World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andrew I. R. Maas

Andrew I. R. Maas

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 108 5927 5570 64 61 387 51754

Andrew I. R. Maas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew I. R. Maas between 1975 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew I. R. Maas published across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2021. 17 of the 393 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2021. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 5 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 4 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 38 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 8 publications
1975 2025

393 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew I. R. Maas: publications per year, 1975 to 2025
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 1
1977 5
1978 0
1979 1
1980 1
1981 1
1982 1
1983 1
1984 2
1985 1
1986 4
1987 1
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 3
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 3
1998 4
1999 7
2000 4
2001 2
2002 7
2003 6
2004 5
2005 12
2006 7
2007 19
2008 15
2009 4
2010 15
2011 12
2012 16
2013 15
2014 16
2015 21
2016 16
2017 21
2018 12
2019 22
2020 26
2021 38
2022 16
2023 10
2024 9
2025 8
Total 393
Download as CSV

Andrew I. R. Maas publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew I. R. Maas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 387 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861 387
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew I. R. Maas D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew I. R. Maas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445 108
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Andrew I. R. Maas is affiliated with the University of Antwerp in Belgium. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with an emphasis on neurology, emergency medicine, epidemiology, surgery, and molecular biology. The main topics covered in their work include traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances, traumatic brain injury research, trauma and emergency care studies, cardiac arrest and resuscitation, neurosurgical procedures and complications, spinal fractures and fixation techniques, and emergency and acute care studies.

They have published extensively in the following venues:

  • Journal of Neurotrauma (16 publications)
  • The Lancet Neurology (6 publications)
  • Intensive Care Medicine (6 publications)
  • Brain and Spine (5 publications)
  • Critical Care (3 publications)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Andrew I. R. Maas include:

  • Giuseppe Citerio (38 joint publications)
  • David Menon (38 joint publications)
  • Hester F. Lingsma (30 joint publications)
  • Endre Czeiter (29 joint publications)
  • Krisztina Amrein (27 joint publications)

Examples of recent papers authored by Andrew I. R. Maas include:

  • Clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury in China: a prospective, multicentre, longitudinal, observational study (2020, The Lancet Neurology)
  • Pathological Computed Tomography Features Associated With Adverse Outcomes After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (2021, JAMA Neurology)
  • Surgery versus conservative treatment for traumatic acute subdural haematoma: a prospective, multicentre, observational, comparative effectiveness study (2022, The Lancet Neurology)
  • Incremental prognostic value of acute serum biomarkers for functional outcome after traumatic brain injury (CENTER-TBI): an observational cohort study (2022, The Lancet Neurology)
  • Evaluation of Outcomes Among Patients With Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension Treated With Decompressive Craniectomy vs Standard Medical Care at 24 Months (2022, JAMA Neurology)

Best Publications

  • Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults.

    Andrew I R Maas;Nino Stocchetti;Ross Bullock

  • Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research

    Andrew I R Maas;David K Menon;P David Adelson;Nada Andelic

  • Position Statement: Definition of Traumatic Brain Injury

    David K. Menon;Karen Schwab;David W. Wright;Andrew I. R. Maas

  • Changing patterns in the epidemiology of traumatic brain injury

    Bob Roozenbeek;Andrew I. R. Maas;David K. Menon

  • Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics.

    Ewout W Steyerberg;Nino Mushkudiani;Pablo Perel;Isabella Butcher

  • Classification of Traumatic Brain Injury for Targeted Therapies

    Kathryn E. Saatman;Ann-Christine Duhaime;Ross Bullock;Andrew I.R. Maas

  • Clinical trials in head injury

    Raj K. Narayan;Mary Ellen Michel;Beth Ansell;Alex Baethmann

  • The Glasgow Coma Scale at 40 years: standing the test of time

    Graham Teasdale;Andrew Maas;Fiona Lecky;Geoffrey Manley

  • Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in Europe.

    Wouter Peeters;Ruben van den Brande;Suzanne Polinder;Alexandra Brazinova

  • Patient age and outcome following severe traumatic brain injury: an analysis of 5600 patients.

    Chantal W P M Hukkelhoven;Ewout W Steyerberg;Anneke J J Rampen;Elana Farace

  • EBIC-Guidelines for Management of Severe Head Injury in Adults

    A. I. R. Maas;M. Dearden;G. M. Teasdale;R. Braakman

  • Prediction of outcome in traumatic brain injury with computed tomographic characteristics: a comparison between the computed tomographic classification and combinations of computed tomographic predictors.

    Andrew I R Maas;Chantal W P M Hukkelhoven;Lawrence F Marshall;Ewout W Steyerberg

  • Severe head injuries in three countries.

    B Jennett;G Teasdale;S Galbraith;J Pickard

  • Multivariable prognostic analysis in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study.

    Gordon D Murray;Isabella Butcher;Gillian S McHugh;Juan Lu

  • Early management of severe traumatic brain injury.

    Jeffrey V Rosenfeld;Andrew I Maas;Peter Bragge;M Cristina Morganti-Kossmann

  • Brain oxygen tension in severe head injury.

    Wimar A. van den Brink;Henk van Santbrink;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Cees J. J. Avezaat

  • Early prognosis in traumatic brain injury: from prophecies to predictions

    Hester F. Lingsma;Bob Roozenbeek;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Gordon D. Murray

  • The European Brain Injury Consortium survey of head injuries

    G D Murray;G M Teasdale;R Braakman;F Cohadon

  • A Clinical Trial of Progesterone for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

    Brett E. Skolnick;Andrew I. R. Maas;Raj K. Narayan;Roland Gerritsen van der Hoop

  • Prognostic value of secondary insults in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study

    Gillian S McHugh;Doortje C Engel;Isabella Butcher;Ewout W Steyerberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Ewout W. Steyerberg
Ewout W. Steyerberg Leiden University Medical Center
David K. Menon
David K. Menon University of Cambridge
Hester F. Lingsma
Hester F. Lingsma Erasmus University Rotterdam
Nino Stocchetti
Nino Stocchetti University of Milan
Gordon D. Murray
Gordon D. Murray University of Edinburgh
Geoffrey T. Manley
Geoffrey T. Manley University of California, San Francisco
Giuseppe Citerio
Giuseppe Citerio University of Milano-Bicocca
Anthony Marmarou
Anthony Marmarou Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center
Suzanne Polinder
Suzanne Polinder Erasmus University Rotterdam
David O. Okonkwo
David O. Okonkwo University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine in the USA offers a wide array of online degree and career advancement options. For those passionate about preventative care and wellness, earning a nutritionist online degree can open doors to careers in healthcare, education, and community outreach.

Leadership roles in the growing healthcare industry are also accessible online. CAHME accredited online healthcare administration programs provide essential business and management training necessary for hospital, clinic, or health system administration.

Currently licensed nurses looking to advance their skills may consider flexible bridge programs. The option for an online RN to BSN no clinicals pathway makes it easier for working professionals to complete their bachelor’s degree without the need for on-campus clinical hours.

For nurses aiming for top leadership and educational positions, pursuing the quickest DNP program can expedite their journey to a Doctor of Nursing Practice, often in less time than traditional routes.

Exploring these online pathways can enhance your medical career and broaden your expertise—no matter where you’re starting from.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew I. R. Maas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles