World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets

Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
73
Citations
17828
World Ranking
1980
National Ranking
112

Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 401 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Social psychology
  • Psychiatry

His scientific interests lie mostly in Social psychology, Developmental psychology, Psychosocial, Quality of life and Breast cancer. His research on Social psychology frequently connects to adjacent areas such as Well-being. His Developmental psychology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Stressor, Facial expression, Personality, Cross-cultural studies and Crying.

His Psychosocial research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Confidence interval, Low birth weight, Clinical psychology, Obstetrics and Social support. His Quality of life research integrates issues from Cancer registry, Gynecology and Gerontology. His Breast cancer research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Surgery and Disease.

His most cited work include:

  • Quality of life among long-term breast cancer survivors: A systematic review (419 citations)
  • Psychosocial factors and pregnancy outcome: A review with emphasis on methodological issues☆ (320 citations)
  • Quality of life assessment (294 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Developmental psychology, Crying, Clinical psychology, Social psychology and Personality. He combines subjects such as Distress, Social support, Mood, Coping and Feeling with his study of Developmental psychology. Social support and Psychosocial are frequently intertwined in his study.

His Crying study incorporates themes from Tears, Affect, Perception and Interpersonal communication. His Social psychology study frequently links to other fields, such as Well-being. His study in Extraversion and introversion and Neuroticism falls under the purview of Personality.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Developmental psychology (32.18%)
  • Crying (24.47%)
  • Clinical psychology (14.10%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?

  • Crying (24.47%)
  • Developmental psychology (32.18%)
  • Tears (6.65%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Crying, Developmental psychology, Tears, Social psychology and Clinical psychology. His Crying study also includes fields such as

  • Perception that connect with fields like Anger,
  • Affect which connect with Personality and Distress. His research in Developmental psychology focuses on subjects like Feeling, which are connected to Social support.

His Tears study combines topics in areas such as Young adult and Functional magnetic resonance imaging. His Social psychology research focuses on Active listening and how it connects with Extraversion and introversion and Neuroticism. In his work, Anxiety is strongly intertwined with Mental health, which is a subfield of Clinical psychology.

Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Nostalgia fosters self-continuity: Uncovering the mechanism (social connectedness) and consequence (eudaimonic well-being). (66 citations)
  • The riddle of human emotional crying : A challenge for emotion researchers (52 citations)
  • Effectiveness of hospital-based video interaction guidance on parental interactive behavior, bonding, and stress after preterm birth: A randomized controlled trial. (36 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Social psychology
  • Psychiatry

His primary areas of study are Developmental psychology, Crying, Social psychology, Feeling and Tears. His work on Intrusiveness as part of his general Developmental psychology study is frequently connected to Child health, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science. His study in Crying is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Distress, Prosocial behavior and Mood.

His study in the fields of Social connectedness, Sadness, Personality and Empathy under the domain of Social psychology overlaps with other disciplines such as Music and emotion. His Feeling research incorporates themes from Gestational age, Parental bonding, Emotional Bonds, Infant newborn and Emotional bonding. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Longitudinal study, Well-being is strongly linked to Clinical psychology.

Best Publications

  • Quality of life among long-term breast cancer survivors: A systematic review

    Floortje Mols;Ad J.J.M. Vingerhoets;Jan Willem Coebergh;Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse

  • The past makes the present meaningful: nostalgia as an existential resource.

    Clay Routledge;Jamie Arndt;Tim Wildschut;Constantine Sedikides

  • Psychological aspects of in vitro fertilization: a review.

    A Eugster;A.J.J.M Vingerhoets

  • Psychosocial factors and pregnancy outcome: A review with emphasis on methodological issues☆

    K.Marieke Paarlberg;AD J.J.M. Vingerhoets;Jan Passchier;Gustaaf A. Dekker

  • Attachment and well-being: The mediating role of emotion regulation and resilience.

    Annemiek Karreman;Ad J.J.M. Vingerhoets

  • Back to the Future: Nostalgia Increases Optimism

    Wing-Yee Cheung;Tim Wildschut;Constantine Sedikides;Erica G. Hepper

  • Spirituality and well-being in cancer patients: A review

    Anja Visser;Bert Garssen;Ad Vingerhoets

  • The Patient Reported Outcomes Following Initial treatment and Long term Evaluation of Survivorship registry: Scope, rationale and design of an infrastructure for the study of physical and psychosocial outcomes in cancer survivorship cohorts

    Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse;Nicole Horevoorts;Mies van Eenbergen;Johan Denollet

  • Vacationers Happier, but Most not Happier After a Holiday.

    Jeroen Nawijn;Jeroen Nawijn;Miquelle A. Marchand;Ruut Veenhoven;Ad J. Vingerhoets

  • Well-being, posttraumatic growth and benefit finding in long-term breast cancer survivors

    Floortje Mols;Ad J J M Vingerhoets;Jan Willem W Coebergh;Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse

  • Gender, coping and psychosomatic symptoms

    A. J. J. M. Vingerhoets;G. L. Van Heck

  • Psychosocial predictors of low birthweight: a prospective study.

    K.M. Paarlberg;A.J.J.M. Vingerhoets;J. Passchier;G.A. Dekker

  • Pancultural Nostalgia: Prototypical Conceptions Across Cultures

    Erica G. Hepper;Tim Wildschut;Constantine Sedikides;Timothy D. Ritchie

  • Risk, severity and predictors of physical and psychological morbidity after axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer.

    J.M.M.A Ververs;R.M.H Roumen;A.J.J.M Vingerhoets;G Vreugdenhil

  • Nostalgia fosters self-continuity: Uncovering the mechanism (social connectedness) and consequence (eudaimonic well-being).

    Constantine Sedikides;Tim Wildschut;Wing-Yee Cheung;Clay Routledge

  • Homesickness: a review of the literature.

    M. A. L. Van Tilburg;A. J. J. M. Vingerhoets;G. L. Van Heck

  • The mnemonic mover: nostalgia regulates avoidance and approach motivation.

    Elena Stephan;Tim Wildschut;Constantine Sedikides;Xinyue Zhou

  • Heartwarming memories: Nostalgia maintains physiological comfort.

    Xinyue Zhou;Tim Wildschut;Constantine Sedikides;Xiaoxi Chen

  • Adult crying : A model and review of the literature

    Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets;Randolph R. Cornelius;Guus L. Van Heck;Marleen C. Becht

  • Stress and outcome success in IVF: the role of self-reports and endocrine variables

    J.M.J. Smeenk;C.M. Verhaak;A.J.J.M. Vingerhoets;C.G.J. Sweep

  • Emotion regulation and well-being

    Ivan Nyklíček;A. J. J. M. Vingerhoets;Marcel Zeelenberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Ivan Nyklíček
Ivan Nyklíček Tilburg University
Guus L. Van Heck
Guus L. Van Heck Tilburg University
Lauren M. Bylsma
Lauren M. Bylsma University of Pittsburgh
Tim Wildschut
Tim Wildschut University of Southampton
Constantine Sedikides
Constantine Sedikides University of Southampton
Rinie Geenen
Rinie Geenen Utrecht University
Emiel Krahmer
Emiel Krahmer Tilburg University
Johan Denollet
Johan Denollet Tilburg University
Jan Willem Coebergh
Jan Willem Coebergh Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jan Passchier
Jan Passchier Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study psychology in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of online degrees and professional opportunities. With the rising demand for mental health professionals, online psychology degrees have become popular options for students looking for flexibility and career advancement.

One of the most common career pathways is becoming a licensed therapist. However, licensure requirements can vary by location. For example, if you are interested in becoming a licensed therapist in Dallas, you must complete specific educational and supervised experience requirements. Similarly, licensed therapist requirements in Denver include passing state-approved exams and obtaining a graduate-level counseling degree.

Those focusing on becoming a licensed therapist in Detroit or becoming a licensed therapist in Durham should also be aware of local regulations regarding clinical experience and state licensure exams. Researching each state’s specific pathway to licensure ensures you meet all requirements and can smoothly transition from student to professional in your chosen area.

Best Scientists Citing Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles