World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
39320
World Ranking
15372
National Ranking
7753

Lawrence F. Marshall publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence F. Marshall sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 214 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Lawrence F. Marshall D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence F. Marshall sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lawrence F. Marshall is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their academic profile reflects a career primarily associated with this institution.

The available data does not list any recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields of study, subfields, or main research topics associated with Marshall. Additionally, there are no recorded awards or honors connected to their name in this data set.

Despite the limited specifics on their research output or collaborations, Lawrence F. Marshall's connection with a major research university like the University of California, San Diego suggests involvement in scientific or academic endeavors supported by this institution's infrastructure and resources.

Best Publications

  • The role of secondary brain injury in determining outcome from severe head injury.

    Randall M. Chesnut;Lawrence F. Marshall;Melville R. Klauber;Barbara A. Blunt

  • Administration of Methylprednisolone for 24 or 48 Hours or Tirilazad Mesylate for 48 Hours in the Treatment of Acute Spinal Cord Injury: Results of the Third National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Randomized Controlled Trial

    Michael B. Bracken;Mary Jo Shepard;Theodore R. Holford;Linda Leo-Summers

  • A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography

    Lawrence F. Marshall;Sharon Bowers Marshall;Melville R. Klauber;Marjan van Berkum Clark

  • A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Methylprednisolone or Naloxone in the Treatment of Acute Spinal-Cord Injury

    Mark K. Lyons;Michael D. Partington;Fredric B. Meyer;Gary M. Yarkony

  • Neurobehavioral outcome following minor head injury : a three-center study

    Harvey S. Levin;Steven Mattis;Ronald M. Ruff;Howard M. Eisenberg

  • Clinical trials in head injury

    Raj K. Narayan;Mary Ellen Michel;Beth Ansell;Alex Baethmann

  • Impact of ICP instability and hypotension on outcome in patients with severe head trauma

    Anthony Marmarou;Randy L. Anderson;John D. Ward;Sung C. Choi

  • Methylprednisolone or naloxone treatment after acute spinal cord injury: 1-year follow-up data. Results of the second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study.

    Bracken Mb;Shepard Mj;Collins Wf;Holford Tr

  • The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomography.

    Marshall Lf;Marshall Sb;Klauber Mr;Van Berkum Clark M

  • The outcome of severe closed head injury

    Lawrence F. Marshall;Theresa Gautille;Melville R. Klauber;Howard M. Eisenberg

  • Patient age and outcome following severe traumatic brain injury: an analysis of 5600 patients.

    Chantal W P M Hukkelhoven;Ewout W Steyerberg;Anneke J J Rampen;Elana Farace

  • Influence of the type of intracranial lesion on outcome from severe head injury

    T A Gennarelli;G M Spielman;T W Langfitt;P L Gildenberg

  • Initial CT findings in 753 patients with severe head injury. A report from the NIH Traumatic Coma Data Bank

    Eisenberg Hm;Gary He;Aldrich Ef;Saydjari C

  • Prediction of outcome in traumatic brain injury with computed tomographic characteristics: a comparison between the computed tomographic classification and combinations of computed tomographic predictors.

    Andrew I R Maas;Chantal W P M Hukkelhoven;Lawrence F Marshall;Ewout W Steyerberg

  • Outcome from head injury related to patient's age. A longitudinal prospective study of adult and pediatric head injury.

    Thomas G. Luerssen;Melville R. Klauber;Lawrence F. Marshall

  • The outcome with aggressive treatment in severe head injuries. Part I: the significance of intracranial pressure monitoring.

    Lawrence F. Marshall;Randall W. Smith;Harvey M. Shapiro

  • High-dose barbiturate control of elevated intracranial pressure in patients with severe head injury

    Howard M. Eisenberg;Ralph F. Frankowski;Charles F. Contant;Lawrence F. Marshall

  • Early and Late Systemic Hypotension as a Frequent and Fundamental Source of Cerebral Ischemia Following Severe Brain Injury in the Traumatic Coma Data Bank

    R. M. Chesnut;S. B. Marshall;J. Piek;B. A. Blunt

  • Intracranial hypertension and cerebral perfusion pressure: influence on neurological deterioration and outcome in severe head injury*

    Niels Juul;Gabrielle F. Morris;Sharon B. Marshall;Lawrence F. Marshall

  • A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Methylprednisolone or Naloxone in the Treatment of Acute Spinal-Cord Injury: Results of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study

    M. B. Bracken;M. J. Shepard;W. F. Collins;T. R. Holford

Frequent Co-Authors

Howard M. Eisenberg
Howard M. Eisenberg University of Maryland, Baltimore
Melville R. Klauber
Melville R. Klauber University of California, San Diego
Anthony Marmarou
Anthony Marmarou Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center
John A. Jane
John A. Jane University of Virginia Health System
Andrew I. R. Maas
Andrew I. R. Maas University of Antwerp
Theodore R. Holford
Theodore R. Holford Yale University
Michael B. Bracken
Michael B. Bracken Yale University
Volker K. H. Sonntag
Volker K. H. Sonntag St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
Ronald M. Ruff
Ronald M. Ruff University of California, San Francisco
Ewout W. Steyerberg
Ewout W. Steyerberg Leiden University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

There are a variety of online degrees and career pathways for those interested in medicine and healthcare in the USA. Many students begin their journey by becoming registered nurses, and for those seeking an affordable route, exploring the cheapest rn to bsn program online can provide a cost-effective way to advance their qualifications and career prospects.

If you do not have a nursing background but want to transition quickly into advanced nursing roles, you may want to consider entry level msn programs online. These programs allow individuals with non-nursing bachelor’s degrees to earn a Master of Science in Nursing at an accelerated pace.

For those looking for the easiest and quickest entry into nursing, there are online adn programs for non nurses that provide a straightforward route into the field. These programs are designed with accessibility and flexibility in mind.

Interested in the administrative side of healthcare? Consider medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa. These programs allow you to work behind the scenes in healthcare, and financial aid options can make education more affordable.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence F. Marshall

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles