilla K. Larsen Radboud University
Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets
Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets Tilburg University
Mark A. Lumley
Mark A. Lumley Wayne State University
Hendrika Bootsma
Hendrika Bootsma University Medical Center Groningen
Andrea W M Evers
Andrea W M Evers Leiden University
Rens van de Schoot
Rens van de Schoot Utrecht University
Gary J. Macfarlane
Gary J. Macfarlane University of Aberdeen
Floris W. Kraaimaat
Floris W. Kraaimaat Radboud University
Joost Dekker
Joost Dekker University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology programs in the USA opens up a variety of flexible learning and diverse career pathways. For those wanting to quickly advance or kickstart a career, the quickest human services online degree programs offer accelerated options to enter fields supporting mental health, counseling, and social work.

If you’re passionate about sports and human behavior, there are rewarding sports psychology careers available. Roles in this field focus on athlete motivation, team dynamics, and performance enhancement across all levels of sports organizations.

Graduates wondering what to do with masters in psychology will discover opportunities in counseling, organizational psychology, research, human resources, and more. This credential offers versatility and access to both clinical and non-clinical roles.

The field of forensic psychology is also growing. Students may ask what kind of jobs can you get with a masters degree in forensic psychology. Potential roles include victim advocacy, correctional counseling, criminal profiling, and consulting with law enforcement.

Online degrees and specialized training let you tailor your education to align with your career goals, supporting a flexible, impactful future in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Rinie Geenen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles