World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
61
Citations
10456
World Ranking
3447
National Ranking
179

Neuroscience

D-Index
61
Citations
10547
World Ranking
3735
National Ranking
100

Michael M. Saling publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael M. Saling sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 219 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael M. Saling D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael M. Saling sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael M. Saling is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia and conducts research primarily in the fields of Medicine, Neuroscience, and Psychology. Their body of work spans several key subfields, including Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Emergency Medicine, and Neurology.

The scientist's research focuses on diverse topics such as Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Language Development and Disorders, Epilepsy Research and Treatment, Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation, Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances, as well as Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research.

Recent publications include:

  • Frequency and extent of cognitive complaint following adult civilian mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2022, Brain Impairment
  • Cerebral Arterial Asymmetries in the Neonate: Insight into the Pathogenesis of Stroke, 2022, Symmetry
  • Psychological distress and gender predict cognitive complaint after adult civilian mild traumatic brain injury in pre-morbidly healthy adults, 2023, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
  • Verbal memory in children with temporal lobe epilepsy: Exploring task-specificity, 2020, Epilepsy & Behavior
  • Macrolinguistic function in temporal lobe epilepsy: a reinterpretation of circumstantiality, 2022, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Michael M. Saling has frequently published in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Symmetry
  • Brain Impairment
  • Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
  • Epilepsy & Behavior

Key collaborators include:

  • Fiore D'Aprano
  • Charles B. Malpas
  • Stefanie Roberts
  • Arielle M. Levy
  • Jacqueline F. I. Anderson

Their research often addresses clinical and cognitive aspects of neurological conditions, including epilepsy and mild traumatic brain injury, emphasizing language function, memory, and cognitive complaints following injury or illness. This work integrates neurobiological and psychological perspectives across developmental and adult populations to explore mechanisms underlying neurological and cognitive disorders.

Best Publications

  • The assessment of orientation following concussion in athletes

    David L. Maddocks;Garth D. Dicker;Michael M. Saling

  • Verbal memory in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: beyond material specificity.

    Michael M Saling

  • Functional connectivity networks are disrupted in left temporal lobe epilepsy

    Anthony B. Waites;Regula S. Briellmann;Michael M. Saling;David F. Abbott

  • Paired associate performance in the early detection of DAT.

    Kylie S. Fowler;Michael M. Saling;Elizabeth L. Conway;James M. Semple

  • The 18F-FDG PET cingulate island sign and comparison to 123I-beta-CIT SPECT for diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies.

    Seok Ming Lim;Andrew Katsifis;Victor L Villemagne;Rene Best

  • Lateralization of verbal memory and unilateral hippocampal sclerosis: Evidence of task-specific effects

    Michael M. Saling;Samuel F. Berkovic;Marie F. O'shea;Renate M. Kalnins

  • Fluctuating cognition in dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer’s disease is qualitatively distinct

    J Bradshaw;M Saling;M Hopwood;V Anderson

  • Anterior temporal abnormality in temporal lobe epilepsy A quantitative MRI and histopathologic study

    L.A. Mitchell;G.D. Jackson;R.M. Kalnins;M.M. Saling

  • On psychoanalysis and neuroscience: Freud's attitude to the localizationist tradition.

    Mark Solms;Michael Saling

  • The “burden of normality”: concepts of adjustment after surgery for seizures

    S Wilson;P Bladin;M Saling

  • Factors affecting subjective memory complaints in the AIBL aging study: biomarkers, memory, affect, and age.

    R. Buckley;M.M. Saling;D.J. Ames;C.C. Rowe

  • Pattern and significance of cerebral microemboli during coronary artery bypass grafting

    Stephen Sylivris;Christopher Levi;George Matalanis;Alexander Rosalion

  • Increased risk of cognitive impairment 3 months after mild to moderate first-ever stroke: a Community-Based Prospective Study of Nonaphasic English-Speaking Survivors.

    Velandai K. Srikanth;Amanda G. Thrift;Michael M. Saling;Jacqueline F.I. Anderson

  • The stroke syndrome of striatocapsular infarction.

    Geoffrey A. Donnan;Peter F. Bladin;Samuel F. Berkovic;Wendy A. Longley

  • Neurological control of human sexual behaviour: insights from lesion studies

    Amee Dylan Baird;Sarah J Wilson;Peter F Bladin;Michael Saling

  • Autosomal dominant rolandic epilepsy and speech dyspraxia: a new syndrome with anticipation.

    Ingrid E Scheffer;L Jones;M Pozzebon;R A Howell

  • Visual and Quantitative Analysis of Interictal SPECT with Technetium-99m-HMPAO in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

    Christopher C Rowe;Samuel F Berkovic;M C Austin;Michael M Saling

  • Cognitive side effects of brief pulse electroconvulsive therapy: a review.

    Anna Ingram;Michael M Saling;Isaac Schweitzer

  • Neuropsychological deficits following concussion

    David Maddocks;Michael Saling

  • A high-field functional MRI study of quadri-lingual subjects.

    Regula S Briellmann;Michael M Saling;Ailie B Connell;Anthony B Waites

Frequent Co-Authors

Graeme D. Jackson
Graeme D. Jackson Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Samuel F. Berkovic
Samuel F. Berkovic University of Melbourne
David Ames
David Ames University of Melbourne
Peter F. Bladin
Peter F. Bladin University of Melbourne
Sarah J. Wilson
Sarah J. Wilson University of Melbourne
Geoffrey A. Donnan
Geoffrey A. Donnan University of Melbourne
David F. Abbott
David F. Abbott University of Melbourne
David C. Reutens
David C. Reutens University of Queensland
Dennis Velakoulis
Dennis Velakoulis University of Melbourne
Amanda G. Thrift
Amanda G. Thrift Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens up a wide array of career opportunities, particularly in areas of mental health and counseling. Many students are drawn to roles such as substance abuse counselor, where there is increasing demand across the United States. These careers not only require a solid educational background but also a nuanced understanding of state-specific licensing and certification requirements.

For example, if you are interested in becoming a counselor in Nevada, review the Henderson substance abuse counselors education requirements to understand the necessary steps. Those planning to work in Hawaii will benefit from information on how to become a substance abuse counselor in Honolulu.

Students considering Texas should familiarize themselves with the Houston substance abuse counselors education requirements, while those focused on Alabama can learn more about becoming a substance abuse counselor in Huntsville.

Flexible online psychology degrees provide a strong foundation for these career pathways—and can help meet the diverse requirements found in each state. Researching individual state guidelines is essential for those planning a future in counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Michael M. Saling

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles