World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6539 6086 3547 3218 112 14157

Jeffrey T. Barth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeffrey T. Barth between 1981 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeffrey T. Barth published across 40 years, from 1981 to 2020, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2000. 4 of the 127 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2000. 1981: 4 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 7 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 4 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 4 publications
1981 2020

127 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeffrey T. Barth: publications per year, 1981 to 2020
Year Publications
1981 4
1982 1
1983 1
1984 1
1985 1
1986 7
1987 1
1988 1
1989 3
1990 3
1991 4
1992 1
1993 2
1994 1
1995 1
1996 3
1997 5
1998 5
1999 8
2000 10
2001 6
2002 3
2003 5
2004 1
2005 2
2006 6
2007 5
2008 4
2009 7
2010 3
2011 1
2012 4
2013 3
2014 3
2015 3
2016 2
2017 1
2018 1
2019 0
2020 4
Total 127
Download as CSV

Jeffrey T. Barth publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey T. Barth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 112 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 112
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeffrey T. Barth D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey T. Barth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 45
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1992 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Jeffrey T. Barth is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. Their academic contributions primarily fall within the field of Medicine, with a focus on related subfields including Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Neurology.

Their research encompasses several main topics such as Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Clinical Practice Guidelines Implementation, and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances. These topics reflect an emphasis on both the clinical and public health aspects of brain injury management and research.

One notable paper authored by Barth is titled "Summary of evidence-based guideline update: Evaluation and management of concussion in sports: Report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology," published in 2020 in UNC Libraries.

  • Christopher C. Giza
  • Jeffrey S. Kutcher
  • Stephen Ashwal
  • Thomas S.D. Getchius
  • Gérard A. Gioia

Barth has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including Christopher C. Giza, Jeffrey S. Kutcher, Stephen Ashwal, Thomas S.D. Getchius, and Gérard A. Gioia.

  • UNC Libraries

Their publications have appeared in venues such as UNC Libraries.

In 1992, Jeffrey T. Barth was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA).

Best Publications

  • Disability Caused by Minor Head Injury

    Rebecca W. Rimel;Bruno Giordani;Jeffrey T. Barth;Thomas J. Boll

  • The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery.

    Donna K. Broshek;Jeffrey T. Barth

  • Summary of evidence-based guideline update: Evaluation and management of concussion in sports Report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

    Christopher C. Giza;Jeffrey S. Kutcher;Stephen Ashwal;Jeffrey Barth

  • Symptom validity assessment: practice issues and medical necessity NAN policy & planning committee.

    Shane S. Bush;Ronald M. Ruff;Alexander I. Tröster;Jeffrey T. Barth

  • Sex differences in outcome following sports-related concussion.

    Donna K. Broshek;Tanya Kaushik;Jason R. Freeman;David Erlanger

  • Moderate head injury: completing the clinical spectrum of brain trauma.

    Rebecca W. Rimel;Bruno Giordani;Jeffrey T. Barth;John A. Jane

  • Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Associated Hypoxemia

    Larry J. Findley;Jeffrey T. Barth;David C. Powers;Stephen C. Wilhoit

  • Recommendations for diagnosing a mild traumatic brain injury: a National Academy of Neuropsychology education paper.

    Ronald M. Ruff;Grant L. Iverson;Jeffrey T. Barth;Shane S. Bush

  • Neuropsychological functioning and recovery after mild head injury in collegiate athletes

    Stephen N. Macciocchi;Jeffrey T. Barth;Wayne Alves;Rebecca W. Rimel

  • Neurobehavioral outcome 1 year after severe head injury. Experience of the Traumatic Coma Data Bank.

    Levin Hs;Gary He;Eisenberg Hm;Ruff Rm

  • Postconcussive symptoms after uncomplicated mild head injury

    Wayne Alves;Stephen N. Macciocchi;Jeffrey T. Barth

  • Neuropsychological sequelae of minor head injury.

    Jeffrey T. Barth;Stephen N. Macciocchi;Bruno Giordani;Rebecca Rimel

  • Mild head injury in sports: Neuropsychological sequelae and recovery of function.

    Jeffrey T. Barth;Wayne M. Alves;Thomas V. Ryan;Stephen N. Macciocchi

  • Symptom-based assessment of the severity of a concussion

    David Erlanger;Tanya Kaushik;Robert Cantu;Jeffrey T. Barth

  • Neuropsychological evaluation in the diagnosis and management of sports-related concussion

    Rosemarie Scolaro Moser;Grant L. Iverson;Ruben J. Echemendia;Mark R. Lovell

  • Monitoring Resolution of Postconcussion Symptoms in Athletes: Preliminary Results of a Web-Based Neuropsychological Test Protocol.

    David Erlanger;Ethan Saliba;Jeffrey Barth;Jon Almquist

  • Acceleration-Deceleration Sport-Related Concussion: The Gravity of It All.

    Barth Jt;Freeman;Broshek Dk;Varney Rn

  • Development and validation of a web-based neuropsychological test protocol for sports-related return-to-play decision-making

    David Erlanger;Daniel Feldman;Kenneth Kutner;Tanya Kaushik

  • Multiple Concussions and Neuropsychological Functioning in Collegiate Football Players.

    Stephen N. Macciocchi;Jeffrey T. Barth;Lauren Littlefield;Robert C. Cantu

  • Neuropsychology of sports-related head injury: Dementia Pugilistica to Post Concussion Syndrome.

    David M. Erlanger;Kenneth C. Kutner;Jeffrey T. Barth;Ronnie Barnes

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald M. Ruff
Ronald M. Ruff University of California, San Francisco
Angela L. Jefferson
Angela L. Jefferson Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Grant L. Iverson
Grant L. Iverson Harvard University
John A. Jane
John A. Jane University of Virginia Health System
Cecil R. Reynolds
Cecil R. Reynolds Texas A&M University
Ruben J. Echemendia
Ruben J. Echemendia University of Missouri–Kansas City
Bradley N. Axelrod
Bradley N. Axelrod United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Peter A. Lichtenberg
Peter A. Lichtenberg Wayne State University
Glenn J. Larrabee
Glenn J. Larrabee Veterans Health Administration
Alan L. Peterson
Alan L. Peterson The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering studying Psychology in the USA, a wide range of online degree options and career pathways are available. Many students use their psychology background to pursue roles in social work, counseling, human resources, or related fields. Each state has specific educational and licensure requirements for social workers, especially for those looking to practice or specialize in clinical settings.

For example, social worker degree requirements in Connecticut emphasize a bachelor’s or master’s degree from an accredited program, as well as supervised fieldwork. In Delaware, social worker degree requirements in Delaware similarly require accredited education and state-specific licensure steps.

Other states, such as Florida, also have clear guidelines on the Florida education requirements for social workers, which include passing relevant exams and validation of degree credentials. Meanwhile, the Georgia minimum degree requirement for social workers outlines the need for a bachelor’s at minimum, with additional opportunities for those holding advanced degrees.

Exploring these requirements can help you identify the best online degree programs and career paths that align with your professional goals in psychology and social work.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey T. Barth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles