World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
107
Citations
47676
World Ranking
6190
National Ranking
3301

John A. Jane publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John A. Jane sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 554 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John A. Jane D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John A. Jane sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John A. Jane is affiliated with the University of Virginia Health System in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with significant contributions in subfields such as neurology, surgery, epidemiology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and pathology and forensic medicine.

The scientist's recent publications include studies on radiosurgery and radiotherapy, particularly involving tumor treatment and neuro-oncological conditions. Notable papers include:

  • Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Pituitary Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2021, published in Cancers
  • Stereotactic radiosurgery as the primary management for patients with Koos grade IV vestibular schwannomas, 2021, published in Journal of Neurosurgery
  • Radiotherapy of Parasellar Tumours, 2020, published in Neuroendocrinology
  • Stereotactic radiosurgery as the first-line treatment for intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas, 2021, published in Journal of Neurosurgery
  • Optimizing stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with recurrent or residual craniopharyngiomas, 2021, published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology

John A. Jane frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including Ajay Niranjan, L. Dade Lunsford, Suchet Taori, Steven A. Burton, and Samuel Adida.

The researcher's work frequently appears in the following venues:

  • Journal of Neuro-Oncology
  • Neurosurgery
  • Cancers
  • World Neurosurgery
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics

The main research topics covered in their publications are:

  • Meningioma and schwannoma management
  • Neurofibromatosis and schwannoma cases
  • Management of metastatic bone disease
  • Glioma diagnosis and treatment
  • Vascular malformations diagnosis and treatment
  • Spine and intervertebral disc pathology
  • Brain metastases and treatment

Best Publications

  • The International Cooperative Study on the Timing of Aneurysm Surgery. Part 1 Overall management results

    Kassell Nf;Torner Jc;Haley Ec;Jane Ja

  • The role of secondary brain injury in determining outcome from severe head injury.

    Randall M. Chesnut;Lawrence F. Marshall;Melville R. Klauber;Barbara A. Blunt

  • A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography

    Lawrence F. Marshall;Sharon Bowers Marshall;Melville R. Klauber;Marjan van Berkum Clark

  • Disability Caused by Minor Head Injury

    Rebecca W. Rimel;Bruno Giordani;Jeffrey T. Barth;Thomas J. Boll

  • The International Cooperative Study on the Timing of Aneurysm Surgery. Part 2: Surgical results.

    Kassell Nf;Torner Jc;Jane Ja;Haley Ec

  • Impact of ICP instability and hypotension on outcome in patients with severe head trauma

    Anthony Marmarou;Randy L. Anderson;John D. Ward;Sung C. Choi

  • The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomography.

    Marshall Lf;Marshall Sb;Klauber Mr;Van Berkum Clark M

  • The outcome of severe closed head injury

    Lawrence F. Marshall;Theresa Gautille;Melville R. Klauber;Howard M. Eisenberg

  • Influence of the type of intracranial lesion on outcome from severe head injury

    T A Gennarelli;G M Spielman;T W Langfitt;P L Gildenberg

  • Initial CT findings in 753 patients with severe head injury. A report from the NIH Traumatic Coma Data Bank

    Eisenberg Hm;Gary He;Aldrich Ef;Saydjari C

  • Decompressive bifrontal craniectomy in the treatment of severe refractory posttraumatic cerebral edema.

    Richard S. Polin;Mark E. Shaffrey;Christopher A. Bogaev;Nancy Tisdale

  • Moderate head injury: completing the clinical spectrum of brain trauma.

    Rebecca W. Rimel;Bruno Giordani;Jeffrey T. Barth;John A. Jane

  • Neuropsychological functioning and recovery after mild head injury in collegiate athletes

    Stephen N. Macciocchi;Jeffrey T. Barth;Wayne Alves;Rebecca W. Rimel

  • Age and outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: why do older patients fare worse?

    Giuseppe Lanzino;Neal F. Kassell;Teresa P. Germanson;Gail L. Kongable

  • The National Traumatic Coma Data Bank. Part 1: Design, purpose, goals, and results.

    Lawrence F. Marshall;Donald P. Becker;Sharon A. Bowers;Carol Cayard

  • The supraorbital approach: Technical note

    J A Jane;T S Park;L H Pobereskin;H R Winn

  • Neurobehavioral outcome 1 year after severe head injury. Experience of the Traumatic Coma Data Bank.

    Levin Hs;Gary He;Eisenberg Hm;Ruff Rm

  • Ventriculostomy infections: the effect of monitoring duration and catheter exchange in 584 patients

    Kathryn L. Holloway;Tom Barnes;Sung Choi;Ross Bullock

  • Neuropsychological sequelae of minor head injury.

    Jeffrey T. Barth;Stephen N. Macciocchi;Bruno Giordani;Rebecca Rimel

  • Mild head injury in sports: Neuropsychological sequelae and recovery of function.

    Jeffrey T. Barth;Wayne M. Alves;Thomas V. Ryan;Stephen N. Macciocchi

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward R. Laws
Edward R. Laws Brigham and Women's Hospital
Aaron S. Dumont
Aaron S. Dumont Tulane University
Jason P. Sheehan
Jason P. Sheehan University of Virginia
Lawrence F. Marshall
Lawrence F. Marshall University of California, San Diego
Howard M. Eisenberg
Howard M. Eisenberg University of Maryland, Baltimore
Anthony Marmarou
Anthony Marmarou Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center
Mary Lee Vance
Mary Lee Vance University of Virginia
Edward H. Oldfield
Edward H. Oldfield University of Virginia
Nader Pouratian
Nader Pouratian University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the pathway to becoming a doctor in the USA is long and competitive, many students explore related healthcare fields through flexible online degrees. There are affordable online nursing programs available for those seeking quicker entry into healthcare roles, making nursing an attractive alternative or stepping stone.

For registered nurses aiming to advance, the cheapest online BSN programs allow you to upgrade your credentials while balancing work and life. If you already hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, direct entry MSN online programs can fast-track your transition into advanced nursing positions, including leadership or specialized roles.

Those with a passion for research or academia might consider online PhD programs nursing, which open doors to positions in education, policy, and high-level clinical practice. Exploring these online degree options not only expands your career prospects but also accommodates different educational backgrounds and professional goals in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing John A. Jane

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles