World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Graeme J. Taylor

Graeme J. Taylor

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 73 1916 1731 103 91 178 38836

Graeme J. Taylor publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Graeme J. Taylor between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Graeme J. Taylor published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 1997. 6 of the 184 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 1997. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 4 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 14 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 6 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications
1972 2025

184 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Graeme J. Taylor: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 1
1975 1
1976 0
1977 3
1978 2
1979 2
1980 0
1981 4
1982 3
1983 1
1984 3
1985 3
1986 4
1987 1
1988 4
1989 4
1990 4
1991 5
1992 6
1993 8
1994 4
1995 3
1996 4
1997 14
1998 7
1999 3
2000 5
2001 3
2002 2
2003 5
2004 4
2005 0
2006 2
2007 4
2008 4
2009 2
2010 7
2011 3
2012 1
2013 6
2014 4
2015 1
2016 5
2017 3
2018 7
2019 5
2020 2
2021 5
2022 1
2023 2
2024 2
2025 4
Total 184
Download as CSV

Graeme J. Taylor publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graeme J. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 178 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 178
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Graeme J. Taylor D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graeme J. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183 73
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Graeme J. Taylor is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and specializes primarily in the fields of psychology and medicine. Their research contributions span across several subfields including psychiatry and mental health, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, and political science and international relations.

Taylor's main research topics focus on psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, cognitive processes, psychotherapy techniques and applications, personality disorders and psychopathology, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, as well as resilience and mental health.

Their published work includes multiple papers, notable among them:

  • "Twenty-five years with the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale," 2020, Journal of Psychosomatic Research
  • "Examining Proposed Changes to the Conceptualization of the Alexithymia Construct: The Way Forward Tilts to the Past," 2020, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
  • "A bifactor analysis of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: Further support for a general alexithymia factor," 2021, Psychological Assessment
  • "Development and psychometric evaluation of an informant form of the 20-item Toronto alexithymia scale," 2020, Journal of Psychosomatic Research
  • "Examining the Incremental Validity of the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire (PAQ) Relative to the 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20)," 2023, Journal of Personality Assessment

Taylor frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including:

  • R. Michael Bagby
  • James D. A. Parker
  • Ardeshir Mortezaei
  • Sharlane C. L. Lau

Most of their publications appear in venues such as Psychodynamic Psychiatry, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Journal of Personality Assessment, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, and Psychological Assessment.

Best Publications

  • The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale--I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure.

    R.Michael Bagby;James D.A. Parker;Graeme J. Taylor

  • Disorders of Affect Regulation: Alexithymia in Medical and Psychiatric Illness

    Graeme J. Taylor;R. Michael Bagby;James D. A. Parker;James Grotstein

  • The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia scale—II. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity

    R.Michael Bagby;Graeme J. Taylor;James D.A. Parker

  • Toward the Development of a New Self-Report Alexithymia Scale

    G J Taylor;D Ryan;R M Bagby

  • Alexithymia: Concept, measurement, and implications for treatment.

    Graeme J. Taylor

  • The Alexithymia Construct: A Potential Paradigm for Psychosomatic Medicine

    Graeme J. Taylor;Graeme J. Taylor;R. Michael Bagby;R. Michael Bagby;James D.A. Parker;James D.A. Parker

  • Recent Developments in Alexithymia Theory and Research

    Graeme J Taylor

  • The 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: IV. Reliability and factorial validity in different languages and cultures

    Graeme J Taylor;R.Michael Bagby;James D.A Parker

  • The 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale III. Reliability and factorial validity in a community population

    James D A Parker;Graeme J Taylor;R Michael Bagby

  • New trends in alexithymia research.

    Graeme J. Taylor;R. Michael Bagby

  • Cross validation of the factor structure of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: An Italian multicenter study

    Cinzia Bressi;Graeme Taylor;James Parker;Sergio Bressi

  • The relationship between emotional intelligence and alexithymia

    James D.A Parker;Graeme J Taylor;R.Michael Bagby

  • Factorial validity of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale

    James D. A. Parker;R. Michael Bagby;Graeme J. Taylor;Norman S. Endler

  • Criterion validity of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale.

    G. J. Taylor;R. M. Bagby;D. P. Ryan;J. D. A. Parker

  • The Revised Toronto Alexithymia Scale: some reliability, validity, and normative data.

    G. J. Taylor;R. M. Bagby;J. D. A. Parker

  • Psychosomatic medicine and contemporary psychoanalysis

    Graeme J. Taylor

  • The development of the Toronto Structured Interview for Alexithymia: item selection, factor structure, reliability and concurrent validity.

    R. Michael Bagby;Graeme J. Taylor;James D.A. Parker;Susan E. Dickens

  • Relationships between alexithymia and psychological characteristics associated with eating disorders

    Graeme J. Taylor;James D.A. Parker;R.Michael Bagby;Michael P. Bourke

  • Alexithymia and the Recognition of Facial Expressions of Emotion

    J.D.A. Parker;G.J. Taylor;R.M. Bagby

  • An overview of the alexithymia construct.

    Graeme J. Taylor;R. Michael Bagby

Frequent Co-Authors

R. Michael Bagby
R. Michael Bagby University of Toronto
James D. A. Parker
James D. A. Parker Trent University
Olivier Luminet
Olivier Luminet Université Catholique de Louvain
Lena C. Quilty
Lena C. Quilty Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Piero Porcelli
Piero Porcelli University of Chieti-Pescara
Filip De Fruyt
Filip De Fruyt Ghent University
Louis A. Gottschalk
Louis A. Gottschalk University of California, Irvine
Per Bech
Per Bech University of Copenhagen
Gordon Parker
Gordon Parker University of New South Wales
Jan van den Bout
Jan van den Bout Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens up diverse opportunities, especially in fields such as substance abuse counseling. Many universities offer related online degrees, allowing students to specialize in areas like addiction studies, mental health, or clinical psychology—all from the flexibility of home.

For those interested in counseling roles, education and training requirements can vary widely by state and city. For example, if you want to explore how to become a substance abuse counselor in Honolulu, you’ll need to review local educational standards and licensing steps. Similarly, learning about Houston substance abuse counselors education requirements or Huntsville substance abuse counselors education requirements will help you understand the local demand and qualifications needed in Texas.

Requirements may also differ in other areas, so if you’re interested in Indiana, explore the substance abuse counselor requirements in Indianapolis for a full overview. Earning an online degree in psychology can provide a strong foundation for entering these rewarding and impactful roles across the country.

Best Scientists Citing Graeme J. Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles