World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Guus L. Van Heck

Guus L. Van Heck

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
8320
World Ranking
7819
National Ranking
352

Guus L. Van Heck publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guus L. Van Heck sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 111 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Guus L. Van Heck D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guus L. Van Heck sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Guus L. Van Heck is affiliated with Tilburg University in the Netherlands. Their academic profile reflects an engagement primarily with this institution, which serves as the base for their research activities and academic contributions.

Although specific details on recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues are not documented here, Guus L. Van Heck's career is established within the academic environment of Tilburg University, a known center for various fields of study. The absence of listed publications and collaborations suggests a profile focused either on emerging research or on roles beyond extensive publication, such as teaching or administrative responsibilities.

Similarly, there is no information available regarding book publications or awards, which indicates either an early stage in their academic career or a research focus that has not resulted in recognized accolades or monographs so far.

No specific research fields, subfields, or main topics have been detailed in the current data. This lack of field-specific information may reflect a multidisciplinary approach not captured in standard metadata or a focus on less well-documented research areas.

Best Publications

  • Psychometric qualities of a brief self-rated fatigue measure: The Fatigue Assessment Scale.

    Helen J Michielsen;Jolanda De Vries;Guus L Van Heck

  • Smile attractiveness. Self-perception and influence on personality.

    Pieter Van der Geld;Paul Oosterveld;Guus Van Heck;Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman

  • Relations between negative affect, coping, and emotional eating

    Sonja T.P. Spoor;Marrie H.J. Bekker;Tatjana Van Strien;Guus L. van Heck

  • Psychosocial Predictors of Success following Bariatric Surgery

    Gerbrand C M van Hout;Saskia K M Verschure;Guus L Van Heck

  • Measuring fatigue in sarcoidosis: the Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS).

    Jolanda de Vries;Helen Michielsen;Guus L. Van Heck;Marjolein Drent

  • Examination of the dimensionality of fatigue: The construction of the Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS)

    Helen J. Michielsen;Jolanda De Vries;Guus L. Van Heck;Fons J.R. Van de Vijver

  • Content validity, construct validity, and reliability of the WHOQOL-Bref in a population of Dutch adult psychiatric outpatients

    Fons J. Trompenaars;Erik D. Masthoff;Guus L. Van Heck;Paul P. Hodiamont

  • Psychosocial functioning following bariatric surgery.

    Gerbrand C M van Hout;Petra Boekestein;Frederiek A M Fortuin;Aline J M Pelle

  • Quality of life and related concepts in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review.

    Brenda L. Den Oudsten;Guus L. Van Heck;Jolanda De Vries

  • Adult crying : A model and review of the literature

    Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets;Randolph R. Cornelius;Guus L. Van Heck;Marleen C. Becht

  • Psychological Profile of the Morbidly Obese

    Gerbrand C M van Hout;Irina van Oudheusden;Guus L van Heck

  • Relations between dietary restraint, depressive symptoms, and binge eating: A longitudinal study.

    Sonja T.P. Spoor;Eric Stice;Marrie H.J. Bekker;Tatjana Van Strien

  • Prediction of depression in the postpartum period: a longitudinal follow-up study in high-risk and low-risk women

    Gerda J.M Verkerk;Victor J.M Pop;Maarten J.M Van Son;Guus L Van Heck

  • The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Instrument (WHOQOL-100): Validation Study with the Dutch Version

    Jolanda De Vries;Guus L. Van Heck

  • Predictors of depressive symptoms 12 months after surgical treatment of early-stage breast cancer

    Brenda L. Den Oudsten;Guus L. Van Heck;Alida F. W. Van der Steeg;Jan A. Roukema

  • Psychological risk factors in heart disease what type D personality is (not) about

    Johan Denollet;Guus L Van Heck

  • Personality factors as determinants of depression in postpartum women: a prospective 1-year follow-up study.

    Gerda J. M. Verkerk;Johan Denollet;Guus L. Van Heck;Maarten J. M. Van Son

  • Fatigue: relationships with basic personality and temperament dimensions

    Jolanda De Vries;Guus L Van Heck

  • Psychosocial Predictors of Success After Vertical Banded Gastroplasty

    Gerbrand C. M. van Hout;Christine A. J. M. Hagendoren;Saskia K. M. Verschure;Guus L. van Heck

  • Bariatric psychology, psychological aspects of weight loss surgery

    Gerbrand van Hout;Guus van Heck

  • Personality and physical health: toward an ecological approach to health‐related personality research

    Guus L. Van Heck

Frequent Co-Authors

Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets
Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets Tilburg University
Giovanni A. Fava
Giovanni A. Fava University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Johan Denollet
Johan Denollet Tilburg University
Ivan Nyklíček
Ivan Nyklíček Tilburg University
Tatjana van Strien
Tatjana van Strien Radboud University
Brunna Tuschen-Caffier
Brunna Tuschen-Caffier University of Freiburg
Claus Buddeberg
Claus Buddeberg University of Zurich
Paolo Scocco
Paolo Scocco University of Padua
Winfried Rief
Winfried Rief Philipp University of Marburg
Ellen Frank
Ellen Frank University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring degree options in psychology often leads students to consider specialized areas like counseling. There are many pathways to pursue, from in-person programs to flexible online degrees that fit busy schedules.

If you’re searching for standout programs, you might want to review the best college counseling programs in Washington, D.C. or compare rankings across broader regions, such as the best counseling program rankings in the West.

For students considering Wisconsin, the top counseling degree programs in Wisconsin offer a variety of accredited options—including those that meet state licensure requirements. Meanwhile, those seeking schedule flexibility can consider the rapidly growing online counseling degrees in California.

Each pathway—whether in-person or online—offers unique advantages, from networking opportunities to tailored expertise for licensure and certification. Carefully comparing programs and regional requirements can help set you on a rewarding career in psychology or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Guus L. Van Heck

Recently Published Articles